Very good post. I am also looking forward to seeing what TRUTH Social looks like. However, the "free speech" trap the liberals have set up for us will also be an impediment.

After decades of errant Supreme Court decisions, the people have been led to believe that "free speech" means you can be as offensive as you want anywhere you want all the time. This includes private establishments and websites, and any place where words can be used to harm the cohesiveness of a society.

This twisted definition of free speech means you are forced to celebrate the most vile racist, bigoted and hateful speech an idiot can post.

How will TRUTH Social handle free speech? If the Trump Administration negotiation with Gab is any indication, this will mean no criticism of Jews will be allowed.

Of course there should be allowed criticism of Israel and any other countries' political and cultural values. The manner in which it is done is key. Does the post amount to nothing more than hate-mongering of a particular race or tribe? Or does it enlighten the reader as to the reasons why there is conflict, and let them make up their own mind? It's one of the most difficult questions in publishing today. I am expecting the Trump Administration to fail on this one. They will not allow any criticism of Israel or other political allies, period.

Is unlimited profanity and bullying in the best interests of a free speech website? I would say no, as it brings the beginning of the end for shutting down the site eventually. It would discourage the best kind of people from joining. And it offers no positive benefit except allowing someone to shoot off their mouth maliciously while hiding behind their keyboard.

Will TRUTH Social allow regular folks to have a two-way conversation with POTUS? I kind of doubt that. Look at what happened with Frank Speech. It's really only what Mike Lindell wants to say. It's not two way. I think it would be the same with TRUTH Social. Just official announcements and some limited discussions if kept tightly within bounds of not criticizing Isreal in any way. That's not a winning formula.

And that they're looking to California for an automated method to control malicious posting shows they're probably not up to the task.

Very good post. I am also looking forward to seeing what TRUTH Social looks like. However, the "free speech" trap the liberals have set up for us will also be an impediment.

After decades of errant Supreme Court decisions, the people have been led to believe that "free speech" means you can be as offensive as you want anywhere you want all the time. This includes private establishments and websites, and any place where words can be used to harm the cohesiveness of a society.

This twisted definition of free speech means you are forced to celebrate the most vile racist, bigoted and hateful speech an idiot can post.

How will TRUTH Social handle free speech? If the Trump Administration negotiation with Gab is any indication, this will mean no criticism of Jews will be allowed.

Of course there should be allowed criticism of Israel and any other countries' political and cultural values. The manner in which it is done is key. Does the post amount to nothing more than hate-mongering of a particular race or tribe? Or does it enlighten the reader as to the reasons why there is conflict, and let them make up their own mind? It's one of the most difficult questions in publishing today. I am expecting the Trump Administration to fail on this one. They will not allow any criticism of Israel or other political allies, period.

Is unlimited profanity and bullying in the best interests of a free speech website? I would say no, as it brings the beginning of the end for shutting down the site eventually. It would discourage the best kind of people from joining. And it offers no positive benefit except allowing someone to shoot off their mouth maliciously while hiding behind their keyboard.

Will TRUTH Social allow regular folks to have a two-way conversation with POTUS? I kind of doubt that. Look at what happened with Frank Speech. It's really only what Mike Lindell wants to say. It's not two way. I think it would be the same with TRUTH Social. Just official announcements and some limited discussions if kept tightly within bounds of not criticizing Isreal in any way. That's not a winning formula.

And that they're looking to California for an automated method to control malicious posting shows they're not probably up to the task.

Very good post. I am also looking forward to seeing what TRUTH Social looks like. However, the "free speech" trap the liberals have set up for us will also be an impediment.

After decades of errant Supreme Court decisions, the people have been led to believe that "free speech" means you can be as offensive as you want anywhere you want all the time. This includes private establishments and websites, and any place where words can be used to harm the cohesiveness of a society.

This twisted definition of free speech means you are forced to celebrate the most vile racist, bigoted and hateful speech an idiot can post.

How will TRUTH Social handle free speech? If the Trump Administration negotiation with Gab is any indication, this will mean no criticism of Jews will be allowed.

