Actually, I think you are the one (among others in this thread) who is being obtuse.
You have NOT addressed GME's financials. It loses money. It has a burn rate that will put it into bankruptcy without a bailout ... SOON.
What do you have to say about THAT?
Regarding GME/XRT --
I have NOT said that nobody at all is shorting XRT naked. Obviously, somebody is. But what evidence do you have that it is GME shorts doing it?
Just because XRT is being naked shorted, it does not mean the shorts are doing it because they want to be short GME. Maybe a chunk of it is those guys, but what evidence do you have it is them?
Seems like hopeful wishes. Somebody ran up GME a year ago, and came up with the naked short story. That was TRUE ... back then. But since those positions have been unwound, the story shifted to XRT being manipulated BECAUSE of GME.
Did you READ the SEC paper? It was talking about the 2012-2014 timeframe. The problem has been around A LONG time -- long before GME became a public stock.
When I was saying before that "they would not do it," I was not talking about the GME short sellers. I was also not talking about XRT short sellers.
Some of the people in this thread wrote in such a way that made it seem like it was the money managers of XRT (which is EXACTLY what I wrote) being involved in using XRT money to short GME within the XRT fund itself.
I said that THAT would not happen. Now, I realize you guys are not talking about that. You are talking about short sellers shorting shares of XRT. So, the XRT managers don't have anything to do with that (although, they should be aware of this, and blowing the whistle, but they don't seem to be).
I just came to this story yesterday. You guys are not exactly clearly laying out the case for your position. You are the only one who has actually explained anything. Everyone else in this thread is nothing more than a cheerleader.
Let's get some pom poms for queball. ;-)
Now that I understand you are talking about the manipulation of XRT shares, and not the XRT management manipulating GME shares, your story makes more sense. Not that I agree with it, but at least it is not complete lunacy.
You refuse to comment on the very blatant 90 day cycle.
I wrote in one of these posts that the 90-day cycle is tied to the earnings cycle. A big run up, and then melt down. MOST stocks are tied to their earnings cycle. This is a good time for shorts to exit their positions, as the price and volume both go up. But it does not prove anything. You don't like my answer, but I DID address it.
You refuse to comment on the swaps that they are using that took out Archegos and put a huge loss on Credit Suisse.
I have not looked into it. So, I can't comment on it.
You refuse to comment on the CFTC making those swaps hidden to the public until 2023
That is corruption at its finest. There may be some fuckery going on. But guess what?
THAT DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACT THAT THE COMPANY IS A DOG SHIT COMPANY, LOSING MONEY, READY FOR BANKRUPTCY ... AND YOU HAVE REFUSED TO ADDRESS THAT.
You refuse to comment on the crazy amount of FTDs on MEME as well.
MEME has fewer assets than the trailer park that queball lives in.
Question: Other than MEME, XRT, and any other funds that own GME, what OTHER funds ALSO have these FTD's?
If there are none, then you might have something. But since Goldman Sachs makes MOST (maybe all) of its profits from lending out "hard to borrow" securities, you can be sure that GME, XRT, and MEME are not the ONLY stocks and funds that have massive amounts of fake shares.
What do the FTD's show about all the stocks and funds out there? It is is ONLY GME-related, you might have something.
I guarantee you did not look at the link I sent you with all manner of Due Diligence on GME.
You're damn right, because you did not tell me what was in there. Remember, I don't give a FUCK about GME, one way or the other. I noticed the Jim Cramer thread, and responded. My FIRST post was about what a doofus Cramer is, but other than that I thought everything else in the OP was bullshit.
That's when the knives were thrown at me.
I have ZERO interest in any in-depth DD of GME. It's an intersting story ... MILDLY ... but if you are not going to explain what the hell I am supposed to be looking at, I am not going to spend the time to dig through it.
I spent time reading the SEC paper. I read the first half.
Did YOU read it? I bet if you did, you are the ONLY one in this thread who did.
Wild goose chases are not my thing. If you can point to something SPECIFIC (which I asked you to do about the SEC paper, and you did not do), then I might take a look. Otherwise, nah.
I know I will not change your mind. The point of this was to show everyone else how much you and others like you do not know nor understand about this play.
Again, I don't give a FUCK about GME. Therefore, OF COURSE it is true that I would not know everything that all of you, who have been following it for more than a year, would know.
BUT ...
I quickly found out (within less than a minute) that the company LOSES MONEY. And that they have a BURN RATE LEADING TO BANKRUPTCY.
And ... YOU HAVE NOT ADDRESSED THIS AT ALL.
The ONLY person in this thread who responded about the financials ... had EVERYTHING WRONG. Don't you think that is ... I dunno ... weird?
IF all these naked shorts exist, all they have to do is hold out until the company is out of money and cannot find a big whale to prop them up. At that point, ALL the shares become worthless, and the shorts simply close out their positions and have a nice vacation on the yacht.
The longs, OTOH, have a VERY tough road to go. The ONLY hope it seems is the mythical BIG SHORT SQUEEZE ... that was supposed to happen over a year ago. But the stock is DOWN 80% from then, in a market that is UP during that same time.
Why do you continue to IGNORE the fundamental of the BUSINESS that the stock represents? That tells me A LOT about you and the others here.
