If there is one other alien species besides us in the universe, then It is very likely that there are several.

Like all intelligent entities (including cellular life, plants, animals and humans) these alien species would be subject to the rules of the game theory. Game theory comes out of the mathematical analysis of cooperative behavior versus competitive behavior. Cooperative strategies always have a higher long term pay off than cheating strategies. Creating relationships based on trust is always more successful than distrusting everyone around you.

Whether or not you believe that the cooperative instinct comes out of mathematics or spirituality or evolution doesn’t matter. Tit for tat is always the best strategy in any competitive game where people or groups pair up for cooperative exchanges. If someone is nice to you must ALWAYS return the favor and be nice in return. If someone does something bad to you must immediately punish them. Hopefully, the punishment encourages them to return to cooperative behavior.

What game theory teaches you is that over the long term, a cooperative strategy is always the better choice over a competitive strategy. Even if an alien species were only 100 years ahead of humanity in their level of technology, they could very likely destroy humanity in an instant if they wanted to. However, they wouldn’t come down to earth with laser guns shooting us one by one. They could use a biological weapon, redirect an astroid towards earth or just drop their version of atomic weapons on us. A high energy neutron weapon would kill all of us but it would knockdown very few buildings or structures.

But aliens don’t destroy us and they likely won’t. Why not? Because they would face punishment from another alien species. How many children go out of their way to walk into the park and destroy an ant hill. Only a few and if you saw a child pouring gasoline onto an ant hill you would stop that child and scold them. The child might claim that the ants’ lives don’t matter. However, the ants lived in that park before the child got there and so they too have a right to exist.

Some philosophers believe that game theory is the source of morality. If so, then morality must literally be universal. Any semi-intelligent species would understand the rules of morality and the number one rule would be the golden rule of planetary invasion. Would you like it if another advanced extra terrestrial species invaded your planet? Of course not, so it is also not OK to allow them to invade other planets either.

So the universal golden rule is one species can’t just invade and take over another planets and destroy any entities that are already living on that planet. If humanity went to Mars and discovered a microbe that was harmful to human life and we wiped out that microbe, that would also be immoral.

In any case, given that there is more than one alien species they probably hold each other to that golden rule of non-planetary invasion. So for globalists to use a new weapon to blow up Hong Kong and claim “Oh my God, the aliens blew up Hong Kong as a warning to us” is just silly. No one should believe that shit.

If there is one other alien species besides us in the universe, then It is very likely that there are several.

Like all intelligent entities (including cellular life, plants, animals and humans) these alien species would be subject to the rules of the game theory. Game theory comes out of the mathematical analysis of cooperative behavior versus competitive behavior. Cooperative strategies always have a higher long term pay off than cheating strategies. Creating relationships based on trust is always more successful than distrusting everyone around you.

Whether or not you believe that the cooperative instinct comes out of mathematics or spirituality or evolution doesn’t matter. Tit for tat is always the best strategy in any competitive game where people or groups pair up for cooperative exchanges. If someone is nice to you must ALWAYS return the favor and be nice in return. If someone does something bad to you must immediately punish them. Hopefully, the punishment encourages them to return to cooperative behavior.

What game theory teaches you is that over the long term, a cooperative strategy is always the better choice over a competitive strategy. Even if an alien species were only 100 years ahead of humanity in their level of technology, they could very likely destroy humanity in an instant if they wanted to. However, they wouldn’t come down to earth with laser guns shooting us one by one. They could use a biological weapon, redirect an astroid towards earth or just drop their version of atomic weapons on us. A high energy neutron weapon would kill all of us but it would knockdown very few buildings or structures.

But aliens don’t destroy us and they likely won’t. Why not? Because they would face punishment from another alien species. How many children go out of their way to walk into the park and destroy an ant hill. Only a few and if you saw a child pouring gasoline onto an ant hill you would stop that child and scold them. The child might claim that the ants’ lives don’t matter. However, the ants lived in that park before the child got there and so they too have a right to exist.

Some philosophers believe that game theory is the source of morality. If so, then morality must literally be universal. Any semi-intelligent species would understand the rules of morality and the number one rule would be the golden rule of planetary invasion. Would you like it if another advanced extra terrestrial species invaded your planet? Of course not, so in turn it’s never OK to invade other planets.

So the universal golden rule is one species can’t just invade and take over another planets and destroy any entities that are already on it. If humanity went to Mars and discovered a microbe that was harmful to human life and we wiped out that microbe, that would also be immoral.

In any case, given that there is more than one alien species they probably hold each other to that golden rule of non-planetary invasion. So for globalists to use a new weapon to blow up Hong Kong and claim “Oh my God, the aliens blew up Hong Kong as a warning to us” is just silly. No one should believe that shit.

