"Read my posts." I did. But you don't read mine.
" I offered you two Q posts with a delta of 2 years between them showing exactly how to find them."
"Q 2565 dated 12/10/18 and Q15 dated 10/31/17. The latter is first in line and details deals have to be made because of the level of corruption. Even reaching out to certain players have been done. The former post is the final no deals posts. The door is shut."
^ As said this is just your interpretation. ^
Also you try to claim that this somehow proves your statement here:
(Blackhat: if you do this for me, these disgusting pictures and stories will stay hidden and you' ll have a lot of money, and the cherry on top, to secure your next election, dominion systems will be set to elect you.
White hat: if you do this for me, we' ll be able to work out a deal. Ok, you' ll have to resign and support our plan for the time being, and you will be able to retire and enjoy a couple of years with your family. If not, well ... leavenworth will be walk in the park for you. With these disgusting pictures and stories coming out, I do not value your life for 1 penny.
Now tell me. What is the difference? Blackmail vs Whitemail?)
^ This was your original theory ^
I say, "I disagree with your opinion". Then you try to say those two Q posts somehow mean your opinion is true. I say "I disagree and they do not prove your opinion"
You begin name calling and more ad hominem.
You're saying that you think White Hats are telling people "if you don't do what we say we'll destroy you" and then trying to claim that the Q posts prove that's true. They don't. Again, it's your opinion. I just don't agree with your line of reasoning.
I wanted to discuss that point but instead of listening to why I disagreed you just kept going "READ WHAT I WROTE" and going on the attack. I kept saying, "Yes, I got it and I disagree bec--"
"READ WHAT I WROTE."
"Yes, I got it, but I dis--"
It should have been a simple "I don't agree with your theory and I don't think you make your case" yet it continues to be more ad hominem.
Most of what you wrote was just attack. You could have just said, "This is what I meant..." and cleared it up. Instead the more you felt I didn't understand your words the more you resorted to blame. What a shame.
"Read my posts." I did. But you don't read mine.
" I offered you two Q posts with a delta of 2 years between them showing exactly how to find them."
"Q 2565 dated 12/10/18 and Q15 dated 10/31/17. The latter is first in line and details deals have to be made because of the level of corruption. Even reaching out to certain players have been done. The former post is the final no deals posts. The door is shut."
^ As said this is just your interpretation. ^
Also you try to claim that this somehow proves your statement here:
(Blackhat: if you do this for me, these disgusting pictures and stories will stay hidden and you' ll have a lot of money, and the cherry on top, to secure your next election, dominion systems will be set to elect you.
White hat: if you do this for me, we' ll be able to work out a deal. Ok, you' ll have to resign and support our plan for the time being, and you will be able to retire and enjoy a couple of years with your family. If not, well ... leavenworth will be walk in the park for you. With these disgusting pictures and stories coming out, I do not value your life for 1 penny.
Now tell me. What is the difference? Blackmail vs Whitemail?)
^ This was your original theory ^
I say, "I disagree with your opinion". Then you try to say those two Q posts somehow mean your opinion is true. I say "I disagree and they do not prove your opinion"
You begin name calling and more ad hominem.
You're saying that you think White Hats are telling people "if you don't do what we say we'll destroy you" and then trying to claim that the Q posts prove that's true. They don't. Again, it's your opinion. It's fine to have a theory, but I think you're theory is flawed and incorrect. I don't think that's what White hats are doing.
It should be a simple "I don't agree with your theory and I don't think you make your case" yet it continues to be more ad hominem. Why are you making a big deal out of that?
"Read my posts." I did. You clearly didn't read your own posts though. Pretty funny.
" I offered you two Q posts with a delta of 2 years between them showing exactly how to find them."
"Q 2565 dated 12/10/18 and Q15 dated 10/31/17. The latter is first in line and details deals have to be made because of the level of corruption. Even reaching out to certain players have been done. The former post is the final no deals posts. The door is shut."
^ As said this is just your interpretation. ^
Also you try to claim that this somehow proves your statement here:
(Blackhat: if you do this for me, these disgusting pictures and stories will stay hidden and you' ll have a lot of money, and the cherry on top, to secure your next election, dominion systems will be set to elect you.
White hat: if you do this for me, we' ll be able to work out a deal. Ok, you' ll have to resign and support our plan for the time being, and you will be able to retire and enjoy a couple of years with your family. If not, well ... leavenworth will be walk in the park for you. With these disgusting pictures and stories coming out, I do not value your life for 1 penny.
Now tell me. What is the difference? Blackmail vs Whitemail?)
^ This was your original theory ^
I say, "I disagree with your opinion". Then you try to say those two Q posts somehow mean your opinion is true. I say "I disagree and they do not prove your opinion"
You begin name calling and more ad hominem.
You're saying that you think White Hats are telling people "if you don't do what we say we'll destroy you" and then trying to claim that the Q posts prove that's true. They don't. Again, it's your opinion. It's fine to have a theory, but I think you're theory is flawed and incorrect. I don't think that's what White hats are doing.
It should be a simple "I don't agree with your theory and I don't think you make your case" yet it continues to be more ad hominem. Why are you making a big deal out of that?
"Read my posts." I did. You clearly didn't read your own posts though. Pretty funny.
Ad hominem just shows you can't make your case. You got owned badly. Well done. Keep going if you like. You're only digging your own hole deeper.