This is not a traditional investor play, this is the mother of all short squeezes due to the funds fucking up.
Well guess what? IF that happens ... I will probably make money on it, just like you.
But what I WON'T do is ... be a bag holder for more than a year, down 80%, and THEN smile about the big move up. No ...
IF a massive short squeeze happens, I will SEE it on my chart, just like I did last year. I MIGHT wait for the inevitable pullback, and then take a ride along with you.
But in the meantime, I have my money elsewhere ... and NOT LOSING 80% SITTING ON A DOG SHIT COMPANY FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR.
If you want to address the horrible financials of the company, I would be interested in seeing what you have to say. Because THAT is the ultimate test. Can they turn it around? If so, how exactly?
If you cannot do that, then I have no further interest in speculating about "secret short sellers." They might exist. You might be right.
But it has not made you any money, has it?
It is a lot smarter to WAIT for it to make its move, rather than sitting on a big 80% crash.
It is already down 80%. There is no reason it can't go 100%.
Actually, I think you are the one (among others in this thread) who is being obtuse.
You have NOT addressed GME's financials. It loses money. It has a burn rate that will put it into bankruptcy without a bailout ... SOON.
What do you have to say about THAT?
Regarding GME/XRT --
I have NOT said that nobody at all is shorting XRT naked. Obviously, somebody is. But what evidence do you have that it is GME shorts doing it?
Just because XRT is being naked shorted, it does not mean the shorts are doing it because they want to be short GME. Maybe a chunk of it is those guys, but what evidence do you have it is them?
Seems like hopeful wishes. Somebody ran up GME a year ago, and came up with the naked short story. That was TRUE ... back then. But since those positions have been unwound, the story shifted to XRT being manipulated BECAUSE of GME.
Did you READ the SEC paper? It was talking about the 2012-2014 timeframe. The problem has been around A LONG time -- long before GME became a public stock.
When I was saying before that "they would not do it," I was not talking about the GME short sellers. I was also not talking about XRT short sellers.
Some of the people in this thread wrote in such a way that made it seem like it was the money managers of XRT (which is EXACTLY what I wrote) being involved in using XRT money to short GME within the XRT fund itself.
I said that THAT would not happen. Now, I realize you guys are not talking about that. You are talking about short sellers shorting shares of XRT. So, the XRT managers don't have anything to do with that (although, they should be aware of this, and blowing the whistle, but they don't seem to be).
I just came to this story yesterday. You guys are not exactly clearly laying out the case for your position. You are the only one who has actually explained anything. Everyone else in this thread is nothing more than a cheerleader.
Let's get some pom poms for queball. ;-)
Now that I understand you are talking about the manipulation of XRT shares, and not the XRT management manipulating GME shares, your story makes more sense. Not that I agree with it, but at least it is not complete lunacy.
You refuse to comment on the very blatant 90 day cycle.
I wrote in one of these posts that the 90-day cycle is tied to the earnings cycle. A big run up, and then melt down. MOST stocks are tied to their earnings cycle. This is a good time for shorts to exit their positions, as the price and volume both go up. But it does not prove anything. You don't like my answer, but I DID address it.
You refuse to comment on the swaps that they are using that took out Archegos and put a huge loss on Credit Suisse.
I have not looked into it. So, I can't comment on it.
You refuse to comment on the CFTC making those swaps hidden to the public until 2023
That is corruption at its finest. There may be some fuckery going on. But guess what?
THAT DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACT THAT THE COMPANY IS A DOG SHIT COMPANY, LOSING MONEY, READY FOR BANKRUPTCY ... AND YOU HAVE REFUSED TO ADDRESS THAT.
You refuse to comment on the crazy amount of FTDs on MEME as well.
MEME has fewer assets than the trailer park that queball lives in.
Question: Other than MEME, XRT, and any other funds that own GME, what OTHER funds ALSO have these FTD's?
If there are none, then you might have something. But since Goldman Sachs makes MOST (maybe all) of its profits from lending out "hard to borrow" securities, you can be sure that GME, XRT, and MEME are not the ONLY stocks and funds that have massive amounts of fake shares.
What do the FTD's show about all the stocks and funds out there? It is is ONLY GME-related, you might have something.
I guarantee you did not look at the link I sent you with all manner of Due Diligence on GME.
You're damn right, because you did not tell me what was in there. Remember, I don't give a FUCK about GME, one way or the other. I noticed the Jim Cramer thread, and responded. My FIRST post was about what a doofus Cramer is, but other than that I thought everything else in the OP was bullshit.
That's when the knives were thrown at me.
I have ZERO interest in any in-depth DD of GME. It's an intersting story ... MILDLY ... but if you are not going to explain what the hell I am supposed to be looking at, I am not going to spend the time to dig through it.
I spent time reading the SEC paper. I read the first half.
Did YOU read it? I bet if you did, you are the ONLY one in this thread who did.
Wild goose chases are not my thing. If you can point to something SPECIFIC (which I asked you to do about the SEC paper, and you did not do), then I might take a look. Otherwise, nah.
I know I will not change your mind. The point of this was to show everyone else how much you and others like you do not know nor understand about this play.
Again, I don't give a FUCK about GME. Therefore, OF COURSE it is true that I would not know everything that all of you, who have been following it for more than a year, would know.
BUT ...
