thank you fren. I appreciate your efforts.

I can not understand your reluctance towards the one year requirement-international laws that the United States has signed on to

I think you misunderstand me. The question is not whether I have some reluctance towards such (I don't) but whether such a one-year requirement (to not engage or respond to a belligerent occupier) actually exists.

I'm listening to other sources now, and the key points have become clearer - the need for not acting against one's own population, doing 'by the book' etc. However, but the source for the "one-year" stipulation still eludes me and the reference to 11.3 I still find .... unenlightening.

thanks again.

thank you fren. I appreciate your efforts.

I can not understand your reluctance towards the one year requirement-international laws that the United States has signed on to

I think you misunderstand me. The question is not whether I have some reluctance towards such (I don't) but whether such a one-year requirement (to not engage or respond to a belligerent occupier) actually exists.

If you can quote me the actual location of such text, law, or treaty that outlines this, I'd be very, very happy. FYI, it is not found in LoW. Or if it is, please indicate where.

That's all.