If there is one other alien species besides us in the universe, then It is very likely that there are several.

Like all intelligent entities (including cellular life, plants, animals and humans) these alien species would be subject to the rules of the game theory. Game theory comes out of the mathematical analysis of cooperative behavior versus competitive behavior. Cooperative strategies always have a higher long term pay off than cheating strategies. Creating relationships based on trust is always more successful than distrusting everyone around you.

Whether or not you believe that the cooperative instinct comes out of mathematics or spirituality or evolution doesn’t matter. Tit for tat is always the best strategy in any competitive game where people or groups pair up for cooperative exchanges. If someone is nice to you must ALWAYS return the favor and be nice in return. If someone does something bad to you must immediately punish them. Hopefully, the punishment encourages them to return to cooperative behavior.

What game theory teaches you is that over the long term, a cooperative strategy is always the better choice over a competitive strategy. Even if an alien species were only 100 years ahead of humanity in their level of technology, they could very likely destroy humanity in an instant if they wanted to. However, they wouldn’t come down to earth with laser guns shooting us one by one. They could use a biological weapon, redirect an astroid towards earth or just drop their version of atomic weapons on us. A high energy neutron weapon would kill all of us but it would knockdown very few buildings or structures.

But aliens don’t destroy us and they likely won’t. Why not? Because they would face punishment from another species. How many children go out of their way to walk into the park and destroy an ant hill. Only a few and if you saw a child pouring gasoline onto an ant hill you would stop that child and scold them. The child might claim that the ants’ lives don’t matter. However, the ants lived in that park before the child got there and so they too have a right to exist.

Some philosophers believe that game theory is the source of morality. If so, then morality must literally be universal. Any semi-intelligent species would understand the rules of morality and the number one rule would be the golden rule of planetary invasion. Would you like it if another advanced extra terrestrial species invaded your planet? Of course not, so in turn it’s never OK to invade other planets.

So the universal golden rule is one species can’t just invade and take over another planets and destroy any entities that are already on it. If humanity went to Mars and discovered a microbe that was harmful to human life and we wiped out that microbe, that would also be immoral.

In any case, given that there is more than one alien species they probably hold each other to that golden rule of non-planetary invasion. So for globalists to use a new weapon to blow up Hong Kong and claim “Oh my God, the aliens blew up Hong Kong as a warning to us” is just silly. No one should believe that shit.

If there is one other alien species besides us in the universe, then It is very likely that there are several.

Like all intelligent entities (including cellular life, plants, animals and humans) these alien species would be subject to the rules of the game theory. Game theory comes out of the mathematical analysis of cooperative behavior versus competitive behavior. Cooperative strategies always have a higher long term pay off than cheating strategies. Creating relationships based on trust is always more successful than distrusting everyone around you.

Whether or not you believe that the cooperative instinct comes out of mathematics or spirituality or evolution doesn’t matter. Tit for tat is always the best strategy in any competitive game where people or groups pair up for cooperative exchanges. If someone is nice to you must ALWAYS return the favor and be nice in return. If someone does something bad to you must immediately punish them. Hopefully, the punishment encourages them to return to cooperative behavior.

What game theory teaches you is that over the long term, a cooperative strategy is always the better choice over a competitive strategy. Even if an alien species were only 100 years ahead of humanity in their level of technology, they could very likely destroy humanity in an instant if they wanted to. However, they wouldn’t come down to earth with laser guns shorting us one by one. They could use a biological weapon, redirect an astroid towards earth or just drop their version of atomic weapons on us. A high energy neutron weapon would kill all of us but it would knockdown very few buildings or structures.

But aliens don’t destroy us and they likely won’t. Why not? Because they would face punishment from another species. How many children go out of their way to walk into the park and destroy an ant hill. Only a few and if you saw a child pouring gasoline onto an ant hill you would stop that child and scold them. The child might claim that the ants’ lives don’t matter. However, the ants lived in that park before the child got there and so they too have a right to exist.

Some philosophers believe that game theory is the source of morality. If so, then morality must literally be universal. Any semi-intelligent species would understand the rules of morality and the number one rule would be the golden rule of planetary invasion. Would you like it if another advanced extra terrestrial species invaded your planet? Of course not, so in turn it’s never OK to invade other planets.

So the universal golden rule is one species can’t just invade and take over another planets and destroy any entities that are already on it. If humanity went to Mars and discovered a microbe that was harmful to human life and we wiped out that microbe, that would also be immoral.

In any case, given that there is more than one alien species they probably hold each other to that golden rule of non-planetary invasion. So for globalists to use a new weapon to blow up Hong Kong and claim “Oh my God, the aliens blew up Hong Kong as a warning to us” is just silly. No one should believe that shit.