Of course there should be allowed criticism of Israel and any other countries' political and cultural values. The manner in which it is done is key. Does the post amount to nothing more than hate-mongering of a particular race or tribe? Or does it enlighten the reader as to the reasons why there is conflict, and let them make up their own mind? It's one of the most difficult questions in publishing today. I am expecting the Trump Administration to fail on this one. They will not allow any criticism of Israel or other political allies, period.

Is unlimited profanity and bullying in the best interests of a free speech website? I would say no, as it brings the beginning of the end for shutting down the site eventually. It would discourage the best kind of people from joining. And it offers no positive benefit except allowing someone to shoot off their mouth maliciously while hiding behind their keyboard.

Will TRUTH Social allow regular folks to have a two-way conversation with POTUS? I kind of doubt that. Look at what happened with Frank Speech. It's really only what Mike Lindell wants to say. It's not two way. I think it would be the same with TRUTH Social. Just official announcements and some limited discussions if kept tightly within bounds of not criticizing Isreal in any way. That's not a winning formula.

Is that they're looking to California for an automated method to control malicious posting shows they're not probably up to the task.

Very good post. I am also looking forward to seeing what TRUTH Social looks like. However, the "free speech" trap the liberals have set up for us will also be an impediment.

After decades of errant Supreme Court decisions, the people have been led to believe that "free speech" means you can be as offensive as you want anywhere you want all the time. This includes private establishments and websites, and any place where words can be used to harm the cohesiveness of a society.

This twisted definition of free speech means you are forced to celebrate the most vile racist, bigoted and hateful speech an idiot can post.

How will TRUTH Social handle free speech? If the Trump Administration negotiation with Gab is any indication, this will mean no criticism of Jews will be allowed.

Of course there should be allowed criticism of Israel and any other countries' political and cultural values. The manner in which it is done is key. Does the post amount to nothing more than hate-mongering of a particular race or tribe? Or does it enlighten the reader as to the reasons why there is conflict, and let them make up their own mind? It's one of the most difficult questions in publishing today. I am expecting the Trump Administration to fail on this one. They will not allow any criticism of Israel or other political allies, period.

Is unlimited profanity and bullying in the best interests of a free speech website? I would say no, as it brings the beginning of the end for shutting down the site eventually. It would discourage the best kind of people from joining. And it offers no positive benefit except allowing someone to shoot off their mouth maliciously while hiding behind their keyboard.

Will TRUTH Social allow regular folks to have a two-way conversation with POTUS? I kind of doubt that. Look at what happened with Frank Speech. It's really only what Mike Lindell wants to say. It's not two way. I think it would be the same with TRUTH Social. Just official announcements and some limited discussions if kept tightly within bounds of not criticizing Isreal in any way. That's not a winning formula.

Very good post. I am also looking forward to seeing what TRUTH Social looks like. However, the "free speech" trap the liberals have set up for us will also be an impediment.

After decades of errant Supreme Court decisions, the people have been led to believe that "free speech" means you can be as offensive as you want anywhere you want all the time. This includes private establishments and websites, and any place where words can be used to harm the cohesiveness of a society.

This twisted definition of free speech means you are forced to celebrate the most vile racist, bigoted and hateful speech an idiot can post.

How will TRUTH Social handle free speech? If the Trump Administration negotiation with Gab is any indication, this will mean no criticism of Jews will be allowed.

Of course there should be allowed criticism of Israel and any other countries' political and cultural values. The manner in which it is done is key. Does the post amount to nothing more than hate-mongering of a particular race or tribe? Or does it enlighten the reader as to the reasons why there is conflict, and let them make up their own mind? It's one of the most difficult questions in publishing today. I am expecting the Trump Administration to fail on this one. They will not allow any criticism of Israel or other political allies, period.

Is unlimited profanity and bullying in the best interests of a free speech website? I would say no, as it brings the beginning of the end for shutting down the site eventually. And it offers no positive benefit except allowing someone to shoot off their mouth maliciously while hiding behind their keyboard.

Will TRUTH Social allow regular folks to have a two-way conversation with POTUS? I kind of doubt that. Look at what happened with Frank Speech. It's really only what Mike Lindell wants to say. It's not two way. I think it would be the same with TRUTH Social. Just official announcements and some limited discussions if kept tightly within bounds of not criticizing his Isreal. That's not a winning formula.