Lol. Not following the logic are you?

I am not sure I can make it simpler but will try.

Let's even pretend that 50% of the people in the world own 90% of BTC even though we both know that is a gross exaggeration.

In this scenario the same logic applies right? Declare BTC the currency and then half the people have currency to spend and half don't. Correct?

Half were made wealthier and half were made destitute.

It's because the "currency" has already been distributed correct? Some have it some don't. Some have thousands and they were made the wealthy class, some have .005 BTC which seems small but they still have much more than the half with nothing correct?

Lol. Not following the logic are you?

I am not sure I can.ake it simpler but will try.

Let's even pretend that 50% of the people in the world own 90% of BTC even though we both know that is a gross exaggeration.

In this scenario the same logic applies right? Declare BTC the currency and then half the people have currency to spend and half don't. Correct?

Half were made wealthier and half were made destitute.

It's because the "currency" has already been distributed correct? Some have it some don't. Some have thousands and they were made the wealthy class, some have .005 BTC which seems small but they still have much more than the half with nothing correct?