that patented code will persist over time as shown by a variety of suppressed studies

Can you provide evidence for this? Everything I have seen seems to fall between inconclusive and completely bogus. So far such ideas and "reports" smack of controlled opposition due to very bad (or non-existent) actual science involved.

After all if you own people outright, it makes it so much easier to decide what you are allowed to do with them later.

A problem I have with this theory is, they already own us by law through our National, State, Township, and personal debt (four levels of legal ownership). We are legally indentured to them.

It is technically impossible for us to release our indenture, as American citizens, because of how "interest" works, i.e. there isn't enough money in the world to buy our freedom. The same system is employed in almost every country in the world. Excepting only those nations that are seen as sovereign (not part of the UN) the whole world is already legally owned.

While it could be that they want more ownership, it's just not a big deal. It wouldn't stand up in any reasonable court, and if all the courts are unreasonable, the above ownership is enough.

that patented code will persist over time as shown by a variety of suppressed studies

Can you provide evidence for this? Everything I have seen seems to fall between inconclusive and completely bogus. So far such ideas and "reports" smack of controlled opposition due to very bad actual science involved.

After all if you own people outright, it makes it so much easier to decide what you are allowed to do with them later.

A problem I have with this theory is, they already own us by law through our National, State, Township, and personal debt (four levels of legal ownership). We are legally indentured to them.

It is technically impossible for us to release our indenture, as American citizens, because of how "interest" works, i.e. there isn't enough money in the world to buy our freedom. The same system is employed in almost every country in the world. Excepting only those nations that are seen as sovereign (not part of the UN) the whole world is already legally owned.

While it could be that they want more ownership, it's just not a big deal. It wouldn't stand up in any reasonable court, and if all the courts are unreasonable, the above ownership is enough.

that patented code will persist over time as shown by a variety of suppressed studies

Can you provide evidence for this? Everything I have seen seems to fall between inconclusive and completely bogus. So far such ideas and "reports" and smack of controlled opposition due to very bad actual science involved.

After all if you own people outright, it makes it so much easier to decide what you are allowed to do with them later.

A problem I have with this theory is, they already own us by law through our National, State, Township, and personal debt (four levels of legal ownership). We are legally indentured to them.

It is technically impossible for us to release our indenture, as American citizens, because of how "interest" works, i.e. there isn't enough money in the world to buy our freedom. The same system is employed in almost every country in the world. Excepting only those nations that are seen as sovereign (not part of the UN) the whole world is already legally owned.

While it could be that they want more ownership, it's just not a big deal. It wouldn't stand up in any reasonable court, and if all the courts are unreasonable, the above ownership is enough.