Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I haven't worked on any chemical manufacturing equipment, but I have designed assembly lines with multiple robotic cells joined together with various types of conveyor belt. Here's how I would think it would work:

All the hard work is done in batches in massive vats. This all occurs on an automated chemical "assembly" line with multiple stages. Ingredients are added in at their predefined stations (some are plumbed in permanently like water and gases) continuously to ensure uninterrupted 24/7 operation. Once the "cooking" back end is setup the concept of "one per second" ceases to matter as you now have a continuous supply of mixed chemical - this is no longer the bottle neck.

The biggest bottleneck would be packaging and storage. Packaging would occur on a robotic cell that fills viles one by one like a bottling plant or dozens at a time using a jig connected to a pressurised injection system. The former would real them off like a machine gun. The latter would require more precision and time but would do more at once. The viles would then be amalgamated together and loaded into a refrigerated truck that is waiting there all the time.

If you have sufficient redundancy built in that allows for maintenance during operation and an efficient just-in-time (JIT) supply chain you'd have a very fast and reliable human genocide machine.

Edit: this is not just one facility mind you, these would be scattered across the world working in parallel. I'm also not ruling out saline or some preproduction, just pointing out that one dose per second grossly underestimates the output capability of these facilities.

2 years ago
4 score
Reason: None provided.

I haven't worked on any chemical manufacturing equipment, but I have designed assembly lines with multiple robotic cells joined together with various types of conveyor belt. Here's how I would think it would work:

All the hard work is done in batches in massive vats. This all occurs on an automated chemical "assembly" line with multiple stages. Ingredients are added in at their predefined stations (some are plumbed in permanently like water and gases) continuously to ensure uninterrupted 24/7 operation. Once the "cooking" back end is setup the concept of "one per second" ceases to matter as you now have a continuous supply of mixed chemical - this is no longer the bottle neck.

The biggest bottleneck would be packaging and storage. Packaging would occur on a robotic cell that fills viles one by one like a bottling plant or dozens at a time using a jig connected to a pressurised injection system. The former would real them off like a machine gun. The latter would require more precision and time but would do more at once. The viles would then be amalgamated together and loaded into a refrigerated truck that is waiting there all the time.

If you have sufficient redundancy built in that allows for maintenance during operation and an efficient just-in-time (JIT) supply chain you'd have a very fast and reliable human genocide machine.

Edit: this is not just one facility mind you, these would be scattered across the world working in parallel.

2 years ago
4 score
Reason: Original

I haven't worked on any chemical manufacturing equipment, but I have designed assembly lines with multiple robotic cells joined together with various types of conveyor belt. Here's how I would think it would work:

All the hard work is done in batches in massive vats. This all occurs on an automated chemical "assembly" line with multiple stages. Ingredients are added in at their predefined stations (some are plumbed in permanently like water and gases) continuously to ensure uninterrupted 24/7 operation. Once the "cooking" back end is setup the concept of "one per second" ceases to matter as you now have a continuous supply of mixed chemical - this is no longer the bottle neck.

The biggest bottleneck would be packaging and storage. Packaging would occur on a robotic cell that fills viles one by one like a bottling plant or dozens at a time using a jig connected to a pressurised injection system. The former would real them off like a machine gun. The latter would require more precision and time but would do more at once. The viles would then be amalgamated together and loaded into a refrigerated truck that is waiting there all the time.

If you have sufficient redundancy built in that allows for maintenance during operation and an efficient just-in-time (JIT) supply chain you'd have a very fast and reliable human genocide machine.

2 years ago
1 score