of course you're right, we knew when they were actively surpressing therapeutics it was to justify an EUA, but that's more of a larger criminal conspiracy. the argument over the EUA is not going to help an individual avoid their employer's policy.

but an employee should formally ask, in the name of equal treatment, how are they going to protect the workplace from the vaccinated, given these high infection rates with new variants that the boosters don't protect against?

of course you're right, we knew when they were actively surpressing therapeutics it was to justify an EUA, but that's more of a larger criminal conspiracy. the argument over the EUA is not going to help an individual avoid their employer's policy.

but an employee should formerly ask, in the name of equal treatment, how are they going to protect the workplace from the vaccinated, given these high infection rates with new variants that the boosters don't protect against?

of course you're right, we knew when they were actively surpassing therapeutics it was to justify an EUA, but that's more of a larger criminal conspiracy. the argument over the EUA is not going to help an individual avoid their employer's policy.

but an employee should formerly ask, in the name of equal treatment, how are they going to protect the workplace from the vaccinated, given these high infection rates with new variants that the boosters don't protect against?