It is outrageous for sure. This has been going on for a very long time. The best advice is to keep the courts out of your family life. The underlying issue is -- 'Who owns the children?' If you read up on this subject, you'd be outraged. The Courts believe the State is 'parens patriae' and 'own' your children. There is over 150 years of legal cases involving this. I tend to believe that volunteering and taking a marriage license is a motivating factor for this. A license is a 'privilege' granted by the State. Marriage is an organic Right and is the most important sacrament given to us before God. It is here the two (man and woman) is bonded as one (husband and wife) before God. Marriage is a contract that is officiated and witnessed by God Himself. In my view, no one is qualified in performing this, but God Himself. The official carrying out the ceremonious act should be filled with the Holy Spirit.

Contrary to this important concept is the marriage license. It replaces the contract before God with one that is from the State (ergo, judge, magistrate). In the legal writings of the courts, they clearly recognize this.

What does this all of this have to do with the scientist father and the judges rulings? The judge is showing the father that the mother and child are considered a 'ward' of the court. The State speaks for the ward (mother and child) and not the father. It is essentially the father versus the State and not the mother. It is actually a modern day gynaeceum, not any different than in the medieval age and before.

It is outrageous for sure. This has been going on for a very long time. The best advice is to keep the courts out of your family life. The underlying issue is -- 'Who owns the children?' If you read up on this subject, you'd be outraged. The Courts believe the State is 'parens patriae' and 'own' your children. There is over 150 years of legal cases involving this. I tend to believe that volunteering and taking a marriage license is a motivating factor for this. A license is a 'privilege' granted by the State. Marriage is an organic Right and is the most important sacrament given to us before God. It is here the two (man and woman) is bonded as one (husband and wife) before God. Marriage is a contract that is officiated and witnessed by God Himself. In my view, no one is qualified in performing this, but God Himself. The official carrying out the ceremonious act should be filled with the Holy Spirit.

Contrary to this important concept is the marriage license. It replaces the contract before God with one that is from the State (ergo, judge, magistrate). In the legal writings of the courts, they clearly recognize this.

What does this all of this have to do with the scientist father and the judges rulings? The judge is showing the father that the mother and child are considered a 'ward' of the court. It is actually a modern day gynaeceum, not any different than in the medieval age and before.

It is outrageous for sure. This has been going on for a very long time. The best advice is to keep the courts out of your family life. The underlying issue is -- 'Who owns the children?' If you read up on this subject, you'd be outraged. The Courts believe the State is 'parens patriae' and 'own' your children. There is over 150 years of legal cases involving this. I tend to believe that volunteering and taking a marriage license is a motivating factor for this. A license is a 'privilege' granted by the State. Marriage is an organic Right and is the most important sacrament given to us before God. It is here the two (man and woman) is bonded as one (husband and wife) before God. Marriage is a contract that is officiated and witnessed by God Himself. In my view, no one is qualified in performing this, but God Himself. The official carrying out the ceremonious act should be filled with the Holy Spirit. Contrary to this important concept is the marriage license. It replaces the contract before God with one that is from the State (ergo, judge, magistrate). In the legal writings of the courts, they clearly recognize this.

What does this all of this have to do with the scientist father and the judges rulings? The judge is showing the father that the mother and child are considered a 'ward' of the court. It is actually a modern day gynaeceum, not any different than in the medieval age and before.

It is outrageous for sure. This has been going on for a very long time. The best advice is to keep the courts out of your family life. The underlying issue is -- 'Who owns the children?' If you read up on this subject, you'd be outraged. The Courts believe the State is 'parens patriae' and 'own' your children. There is over 150 years of legal cases involving this. I tend to believe that volunteering and taking a marriage license is a motivating factor for this. A license is a 'privilege' granted by the State. Marriage is an organic Right and is the most important sacrament given to us before God. It is here the two (man and woman) is bonded as one (husband and wife) before God. Marriage is a contract that is officiated and witnessed by God Himself. In my view, no one is qualified in performing this, but God Himself. Contrary to this important concept is the marriage license. It replaces the contract before God with one that is from the State (ergo, judge, magistrate). In the legal writings of the courts, they clearly recognize this.

What does this all of this have to do with the scientist father and the judges rulings? The judge is showing the father that the mother and child are considered a 'ward' of the court. It is actually a modern day gynaeceum, not any different than in the medieval age and before.