I quickly found out (within less than a minute) that the company LOSES MONEY. And that they have a BURN RATE LEADING TO BANKRUPTCY.
And ... YOU HAVE NOT ADDRESSED THIS AT ALL.
The ONLY person in this thread who responded about the financials ... had EVERYTHING WRONG. Don't you think that is ... I dunno ... weird?
IF all these naked shorts exist, all they have to do is hold out until the company is out of money and cannot find a big whale to prop them up. At that point, ALL the shares become worthless, and the shorts simply close out their positions and have a nice vacation on the yacht.
The longs, OTOH, have a VERY tough road to go. The ONLY hope it seems is the mythical BIG SHORT SQUEEZE ... that was supposed to happen over a year ago. But the stock is DOWN 80% from then, in a market that is UP during that same time.
Why do you continue to IGNORE the fundamental of the BUSINESS that the stock represents? That tells me A LOT about you and the others here.
This is not a traditional investor play, this is the mother of all short squeezes due to the funds fucking up.
Well guess what? IF that happens ... I will probably make money on it, just like you.
But what I WON'T do is ... be a bag holder for more than a year, down 80%, and THEN smile about the big move up. No ...
IF a massive short squeeze happens, I will SEE it on my chart, just like I did last year. I MIGHT wait for the inevitable pullback, and then take a ride along with you.
But in the meantime, I have my money elsewhere ... and NOT LOSING 80% SITTING ON A DOG SHIT COMPANY FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR.
If you want to address the horrible financials of the company, I would be interested in seeing what you have to say. Because THAT is the ultimate test. Can they turn it around? If so, how exactly?
If you cannot do that, then I have no further interest in speculating about "secret short sellers." They might exist. You might be right.
But it has not made you any money, has it?
Just waiting for it to make its move is a hell of a lot more profitable than sitting on the big crash.
It is already down 80%. There is no reason it can't go 100%.
Actually, I think you are the one (among others in this thread) who is being obtuse.
You have NOT addressed GME's financials. It loses money. It has a burn rate that will put it into bankruptcy without a bailout ... SOON.
What do you have to say about THAT?
Regarding GME/XRT --
I have NOT said that nobody at all is shorting XRT naked. Obviously, somebody is. But what evidence do you have that it is GME shorts doing it?
Just because XRT is being naked shorted, it does not mean the shorts are doing it because they want to be short GME. Maybe a chunk of it is those guys, but what evidence do you have it is them?
Seems like hopeful wishes. Somebody ran up GME a year ago, and came up with the naked short story. That was TRUE ... back then. But since those positions have been unwound, the story shifted to XRT being manipulated BECAUSE of GME.
Did you READ the SEC paper? It was talking about the 2012-2014 timeframe. The problem has been around A LONG time -- long before GME became a public stock.
When I was saying before that "they would not do it," I was not talking about the GME short sellers. I was also not talking about XRT short sellers.
Some of the people in this thread wrote in such a way that made it seem like it was the money managers of XRT (which is EXACTLY what I wrote) being involved in using XRT money to short GME within the XRT fund itself.
I said that THAT would not happen. Now, I realize you guys are not talking about that. You are talking about short sellers shorting shares of XRT. So, the XRT managers don't have anything to do with that (although, they should be aware of this, and blowing the whistle, but they don't seem to be).
I just came to this story yesterday. You guys are not exactly clearly laying out the case for your position. You are the only one who has actually explained anything. Everyone else in this thread is nothing more than a cheerleader.
Let's get some pom poms for queball. ;-)
Now that I understand you are talking about the manipulation of XRT shares, and not the XRT management manipulating GME shares, your story makes more sense. Not that I agree with it, but at least it is not complete lunacy.
You refuse to comment on the very blatant 90 day cycle.
I wrote in one of these posts that the 90-day cycle is tied to the earnings cycle. A big run up, and then melt down. MOST stocks are tied to their earnings cycle. This is a good time for shorts to exit their positions, as the price and volume both go up. But it does not prove anything. You don't like my answer, but I DID address it.
You refuse to comment on the swaps that they are using that took out Archegos and put a huge loss on Credit Suisse.
I have not looked into it. So, I can't comment on it.
You refuse to comment on the CFTC making those swaps hidden to the public until 2023
That is corruption at its finest. There may be some fuckery going on. But guess what?
THAT DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACT THAT THE COMPANY IS A DOG SHIT COMPANY, LOSING MONEY, READY FOR BANKRUPTCY ... AND YOU HAVE REFUSED TO ADDRESS THAT.
You refuse to comment on the crazy amount of FTDs on MEME as well.
MEME has fewer assets than the trailer park that queball lives in.
Question: Other than MEME, XRT, and any other funds that own GME, what OTHER funds ALSO have these FTD's?
If there are none, then you might have something. But since Goldman Sachs makes MOST (maybe all) of its profits from lending out "hard to borrow" securities, you can be sure that GME, XRT, and MEME are not the ONLY stocks and funds that have massive amounts of fake shares.
What do the FTD's show about all the stocks and funds out there? It is is ONLY GME-related, you might have something.
I guarantee you did not look at the link I sent you with all manner of Due Diligence on GME.
