You’re shilling for the myth of equalism and the blank slate hypothesis.

“It's no secret that certain ethnic minorities in the US commit a lot of the crimes. However this is due to Demonrat policies.”

Why do those same ethnicities have higher crime rates in every other country in the world where they’re present, including countries without Demonrat policies and where that ethnicity has almost 100% homogeneity?

The difference between chihuahuas and great danes, or pit bulls and jack russell terriers, is only a surprisingly few generations of breeding. How come humans who have bred in isolation for thousands of generations can’t have significant manifestations of difference in brain structure, intelligence, and behavior? You’re in denial of genetics, breeding, and human biodiversity.

Racial superiority is relative and contextual, just as humans are usually at the top of the food chain until they’re treading in the open ocean encircled by a tiger shark. Maybe in tropical Africa where hunting and gathering are easy and where interpersonal violence is near-constant, it is disadvantageous to be distracted by thoughts of the future and advantageous to have higher rates of genes for psychopathy. Maybe blacks are supremely suited for that environment. The flip side of that coin is that Whites are supremely suited for living in White civilization.

We can be realistic about racial differences without being unkind to people or violating other people’s rights. The problem with pushing the myth of equalism is that decent people are harmed, which was the intention of the myth in the first place. Stop being unrealistic and unkind.

You’re shilling for the myth of equalism and the blank slate hypothesis.

“It's no secret that certain ethnic minorities in the US commit a lot of the crimes. However this is due to Demonrat policies.”

Why do those same ethnicities have higher crime rates in every other country in the world where they present, including countries without Demonrat policies and where that ethnicity has almost 100% homogeneity?

The difference between chihuahuas and great danes, or pit bulls and jack russell terriers, is only a surprisingly few generations of breeding. How come humans who have bred in isolation for thousands of generations can’t have significant manifestations of difference in brain structure, intelligence, and behavior? You’re in denial of genetics, breeding, and human biodiversity.

Racial superiority is relative and contextual, just as humans are usually at the top of the food chain until they’re treading in the open ocean encircled by a tiger shark. Maybe in tropical Africa where hunting and gathering are easy and where interpersonal violence is near-constant, it is disadvantageous to be distracted by thoughts of the future and advantageous to have higher rates of genes for psychopathy. Maybe blacks are supremely suited for that environment. The flip side of that coin is that Whites are supremely suited for living in White civilization.

We can be realistic about racial differences without being unkind to people or violating other people’s rights. The problem with pushing the myth of equalism is that decent people are harmed, which was the intention of the myth in the first place. Stop being unrealistic and unkind.