Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Interviews with Kary MuIIis. Robert Malone. Numerous papers detailing the specifications of the virus and a touch of common sense why producing the protein responsible for the cytokine response, even slightly modified, might be a little iffy given that it hasn't at the very least undergone adequate testing - most jabs are 5 to 10 yrs, this one was put out in 1~ yr. The 250+ studies at the time detailing how Ivermectin, HCQ with azithromycin, and zinc (all public) were effective at treating it as a prophylaxis as well as early treatment. Cgdev circa 2020 and other such studies detailing the survival rate, which was well over 99.99% for 17 and younger. The numerous studies detailing roughly 94% or 95% of all people who, ya know, had a number of COMORBlDlTlES. Once again, all public knowledge.

So, yes, I do agree. We all had the same information. You just didn't read any of it, moron. We did and were called the worst things for being literate. Is it so difficult for people to say they were wrong?!? Or do the people who are so devout in wanting to be right don't bother to research as it will, in all likelihood, prove them wrong? An empathetic person doesn't try to hide themselves from the truth.

As an aside, if some normie goes up to you saying but muh scientists know what they're doing and obviously know the effects. NO they DON'T know the effects. That's why they do STUDIES on it. In fact, there's never been a jab approved in under 5 yrs (with many if not most going up to 10) that I'm aware of, let alone 1ish like this one has.

2 years ago
4 score
Reason: None provided.

Interviews with Kary MuIIis. Robert Malone. Numerous papers detailing the specifications of the virus and a touch of common sense why producing the protein responsible for the cytokine response, even slightly modified, might be a little iffy given that it hasn't at the very least undergone adequate testing - most jabs are 5 to 10 yrs, this one was put out in 1~ yr. The 250+ studies at the time detailing how Ivermectin, HCQ, azithromycin, and zinc (all public) were effective at treating it as a prophylaxis as well as early treatment. Cgdev circa 2020 and other such studies detailing the survival rate, which was well over 99.99% for 17 and younger. The numerous studies detailing roughly 94% or 95% of all people who, ya know, had a number of COMORBlDlTlES. Once again, all public knowledge.

So, yes, I do agree. We all had the same information. You just didn't read any of it, moron. We did and were called the worst things for being literate. Is it so difficult for people to say they were wrong?!? Or do the people who are so devout in wanting to be right don't bother to research as it will, in all likelihood, prove them wrong? An empathetic person doesn't try to hide themselves from the truth.

As an aside, if some normie goes up to you saying but muh scientists know what they're doing and obviously know the effects. NO they DON'T know the effects. That's why they do STUDIES on it. In fact, there's never been a jab approved in under 5 yrs (with many if not most going up to 10) that I'm aware of, let alone 1ish like this one has.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Interviews with Kary MuIIis. Robert Malone. Numerous papers detailing the specifications of the virus and a touch of common sense why producing the protein responsible for the cytokine response, even slightly modified, might be a little iffy given that it hasn't at the very least undergone adequate testing - most jabs are 5 to 10 yrs, this one was put out in 1~ yr. The 250+ studies at the time detailing how Ivermectin, HCQ, azithromycin, and zinc (all public) were effective at treating it as a prophylaxis as well as early treatment. Cgdev circa 2020 and other such studies detailing the survival rate, which was well over 99.99% for 17 and younger. The numerous studies detailing roughly 94% or 95% of all people who, ya know, had a number of COMORBlDlTlES. Once again, all public knowledge.

So, yes, I do agree. We all had the same information. You just didn't read any of it, moron. We did and were called the worst things for being literate. Is it so difficult for people to say they were wrong?!? Or do the people who are so devout in wanting to be right don't bother to research as it will, in all likelihood, prove them wrong? An empathetic person doesn't try to hide themselves from the truth.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Interviews with Kary MuIIis. Robert Malone. Numerous papers detailing the specifications of the virus. The 250+ studies at the time detailing how Ivermectin, HCQ, azithromycin, and zinc (all public) were effective at treating it as a prophylaxis as well as early treatment. Cgdev circa 2020 and other such studies detailing the survival rate, which was well over 99.99% for 17 and younger. The numerous studies detailing roughly 94% or 95% of all people who, ya know, had a number of COMORBlDlTlES. Once again, all public knowledge.

So, yes, I do agree. We all had the same information. You just didn't read any of it, moron. We did and were called the worst things for being literate. Is it so difficult for people to say they were wrong?!? Or do the people who are so devout in wanting to be right don't bother to research as it will, in all likelihood, prove them wrong? An empathetic person doesn't try to hide themselves from the truth.

2 years ago
1 score