Your entire argument is based on your own hypothetical. It's just your opinion.

You are saying essentially, "What if hypothetically the white hats are telling people that they have to resign, support our plan... would that hypothetically be different than the Derp State blackmail?"

I'd still say yes even in your imagined scenario, but I don't agree with your imagined scenario. For one thing it leaves out people like Admiral Mike Rogers and Mike Flynn who fooled the Derp State and got into powerful positions within the Obama Administration. They might have looked like black hats, but they were white hats. We don't actually know those who have only been pretending to be black hats, but were white hats all along.

Q said "There are more good than bad" implying that white hats may be more numerous than we realize.

We also don't know if the Derp State is forcing out some of these out because they suspect they talked. Too many unknowns.

I disagree.

Trump was very clear that they are the party of law and order. Q went to great lengths to do the posts in a way that followed Natsec guidelines. Following the law seemed an absolute necessity to Q so I don't agree with your speculation. Whatever is going on with the white hats side is 100% by the law in my opinion.

But like you, I'm just speculating.

Your entire argument is based on your own hypothetical. This is what you see as going on in your imagination. It's pure speculation. You have no proof whether it's true or not. It's fine to argue by speculation, but you need to make a logical framework to give evidence that your speculation might be valid.

However, you haven't presented any. It's just your opinion. You're demanding

You are saying essentially, "What if hypothetically the white hats are telling people that they have to resign, support our plan... would that hypothetically be different than the Derp State blackmail?"

I'd still say yes even in your imagined scenario, but I don't agree with your imagined scenario. For one thing it leaves out people like Admiral Mike Rogers and Mike Flynn who fooled the Derp State and got into powerful positions within the Obama Administration. They might have looked like black hats, but they were white hats. We don't actually know those who have only been pretending to be black hats, but were white hats all along.

Q said "There are more good than bad" implying that white hats may be more numerous than we realize.

We also don't know if the Derp State is forcing out some of these out because they suspect they talked. Too many unknowns. You're trying to say there is no daylight in your imagined scenario.

I disagree with your speculation. I think it's flawed and has too many unknowns.

Trump was very clear that they are the party of law and order. Q went to great lengths to do the posts in a way that followed Natsec guidelines. Following the law seemed an absolute necessity to Q so I don't agree with your speculation. Whatever is going on with the white hats side is 100% by the law in my opinion.

But like you, I'm just speculating.