Actual text:

Seropositivity estimates for N antibody will underestimate the proportion of the population previously infected due to (i) blood donors are potentially less likely to be exposed to natural infection than age matched individuals in the general population (ii) waning of the N antibody response over time and (iii) recent observations from UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) surveillance data that N antibody levels appear to be lower in individuals who acquire infection following 2 doses of vaccination.

Interpretation by the Doc: "This drop in antibodies is basically permanent!"

(No idea whether this is true or not: can only confirm that this statement is NOT in the report.)

Am skeptical of the information in this analysis by the Doc. It lacks explanation of evidence. Hard to evaluate without more info.

That said, I'm confident the actual reports itself is probably about as credible as a report from the UN Council for Climate Change re: actual environmental impacts. Hocus pocus, modelling and such shite to uphold and promote their agenda.

Actual text:

Seropositivity estimates for N antibody will underestimate the proportion of the population previously infected due to (i) blood donors are potentially less likely to be exposed to natural infection than age matched individuals in the general population (ii) waning of the N antibody response over time and (iii) recent observations from UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) surveillance data that N antibody levels appear to be lower in individuals who acquire infection following 2 doses of vaccination.

Interpretation by the Doc: "This drop in antibodies is basically permanent!"

(No idea whether this is true or not: can only confirm that this statement is NOT in the report.