You're damn right, because you did not tell me what was in there. Remember, I don't give a FUCK about GME, one way or the other. I noticed the Jim Cramer thread, and responded. My FIRST post was about what a doofus Cramer is, but other than that I thought everything else in the OP was bullshit.
That's when the knives were thrown at me.
I have ZERO interest in any in-depth DD of GME. It's an intersting story ... MILDLY ... but if you are not going to explain what the hell I am supposed to be looking at, I am not going to spend the time to dig through it.
I spent time reading the SEC paper. I read the first half.
Did YOU read it? I bet if you did, you are the ONLY one in this thread who did.
Wild goose chases are not my thing. If you can point to something SPECIFIC (which I asked you to do about the SEC paper, and you did not do), then I might take a look. Otherwise, nah.
I know I will not change your mind. The point of this was to show everyone else how much you and others like you do not know nor understand about this play.
Again, I don't give a FUCK about GME. Therefore, OF COURSE it is true that I would not know everything that all of you, who have been following it for more than a year, would know.
BUT ...
I quickly found out (within less than a minute) that the company LOSES MONEY. And that they have a BURN RATE LEADING TO BANKRUPTCY.
And ... YOU HAVE NOT ADDRESSED THIS AT ALL.
The ONLY person in this thread who responded about the financials ... had EVERYTHING WRONG. Don't you think that is ... I dunno ... weird?
IF all these naked shorts exist, all they have to do is hold out until the company is out of money and cannot find a big whale to prop them up. At that point, ALL the shares become worthless, and the shorts simply close out their positions and have a nice vacation on the yacht.
The longs, OTOH, have a VERY tough road to go. The ONLY hope it seems is the mythical BIG SHORT SQUEEZE ... that was supposed to happen over a year ago. But the stock is DOWN 80% from then, in a market that is UP during that same time.
Why do you continue to IGNORE the fundamental of the BUSINESS that the stock represents? That tells me A LOT about you and the others here.
This is not a traditional investor play, this is the mother of all short squeezes due to the funds fucking up.
Well guess what? IF that happens ... I will probably make more money on it that you.
IF a massive short squeeze happens, I will SEE it on my chart, just like I did last year. I MIGHT wait for the inevitable pullback, and then take a ride along with you.
But in the meantime, I have my money elsewhere ... and NOT LOSING 80% SITTING ON A DOG SHIT COMPANY FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR.
If you want to address the horrible financials of the company, I would be interested in seeing what you have to say. Because THAT is the ultimate test. Can they turn it around? If so, how exactly?
If you cannot do that, then I have no further interest in speculating about "secret short sellers." They might exist. You might be right.
But it has not made you any money, has it?
Just waiting for it to make its move is a hell of a lot more profitable than sitting on the big crash.
It is already down 80%. There is no reason it can't go 100%.
Actually, I think you are the one (among others in this thread) who is being obtuse.
You have NOT addressed GME's financials. It loses money. It has a burn rate that will put it into bankruptcy without a bailout ... SOON.
What do you have to say about THAT?
Regarding GME/XRT --
I have NOT said that nobody at all is shorting XRT naked. Obviously, somebody is. But what evidence do you have that it is GME shorts doing it?
Just because XRT is being naked shorted, it does not mean the shorts are doing it because they want to be short GME. Maybe a chunk of it is those guys, but what evidence do you have it is them?
Seems like hopeful wishes. Somebody ran up GME a year ago, and came up with the naked short story. That was TRUE ... back then. But since those positions have been unwound, the story shifted to XRT being manipulated BECAUSE of GME.
Did you READ the SEC paper? It was talking about the 2012-2014 timeframe. The problem has been around A LONG time -- long before GME became a public stock.
When I was saying before that "they would not do it," I was not talking about the GME short sellers. I was also not talking about XRT short sellers.
Some of the people in this thread wrote in such a way that made it seem like it was the money managers of XRT (which is EXACTLY what I wrote) being involved in using XRT money to short GME within the XRT fund itself.
I said that THAT would not happen. Now, I realize you guys are not talking about that. You are talking about short sellers shorting shares of XRT. So, the XRT managers don't have anything to do with that (although, they should be aware of this, and blowing the whistle, but they don't seem to be).
I just came to this story yesterday. You guys are not exactly clearly laying out the case for your position. You are the only one who has actually explained anything. Everyone else in this thread is nothing more than a cheerleader.
Let's get some pom poms for queball. ;-)
Now that I understand you are talking about the manipulation of XRT shares, and not the XRT management manipulating GME shares, your story makes more sense. Not that I agree with it, but at least it is not complete lunacy.
You refuse to comment on the very blatant 90 day cycle.
I wrote in one of these posts that the 90-day cycle is tied to the earnings cycle. A big run up, and then melt down. MOST stocks are tied to their earnings cycle. This is a good time for shorts to exit their positions, as the price and volume both go up. But it does not prove anything. You don't like my answer, but I DID address it.
You refuse to comment on the swaps that they are using that took out Archegos and put a huge loss on Credit Suisse.
I have not looked into it. So, I can't comment on it.
You refuse to comment on the CFTC making those swaps hidden to the public until 2023
That is corruption at its finest. There may be some fuckery going on. But guess what?
THAT DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACT THAT THE COMPANY IS A DOG SHIT COMPANY, LOSING MONEY, READY FOR BANKRUPTCY ... AND YOU HAVE REFUSED TO ADDRESS THAT.