If there is one other alien species besides us in the universe, then It is very likely that there are several.

Like all intelligent entities (including cellular life, plants, animals and humans) these alien species would be subject to the rules of the game theory. Game theory comes out of the mathematical analysis of cooperative behavior versus competitive behavior. Cooperative strategies always have a higher long term pay off than cheating strategies. Creating relationships based on trust is always more successful than distrusting everyone around you.

Whether or not you believe that the cooperative instinct comes out of mathematics or spirituality or evolution doesn’t matter. Tit for tat is always the best strategy in any competitive game where people or groups pair up for cooperative exchanges. If someone is nice to you must ALWAYS return the favor and be nice in return. If someone does something bad to you must immediately punish them. Hopefully, the punishment encourages them to return to cooperative behavior.

What game theory teaches you is that over the long term, a cooperative strategy is always the better choice over a competitive strategy. Even if an alien species were only 100 years ahead of humanity in their level of technology, they could very likely destroy humanity in an instant if they wanted it to. However, they wouldn’t come down to earth insurance with laser guns shorting us one by one. They could use a biological weapon, redirect an astroid towards earth or just drop their version of atomic weapons on us. A high energy neutron weapon would kill all of us but it would knockdown very few buildings or structures.

But aliens don’t destroy us and they likely won’t. Why not? Because they would face punishment from another species. How many children go out of their way to walk into the park and destroy an ant hill. Only a few and if you saw a child pouring gasoline onto an ant hill you would stop that child and scold them. The child might claim that the ants’ lives don’t matter. However, the ants lived in that park before the child got there and so they too have a right to exist.

Some philosophers believe that game theory is the source of morality. If so, then morality must literally be universal. Any semi-intelligent species would understand the rules of morality and the number one rule would be the golden rule of planetary invasion. Would you like it if another advanced extra terrestrial species invaded your planet? Of course not, so in turn it’s never OK to invade other planets.

So the universal golden rule is one species can’t just invade and take over another planets and destroy any entities that are already on it. If humanity went to Mars and discovered a microbe that was harmful to human life and we wiped out that microbe, that would also be immoral.

In any case, given that there is more than one alien species they probably hold each other to that golden rule of non-planetary invasion. So for globalists to use a new weapon to blow up Hong Kong and claim “Oh my God, the aliens blew up Hong Kong as a warning to us” is just silly. No one should believe that shit.

If there is one other alien species besides us in the universe, then It is very likely that there are several.

Like all intelligent entities (including cellular life, plants, animals and humans) these alien species would be subject to the rules of the game theory. Game theory comes out of the mathematical analysis of cooperative behavior versus competitive behavior. Cooperative strategies always have a higher long term pay off than cheating strategies. Creating relationships based on trust is always more successful than distrusting everyone around you.

Whether or not you believe that the cooperative instinct comes out of mathematics or spirituality or evolution doesn’t matter. Tit for tat is always the best strategy in any competitive game where people or groups pair up for cooperative exchanges. If someone is nice to you must ALWAYS return the favor and be nice in return. If someone does something bad to you must immediately punish them. Hopefully, the punishment encourages them to return to cooperative behavior.

What game theory teaches you is that over the long term, a cooperative strategy is always the better choice over a competitive strategy. Even if an alien species were only 100 years ahead of humanity in their level of technology, they could very likely destroy humanity in an instant if they wanted it to. However, they wouldn’t come down to earth insurance with laser guns one by one. They could Use a biological weapon, redirect an astroid towards earth or just drop their version of atomic weapons on us. A high energy neutron weapon would kill all of us but it would knockdown very few buildings or structures.

But aliens don’t destroy us and they likely won’t. Why not? Because they would face punishment from another species. How many children go out of their way to walk into the park and destroy an ant hill. Only a few and if you saw a child pouring gasoline onto an ant hill you would stop that child and scold them. The child might claim that the ants’ lives don’t matter. However, the ants lived in that park before the child got there and so they too have a right to exist.

Some philosophers believe that game theory is the source of morality. If so, then morality must literally be universal. Any semi-intelligent species would understand the rules of morality and the number one rule would be the golden rule of planetary invasion. Would you like it if another advanced extra terrestrial species invaded your planet? Of course not, so in turn it’s never OK to invade other planets.

So the universal golden rule is one species can’t just invade and take over another planets and destroy any entities that are already on it. If humanity went to Mars and discovered a microbe that was harmful to human life and we wiped out that microbe, that would also be immoral.

In any case, given that there is more than one alien species they probably hold each other to that golden rule of non-planetary invasion. So for globalists to use a new weapon to blow up Hong Kong and claim “Oh my God, the aliens blew up Hong Kong as a warning to us” is just silly. No one should believe that shit.