Are you calling me Satan for point out a fact? How dare you! Where do you get off? This is outrageous.
For everyone else, I'm not offering an opinion. I'm telling you a fact. This does not apply to the 2020 election.
That case was trying to have 2020 mail in ballots thrown out. This was back in Nov 2020 The PA Supreme unamiously denied with prejudice their case
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has dismissed the lawsuit from Congressman Mike Kelly and congressional candidate Sean Parnell to declare universal mail-in voting unconstitutional in the state and deny the votes of the majority of Pennsylvanians who voted by mail in the Nov. 3 election.
One of the reasons it was thrown out was, they didn't object to the law when it was passed, the only objected once the counting was done. This would have disenfranchised 2.5 million votes.
This new lawsuit IS NOT ABOUT 2020. It was about future elections. It was filed back in july. Read the judge's ruling for yourself.
McLinko filed his petition in July of 2021, between elections, and sought expedited relief “in sufficient advance” of the November 2021 General Election so that electors would not have their votes disqualified. Application for Expedited Briefing and Summary Relief, ¶6.33 There is no risk of disenfranchisement of one vote, let alone millions, as was the case in Kelly. The critical difference between Kelly and this case is that McLinko is seeking prospective relief, i.e., a determination as to the constitutionality of Act 77 for future elections.
Are you calling me Satan for point out a fact? How dare you! Where do you get off? This is outrageous.
For everyone else, I'm not offering an opinion. I'm telling you a fact. This does not apply to the 2020 election.
That case was trying to have 2020 mail in ballots thrown out. This was back in Nov 2020 The PA Supreme unamiously denied with prejudice their case
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has dismissed the lawsuit from Congressman Mike Kelly and congressional candidate Sean Parnell to declare universal mail-in voting unconstitutional in the state and deny the votes of the majority of Pennsylvanians who voted by mail in the Nov. 3 election.
One of the reasons it was thrown out was, they didn't object to the law when it was passed, the only objected once the counting was done. This would have disenfranchised 2.5 million votes.
This new lawsuit IS NOT ABOUT 2020. It was about future elections. It was filed back in july. Read the judge's ruling for yourself.
McLinko filed his petition in July of 2021, between elections, and sought expedited relief **“in sufficient advance” **of the November 2021 General Election so that electors would not have their votes disqualified. Application for Expedited Briefing and Summary Relief, ¶6.33 There is no risk of disenfranchisement of one vote, let alone millions, as was the case in Kelly. The critical difference between Kelly and this case is that McLinko is seeking prospective relief, i.e., a determination as to the constitutionality of Act 77 for future elections.