You refuse to comment on the crazy amount of FTDs on MEME as well.
MEME has fewer assets than the trailer park that queball lives in.
Question: Other than MEME, XRT, and any other funds that own GME, what OTHER funds ALSO have these FTD's?
If there are none, then you might have something. But since Goldman Sachs makes MOST (maybe all) of its profits from lending out "hard to borrow" securities, you can be sure that GME, XRT, and MEME are not the ONLY stocks and funds that have massive amounts of fake shares.
What do the FTD's show about all the stocks and funds out there? It is is ONLY GME-related, you might have something.
I guarantee you did not look at the link I sent you with all manner of Due Diligence on GME.
You're damn right, because you did not tell me what was in there. Remember, I don't give a FUCK about GME, one way or the other. I noticed the Jim Cramer thread, and responded. My FIRST post was about what a doofus Cramer is, but other than that I thought everything else in the OP was bullshit.
That's when the knives were thrown at me.
I have ZERO interest in any in-depth DD of GME. It's an intersting story ... MILDLY ... but if you are not going to explain what the hell I am supposed to be looking at, I am not going to spend the time to dig through it.
I spent time reading the SEC paper. I read the first half.
Did YOU read it? I bet if you did, you are the ONLY one in this thread who did.
Wild goose chases are not my thing. If you can point to something SPECIFIC (which I asked you to do about the SEC paper, and you did not do), then I might take a look. Otherwise, nah.
I know I will not change your mind. The point of this was to show everyone else how much you and others like you do not know nor understand about this play.
Again, I don't give a FUCK about GME. Therefore, OF COURSE it is true that I would not know everything that all of you, who have been following it for more than a year, would know.
BUT ...
I quickly found out (within less than a minute) that the company LOSES MONEY. And that they have a BURN RATE LEADING TO BANKRUPTCY.
And ... YOU HAVE NOT ADDRESSED THIS AT ALL.
IF all these naked shorts exist, all they have to do is hold out until the company is out of money and cannot find a big whale to prop them up. At that point, ALL the shares become worthless, and the shorts simply close out their positions and have a nice vacation on the yacht.
The longs, OTOH, have a VERY tough road to go. The ONLY hope it seems is the mythical BIG SHORT SQUEEZE ... that was supposed to happen over a year ago. But the stock is DOWN 80% from then, in a market that is UP during that same time.
Why do you continue to IGNORE the fundamental of the BUSINESS that the stock represents? That tells me A LOT about you and the others here.
This is not a traditional investor play, this is the mother of all short squeezes due to the funds fucking up.
Well guess what? IF that happens ... I will probably make more money on it that you.
IF a massive short squeeze happens, I will SEE it on my chart, just like I did last year. I MIGHT wait for the inevitable pullback, and then take a ride along with you.
But in the meantime, I have my money elsewhere ... and NOT LOSING 80% SITTING ON A DOG SHIT COMPANY FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR.
If you want to address the horrible financials of the company, I would be interested in seeing what you have to say. Because THAT is the ultimate test. Can they turn it around? If so, how exactly?
If you cannot do that, then I have no further interest in speculating about "secret short sellers." They might exist. You might be right.
But it has not made you any money, has it?
Just waiting for it to make its move is a hell of a lot more profitable than sitting on the big crash.
It is already down 80%. There is no reason it can't go 100%.
Actually, I think you are the one (among others in this thread) who is being obtuse.
You have NOT addressed GME's financials. It loses money. It has a burn rate that will put it into bankruptcy without a bailout ... SOON.
What do you have to say about THAT?
Regarding GME/XRT --
I have NOT said that nobody at all is shorting XRT naked. Obviously, somebody is. But what evidence do you have that it is GME shorts doing it?
Just because XRT is being naked shorted, it does not mean the shorts are doing it because they want to be short GME. Maybe a chunk of it is those guys, but what evidence do you have it is them?
Seems like hopeful wishes. Somebody ran up GME a year ago, and came up with the naked short story. That was TRUE ... back then. But since those positions have been unwound, the story shifted to XRT being manipulated BECAUSE of GME.
Did you READ the SEC paper? It was talking about the 2012-2014 timeframe. The problem has been around A LONG time -- long before GME became a public stock.
When I was saying before that "they would not do it," I was not talking about the GME short sellers. I was also not talking about XRT short sellers.
Some of the people in this thread wrote in such a way that made it seem like it was the money managers of XRT (which is EXACTLY what I wrote) being involved in using XRT money to short GME within the XRT fund itself.
I said that THAT would not happen. Now, I realize you guys are not talking about that. You are talking about short sellers shorting shares of XRT. So, the XRT managers don't have anything to do with that (although, they should be aware of this, and blowing the whistle, but they don't seem to be).
I just came to this story yesterday. You guys are not exactly clearly laying out the case for your position. You are the only one who has actually explained anything. Everyone else in this thread is nothing more than a cheerleader.
Let's get some pom poms for queball. ;-)
Now that I understand you are talking about the manipulation of XRT shares, and not the XRT management manipulating GME shares, your story makes more sense. Not that I agree with it, but at least it is not complete lunacy.
You refuse to comment on the very blatant 90 day cycle.
