Not a chance. That jab has a death blossom - a ferritin nanoparticle with spike proteins bound on the surface - like a soccer ball with spikes. Hmmm, sounds like its design is based on the structure of a theoretical virus. So, when it all boils down, it is still introducing into the bloodstream the bioactive antigenic spike protein. Plus, it also comes with a specific adjuvant owned by the Army, ALFQ - a lipid nanoparticle adjuvant that contains a saponin that increases immune response by irritating the crap out of the immune system in order to muster the troops to recognize the antigenic spike protein to make antibodies. This is in addition to a whole lot of crap that usually comes with jabs to begin with. All of this technology is new and has been used only in a few small trials. Once again, they will be looking to experiment on the public and the military.

The very fact that these people somehow think that introducing something into circulation that will have an immune impact on a pathogen that infects the lungs is ridiculous. The antibodies that are needed in lung tissue is secretory IgA produced by the lymphocytes in the lung tissue itself - which is the landing site and battleground for an airborne pathogen. The antibodies that the body is producing as a result of spike protein exposure from these inoculations introduced into the bloodstream, are circulating IgG and IgA, which protect the body from pathogens in the bloodstream and the rest of the organs. Therefore, the very idea that the antibodies in the bloodstream are going to offer any protection against airborne illness that targets the lungs, is flawed at the ground level. This includes any inoculation to target airborne illness, no matter what platform it uses. The almost non existent absolute risk reduction for the jabs against SARS-CoV-2, as found in what trial data we have obtained, confirms this premise. This is also why influenza vaxxines are just as useless. They do not stop respiratory infections and may come with more risk than any perceived benefit. All of these inoculations create robust immunogenicity to what are otherwise weak targets. In other words, the immune response is over the top and in the wrong place.

The military has a piss poor history when it comes to vaxxines. When I worked at the VA I had many patients that had been victims of vaxxine experimentation at the hands of the military. Our military has sadly experimented on our best and brightest for decades with no concern for the aftermath. Often our vets have had to fight in court to have their conditions recognized. The process can take years. The government always plays the numbers game in that by the time they have to pay out, many of the plaintiffs, our vets, will have died or been too sick to pursue a case. Sorry, I will pass on anything the military has had its hands on.

Not a chance. That jab has a death blossom - a ferritin nanoparticle with spike proteins bound on the surface - like a soccer ball with spikes. Hmmm, sounds like its design is based on the structure of a theoretical virus. So, when it all boils down, it is still introducing into the bloodstream the bioactive antigenic spike protein. Plus, it also comes with a specific adjuvant owned by the Army, ALFQ - a lipid nanoparticle adjuvant that contains a saponin that increases immune response by irritating the crap out of the immune system in order to muster the troops to recognize the antigenic spike protein to make antibodies. This is in addition to a whole lot of crap that usually comes with jabs to begin with. All of this technology is new and has been used only in a few small trials. Once again, they will be looking to experiment on the public and the military.

The very fact that these people somehow think that introducing something into circulation that will have an immune impact on a pathogen that infects the lungs is ridiculous. The antibodies that are needed in lung tissue is secretory IgA produced by the lymphocytes in the lung tissue itself - which is the landing site and battleground for an airborne pathogen. The antibodies that the body is producing as a result of spike protein exposure from these inoculations introduced into the bloodstream, are circulating IgG and IgA, which protect the body from pathogens in the bloodstream and the rest of the organs. Therefore, the very idea that the antibodies in the bloodstream are going to offer any protection against airborne illness that targets the lungs, is flawed at the ground level. This includes any inoculation to target airborne illness, no matter what platform it uses. The almost non existent absolute risk reduction for the jabs against SARS-CoV-2, as found in what trial data we have obtained, confirms this premise. This is also why influenza vaxxines are just as useless. They do not stop respiratory infections and may come with more risk than any perceived benefit. All of these inoculations create robust immunogenicity to what are otherwise weak targets. In other words, the immune response is over the top and in the wrong place.

The military has a piss poor history when it comes to vaxxines. When I worked at the VA I had many patients that had been victims of vaxxine experimentation at the hands of the military. Our military has sadly experimented on our best and brightest for decades with no concern for the aftermath and often our vets have had to fight in court to have their conditions recognized. The process can take years. The government always plays the numbers game in that by the time they have to pay out, many of the plaintiffs, our vets, will have died or been too sick to pursue a case. Sorry, I will pass on anything the military has had its hands on.