The language in your post and in this reply seem too deliberately perfect. It’s like a machine wrote them. A machine that understands well our biases and how to use them to lure, manipulate, a/b test, and/or otherwise query us.

I want you to read what you’ve written there and also in your reply to my comment above and tell me if you can see the glaring error in your approach. Describe to me the major contradiction. Why do I and dozens of others sense what we sense about your post? It’s plain as day and if you’re a human then I think you should figure this out quickly now that I’ve mentioned it.

The language in your post and in this reply seem too deliberately perfect. It’s like a machine wrote them. A machine that understands well our biases and how to use them to lure, manipulate, a/b test, and/or otherwise query us.

I want you read what you’ve written there and also in your reply to my comment above and tell me if you can see the glaring error in your approach. Describe to me the major contradiction. Why do I and dozens of others sense what we sense about your post? It’s plain as day and if you’re a human then I think you should figure this out quickly now that I’ve mentioned it.

The language in your post and in this dm you sent me seem too deliberately perfect. It’s like a machine wrote them. A machine that understands well our biases and how to use them to lure, manipulate, a/b test, and/or otherwise query us.

I want you read what you’ve written there and also here and tell me if you can see the glaring error in your approach. Describe to me the major contradiction. Why do I and dozens of others sense what we sense about you? It’s plain as day and if you’re a human then I think you should figure this out quickly now that I’ve mentioned it.