This is exceptionally awesome EXCEPT ... the math on slide 22 is wrong. They should have subtracted 1 from the equation they used in the calculation of PERCENTAGE CHANGE from Current to Past (Average).

Should look like (( Current / Historical) - 1)*100. Ex: If something WAS 50, and is now 100, the PERCENTAGE CHANGE would be ((100 / 50) - 1 )*100 or 100%. That makes sense, because if a value doubles, then it of course went up 100%. They did not do this in their calcs.

I only point that out because the assholes that will attempt to discredit the results can cry "Bad math ... you don't know what you're doing" ... and they will.

This is exceptionally awesome EXCEPT ... the math on slide 22 is wrong. They should have subtracted 1 from the equation they used in the calculation of PERCENTAGE CHANGE from Current to Past (Average).

Should look like (1 - ( Current / Historical))*100. Ex: If something WAS 50, and is now 100, the PERCENTAGE CHANGE would be (1 - (100 / 50))*100 or 100%. That makes sense, because if a value doubles, then it of course went up 100%. They did not do this in their calcs.

I only point that out because the assholes that will attempt to discredit the results can cry "Bad math ... you don't know what you're doing" ... and they will.