One of the reasons SCOTUS ruled in 1973 that a woman can pursue an abortion based on privacy issues:

This right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or ... in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy. — Roe, 410 U.S. at 153

Why would they change now? Is it a change in the leanings of the court?

OR

Is it related to vaccine mandates? Can I argue that I don't want to take the vaccine and use Roe v Wade as the legal basis?...unless the SCOTUS weakens this ruling.

One of the reasons SCOTUS ruled in 1973 that a woman can pursue an abortion based on privacy issues:

*This right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or ... in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.

— Roe, 410 U.S. at 153*

Why would they change now? Is it a change in the leanings of the court?

OR

Is it related to vaccine mandates? Can I argue that I don't want to take the vaccine and use Roe v Wade as the legal basis?...unless the SCOTUS weakens this ruling.