I wrote in one of these posts that the 90-day cycle is tied to the earnings cycle. A big run up, and then melt down. MOST stocks are tied to their earnings cycle. This is a good time for shorts to exit their positions, as the price and volume both go up. But it does not prove anything. You don't like my answer, but I DID address it.
You refuse to comment on the swaps that they are using that took out Archegos and put a huge loss on Credit Suisse.
I have not looked into it. So, I can't comment on it.
You refuse to comment on the CFTC making those swaps hidden to the public until 2023
That is corruption at its finest. There may be some fuckery going on. But guess what?
THAT DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACT THAT THE COMPANY IS A DOG SHIT COMPANY, LOSING MONEY, READY FOR BANKRUPTCY ... AND YOU HAVE REFUSED TO ADDRESS THAT.
You refuse to comment on the crazy amount of FTDs on MEME as well.
MEME has fewer assets than the trailer park that queball lives in.
Question: Other than MEME, XRT, and any other funds that own GME, what OTHER funds ALSO have these FTD's?
If there are none, then you might have something. But since Goldman Sachs makes MOST (maybe all) of its profits from lending out "hard to borrow" securities, you can be sure that GME, XRT, and MEME are not the ONLY stocks and funds that have massive amounts of fake shares.
What do the FTD's show about all the stocks and funds out there? It is is ONLY GME-related, you might have something.
I guarantee you did not look at the link I sent you with all manner of Due Diligence on GME.
You're damn right, because you did not tell me what was in there. Remember, I don't give a FUCK about GME, one way or the other. I noticed the Jim Cramer thread, and responded. My FIRST post was about what a doofus Cramer is, but other than that I thought everything else in the OP was bullshit.
That's when the knives were thrown at me.
I have ZERO interest in any in-depth DD of GME. It's an intersting story ... MILDLY ... but if you are not going to explain what the hell I am supposed to be looking at, I am not going to spend the time to dig through it.
I spent time reading the SEC paper. I read the first half.
Did YOU read it? I bet if you did, you are the ONLY one in this thread who did.
Wild goose chases are not my thing. If you can point to something SPECIFIC (which I asked you to do about the SEC paper, and you did not do), then I might take a look. Otherwise, nah.
I know I will not change your mind. The point of this was to show everyone else how much you and others like you do not know nor understand about this play.
Again, I don't give a FUCK about GME. Therefore, OF COURSE it is true that I would not know everything that all of you, who have been following it for more than a year, would know.
BUT ...
I quickly found out (within less than a minute) that the company LOSES MONEY. And that they have a BURN RATE LEADING TO BANKRUPTCY.
IF all these naked shorts exist, all they have to do is hold out until the company is out of money and cannot find a big whale to prop them up. At that point, ALL the shares become worthless, and the shorts simply close out their positions and have a nice vacation on the yacht.
The longs, OTOH, have a VERY tough road to go. The ONLY hope it seems is the mythical BIG SHORT SQUEEZE ... that was supposed to happen over a year ago. But the stock is DOWN 80% from then, in a market that is UP during that same time.
Why do you continue to IGNORE the fundamental of the BUSINESS that the stock represents? That tells me A LOT about you and the others here.
This is not a traditional investor play, this is the mother of all short squeezes due to the funds fucking up.
Well guess what? IF that happens ... I will probably make more money on it that you.
IF a massive short squeeze happens, I will SEE it on my chart, just like I did last year. I MIGHT wait for the inevitable pullback, and then take a ride along with you.
But in the meantime, I have my money elsewhere ... and NOT LOSING 80% SITTING ON A DOG SHIT COMPANY FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR.
If you want to address the horrible financials of the company, I would be interested in seeing what you have to say. Because THAT is the ultimate test. Can they turn it around? If so, how exactly?
If you cannot do that, then I have no further interest in speculating about "secret short sellers." They might exist. You might be right.
But it has not made you any money, has it?
Just waiting for it to make its move is a hell of a lot more profitable than sitting on the big crash.
It is already down 80%. There is no reason it can't go 100%.
Actually, I think you are the one (among others in this thread) who is being obtuse.
You have NOT addressed GME's financials. It loses money. It has a burn rate that will put it into bankruptcy without a bailout ... SOON.
What do you have to say about THAT?
Regarding GME/XRT --
I have NOT said that nobody at all is shorting XRT naked. Obviously, somebody is. But what evidence do you have that it is GME shorts doing it?
Just because XRT is being naked shorted, it does not mean the shorts are doing it because they want to be short GME. Maybe a chunk of it is those guys, but what evidence do you have it is them?
Seems like hopeful wishes. Somebody ran up GME a year ago, and came up with the naked short story. That was TRUE ... back then. But since those positions have been unwound, the story shifted to XRT being manipulated BECAUSE of GME.
Did you READ the SEC paper? It was talking about the 2012-2014 timeframe. The problem has been around A LONG time -- long before GME became a public stock.
When I was saying before that "they would not do it," I was not talking about the GME short sellers. I was also not talking about XRT short sellers.
Some of the people in this thread wrote in such a way that made it seem like it was the money managers of XRT (which is EXACTLY what I wrote) being involved in using XRT money to short GME within the XRT fund itself.
I said that THAT would not happen. Now, I realize you guys are not talking about that. You are talking about short sellers shorting shares of XRT. So, the XRT managers don't have anything to do with that (although, they should be aware of this, and blowing the whistle, but they don't seem to be).
I just came to this story yesterday. You guys are not exactly clearly laying out the case for your position. You are the only one who has actually explained anything. Everyone else in this thread is nothing more than a cheerleader.
Let's get some pom poms for queball. ;-)
Now that I understand you are talking about the manipulation of XRT shares, and not the XRT managment manipulating GME shares, your story makes more sense. Not that I agree with it, but at least it is not complete lunacy.
You refuse to comment on the very blatant 90 day cycle.
I wrote in one of these posts that the 90-day cycle is tied to the earnings cycle. A big run up, and then melt down. MOST stocks are tied to their earnings cycle. This is a good time for shorts to exit their positions, as the price and volume both go up. But it does not prove anything. You don't like may answer, but I DID address it.
You refuse to comment on the swaps that they are using that took out Archegos and put a huge loss on Credit Suisse.
I have not looked into it. So, I can't comment on it.
You refuse to comment on the CFTC making those swaps hidden to the public until 2023
That is corruption at its finest. There may be some fuckery going on. But guess what?
THAT DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACT THAT THE COMPANY IS A DOG SHIT COMPANY, LOSING MONEY, READY FOR BANKRUPTCY ... AND YOU HAVE REFUSED TO ADDRESS THAT.
You refuse to comment on the crazy amount of FTDs on MEME as well.
MEME has fewer assets than the trailer park that queball lives in.
Question: Other than MEME, XRT, and any other funds that own GME, what OTHER funds ALSO have these FTD's?
If there are none, then you might have something. But since Goldman Sachs makes MOST (maybe all) of its profits from lending out "hard to borrow" securities, you can be sure that GME, XRT, and MEME are not the ONLY stocks and funds that have massive amounts of fake shares.
What do the FTD's show about all the stocks and funds out there? It is is ONLY GME-related, you might have something.
I guarantee you did not look at the link I sent you with all manner of Due Diligence on GME.
You're damn right, because you did not tell me what was in there. Remember, I don't give a FUCK about GME, one way or the other. I noticed the Jim Cramer thread, and responded. My FIRST post was about what a doofus Cramer is, but other than that I thought everything else in the OP was bullshit.
That's when the knives were thrown at me.
I have ZERO interest in any in-depth DD of GME. It's an intersting story ... MILDLY ... but if you are not going to explain what the hell I am supposed to be looking at, I am not going to spend the time to dig through it.
I spent time reading the SEC paper. I read the first half.
Did YOU read it? I bet if you did, you are the ONLY one in this thread who did.
Wild goose chases are not my thing. If you can point to something SPECIFIC (which I asked you to do about the SEC paper, and you did not do), then I might take a look. Otherwise, nah.
I know I will not change your mind. The point of this was to show everyone else how much you and others like you do not know nor understand about this play.
Again, I don't give a FUCK about GME. Therefore, OF COURSE it is true that I would not know everything that all of you, who have been following it for more than a year, would know.
BUT ...
I quickly found out (within less than a minute) that the company LOSES MONEY. And that they have a BURN RATE LEADING TO BANKRUPTCY.
IF all these naked shorts exist, all they have to do is hold out until the company is out of money and cannot find a big whale to prop them up. At that point, ALL the shares become worthless, and the shorts simply close out their positions and have a nice vacation on the yacht.
The longs, OTOH, have a VERY tough road to go. The ONLY hope it seems is the mythical BIG SHORT SQUEEZE ... that was supposed to happen over a year ago. But the stock is DOWN 80% from then, in a market that is UP during that same time.
Why do you continue to IGNORE the fundamental of the BUSINESS that the stock represents? That tells me A LOT about you and the others here.
This is not a traditional investor play, this is the mother of all short squeezes due to the funds fucking up.
Well guess what? IF that happens ... I will probably make more money on it that you.
IF a massive short squeeze happens, I will SEE it on my chart, just like I did last year. I MIGHT wait for the inevitable pullback, and then take a ride along with you.
But in the meantime, I have my money elsewhere ... and NOT LOSING 80% SITTING ON A DOG SHIT COMPANY FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR.
If you want to address the horrible financials of the company, I would be interested in seeing what you have to say. Because THAT is the ultimate test. Can they turn it around? If so, how exactly?
If you cannot do that, then I have no further interest in speculating about "secret short sellers." They might exist. You might be right.
But it has not made you any money, has it?
Just waiting for it to make its move is a hell of a lot more profitable than sitting on the big crash.
It is already down 80%. There is no reason it can't go 100%.
Actually, I think you are the one (among others in this thread) who is being obtuse.
You have NOT addressed GME's financials. It loses money. It has a burn rate that will put it into bankruptcy without a bailout ... SOON.
What do you have to say about THAT?
Regarding GME/XRT --
I have NOT said that nobody at all is shorting XRT naked. Obviously, somebody is. But what evidence do you have that it is GME shorts doing it?
Just because XRT is being naked shorted, it does not mean the shorts are doing it because they want to be short GME. Maybe a chunk of it is those guys, but what evidence do you have it is them?
Seems like hopeful wishes. Somebody ran up GME a year ago, and came up with the nakes short story. That was TRUE ... back then. But since those positions have been unwound, the story shifted to XRT being manipulated BECAUSE of GME.
Did you READ the SEC paper? It was talking about the 2012-2014 timeframe. That problem has been around A LONG time -- long before GME became a public stock.
When I was saying before that "they would not do it," I was not talking about the GME short sellers. I was also not talking about XRT short sellers.
Some of the people in this thread wrote in such a way that made it seem like it was the money managers of XRT (which is EXACTLY what I wrote) being involved in using XRT money to short GME within the XRT fund itself.
I said that THAT would not happen. Now, I realize you guys are not talking about that. You are talking about short sellers shorting shares of XRT. So, the XRT managers don't have anything to do with that (although, they should be aware of this, and blowing the whistle, but they don't seem to be).
I just came to this story yesterday. You guys are not exactly clearly laying out the case for your position. You are the only one who has actually explained anything. Everyone else in this thread is nothing more than a cheerleader.
Let's get some pom poms for queball. ;-)
Now that I understand you are talking about the manipulation of XRT shares, and not the XRT managment manipulating GME shares, your story makes more sense. Not that I agree with it, but at least it is not complete lunacy.
You refuse to comment on the very blatant 90 day cycle.
I wrote in one of these posts that the 90-day cycle is tied to the earnings cycle. A big run up, and then melt down. MOST stocks are tied to their earnings cycle. This is a good time for shorts to exit their positions, as the price and volume both go up. But it does not prove anything. You don't like may answer, but I DID address it.
You refuse to comment on the swaps that they are using that took out Archegos and put a huge loss on Credit Suisse.
I have not looked into it. So, I can't comment on it.
You refuse to comment on the CFTC making those swaps hidden to the public until 2023
That is corruption at its finest. There may be some fuckery going on. But guess what?
THAT DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACT THAT THE COMPANY IS A DOG SHIT COMPANY, LOSING MONEY, READY FOR BANKRUPTCY ... AND YOU HAVE REFUSED TO ADDRESS THAT.
You refuse to comment on the crazy amount of FTDs on MEME as well.
MEME has fewer assets than the trailer park that queball lives in.
Question: Other than MEME, XRT, and any other funds that own GME, what OTHER funds ALSO have these FTD's?
If there are none, then you might have something. But since Goldman Sachs makes MOST (maybe all) of its profits from lending out "hard to borrow" securities, you can be sure that GME, XRT, and MEME are not the ONLY stocks and funds that have massive amounts of fake shares.
What do the FTD's show about all the stocks and funds out there? It is is ONLY GME-related, you might have something.
I guarantee you did not look at the link I sent you with all manner of Due Diligence on GME.
You're damn right, because you did not tell me what was in there. Remember, I don't give a FUCK about GME, one way or the other. I noticed the Jim Cramer thread, and responded. My FIRST post was about what a doofus Cramer is, but other than that I thought everything else in the OP was bullshit.
That's when the knives were thrown at me.
I have ZERO interest in any in-depth DD of GME. It's an intersting story ... MILDLY ... but if you are not going to explain what the hell I am supposed to be looking at, I am not going to spend the time to dig through it.
I spent time reading the SEC paper. I read the first half.
Did YOU read it? I bet if you did, you are the ONLY one in this thread who did.
Wild goose chases are not my thing. If you can point to something SPECIFIC (which I asked you to do about the SEC paper, and you did not do), then I might take a look. Otherwise, nah.
I know I will not change your mind. The point of this was to show everyone else how much you and others like you do not know nor understand about this play.
Again, I don't give a FUCK about GME. Therefore, OF COURSE it is true that I would not know everything that all of you, who have been following it for more than a year, would know.
BUT ...
I quickly found out (within less than a minute) that the company LOSES MONEY. And that they have a BURN RATE LEADING TO BANKRUPTCY.
IF all these naked shorts exist, all they have to do is hold out until the company is out of money and cannot find a big whale to prop them up. At that point, ALL the shares become worthless, and the shorts simply close out their positions and have a nice vacation on the yacht.
The longs, OTOH, have a VERY tough road to go. The ONLY hope it seems is the mythical BIG SHORT SQUEEZE ... that was supposed to happen over a year ago. But the stock is DOWN 80% from then, in a market that is UP during that same time.
Why do you continue to IGNORE the fundamental of the BUSINESS that the stock represents? That tells me A LOT about you and the others here.
This is not a traditional investor play, this is the mother of all short squeezes due to the funds fucking up.
Well guess what? IF that happens ... I will probably make more money on it that you.
IF a massive short squeeze happens, I will SEE it on my chart, just like I did last year. I MIGHT wait for the inevitable pullback, and then take a ride along with you.
But in the meantime, I have my money elsewhere ... and NOT LOSING 80% SITTING ON A DOG SHIT COMPANY FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR.
If you want to address the horrible financials of the company, I would be interested in seeing what you have to say. Because THAT is the ultimate test. Can they turn it around? If so, how exactly?
If you cannot do that, then I have no further interest in speculating about "secret short sellers." They might exist. You might be right.
But it has not made you any money, has it?
Just waiting for it to make its move is a hell of a lot more profitable than sitting on the big crash.
It is already down 80%. There is no reason it can't go 100%.