Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Yes, moonlight is cold, which proves that it is not reflected sunlight, but a light of its own. Genesis 1:16. Cold light will not make sense to you unless you consider the plasmatic nature of the universe. Even NASA admits the universe is 99+℅ plasma, you can easily find this figure in NASA docs, even while they talk from the other side of their mouth about the "vacuum" of space. A "vacuum" filled with plasma is no vacuum. Furthermore, the odds that the sun (supposedly at approx. 93,000,000 miles away) and the moon (at approx. 238,000 miles) would have to be the exact size in proportion to their respective distances to be able to form a perfect eclipse when aligned, which is so improbable mathematically to be considered impossible.

Few set out to become "flat earthers", just as the majority here did not set out to discover the world operates through monstrous deeds to innocents by literal satantic minions, they come to conclusions based on studying the available evidence. I could not say with certainty what the shape of the earth is, but I know NASA lies about pretty much everything and their photographic evidence is admittedly cgi. I would recommend looking into the electric universe theory which, more specifically, is a plasmatic universe theory. The sun as a transformer, which transforms cosmic rays into UV to power our earth, is much more realistic than giant 4,385,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 pound furnance 93,000,0000 miles away, and the moon as a plasmatic entity to rule the tides is more realistic that a giant rock that only shows its one face (don't bother explaining the "official" reason, I don't buy it) and emits its own cool light, obviously not reflected from the sun. I believe both in God's word: two lights, one to mark the day and one to mark the night, as well as actual science, which we are not getting from NASA.

Very curious that most here understand the government is lying to you in very fundamental ways, but somehow NASA is pure and truthful? Why would the government lie about global child trafficking, satanic ritual abuse, torture, murder, and the occult basis for this evil? Sounds crazier than thinking the earth and cosmos are not what they are purported to be, but most here have seen enough evidence to know the former is true but the latter is a psyop to make those researching alternative topics look like fools?

It also seems very shady that this would be posted here. There is no other reason to bring this up except to cause division and encourage users to ridicule and demean each other. Very disappointing that some are ridiculing others (who more than likely have done much more alternative research on the subject) just as you have been ridiculed about Q-related subjects yourselves.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yes, moonlight is cold, which proves that it is not reflected sunlight, but a light of its own. Genesis 1:16. Cold light will not make sense to you unless you consider the plasmatic nature of the universe. Even NASA admits the universe is 99+℅ plasma, you can easily find this figure in NASA docs, even while they talk from the other side of their mouth about the "vacuum" of space. A "vacuum" filled with plasma is no vacuum. Furthermore, the odds that the sun (supposedly at approx. 93,000,000 miles away) and the moon (at approx. 238,000 miles) would have to be the exact size in proportion to their respective distances to be able to form a perfect eclipse when aligned, which is so improbable mathematically to be considered impossible.

Few set out to become "flat earthers", just as the majority here did not set out to discover the world operates through monstrous deeds to innocents by literal satantic minions, they come to conclusions based on studying the available evidence. I could not say with certainty what the shape of the earth is, but I know NASA lies about pretty much everything and their photographic evidence is admittedly cgi. I would recommend looking into the electric universe theory which, more specifically, is a plasmatic universe theory. The sun as a transformer, which transforms cosmic rays into UV to power our earth, is much more realistic than giant 4,385,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 pound furnance 93,000,0000 miles away, and the moon as a plasmatic entity to rule the tides is more realistic that a giant rock that only shows its one face (don't bother explaining the "official" reason, I don't buy it) and emits its own cool light, obviously not reflected from the sun. I believe both in God's word: two lights, one to mark the day and one to mark the night, as well as actual science, which we are not getting from NASA.

Very curious that most here understand the government is lying to you in very fundamental ways, but somehow NASA is pure and truthful? Why would the government lie about global child trafficking, satanic ritual abuse, torture, murder, and the occult basis for this evil? Sounds crazier than thinking the earth and cosmos are not what they are purported to be, but most here have seen enough evidence to know the former is true but the latter is a psyop to make those researching alternative topics look like fools.

It also seems very shady that this would be posted here. There is no other reason to bring this up except to cause division and encourage users to ridicule and demean each other. Very disappointing that some are ridiculing others (who more than likely have done much more alternative research on the subject) just as you have been ridiculed about Q-related subjects yourselves.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yes, moonlight is cold, which proves that it is not reflected sunlight, but a light of its own. Genesis 1:16. Cold light will not make sense to you unless you consider the plasmatic nature of the universe. Even NASA admits the universe is 99+℅ plasma, you can easily find this figure in NASA docs, even while they talk from the other side of their mouth about the "vacuum" of space. A "vacuum" filled with plasma is no vacuum. Furthermore, the odds that the sun (supposedly at approx. 93,000,000 miles away) and the moon (at approx. 238,000 miles) would have to be the exact size in proportion to their respective distances to be able to form a perfect eclipse when aligned, which is so improbable mathematically to be considered impossible.

Few set out to become "flat earthers", just as the majority here did not set out to discover the world operates through monstrous deeds to innocents by literal satantic minions, they come to conclusions based on studying the available evidence. I could not say with certainty what the shape of the earth is, but I know NASA lies about pretty much everything and their photographic evidence is admittedly cgi. I would recommend looking into the electric universe theory which, more specifically, is a plasmatic universe theory. The sun as a transformer, which transforms cosmic rays into UV to power our earth, is much more realistic than giant 4,385,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 pound furnance 93,000,0000 miles away, and the moon as a plasmatic entity to rule the tides is more realistic that a giant rock that only shows its one face (don't bother explaining the "official" reason, I don't buy it) and emits its own cool light, obviously not reflected from the sun. I believe both in God's word: two lights, one to mark the day and one to mark the night, as well as actual science, which we are not getting from NASA.

Very curious that most here understand the government is lying to you in very fundamental ways, but somehow NASA is pure and truthful? Why would the government lie about global child trafficking, satanic ritual abuse, torture, murder, and the occult basis for this evil? Sounds crazier than thinking the earth and cosmos are not what they are purported to be, but most here have seen enough evidence to know the former is true but the latter is a psyop to make those researching alternative topics look like fools.

It also seems very shady that this would be posted here. There is no other reason to bring this up expect to cause division and encourage users to ridicule and demean each other. Very disappointing.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yes, moonlight is cold, which proves that it is not reflected sunlight, but a light of its own. Genesis 1:16. Cold light will not make sense to you unless you condider the plasmatic nature of the universe. Even NASA admits the universe is 99+℅ plasma, you can easily find this figure in NASA docs, even while they talk from the other side of their mouth about the "vacuum" of space. A "vacuum" filled with plasma is no vacuum. Furthermore, the odds that the sun (supposedly at approx. 93,000,000 miles away) and the moon (at approx. 238,000 miles) would have to be the exact size in proportion to their respective distances to be able to form a perfect eclipse when aligned, which is so improbable mathematically to be considered impossible.

Few set out to become "flat earthers", just as the majority here did not set out to discover the world operates through monstrous deeds to innocents by literal satantic minions, they come to conclusions based on studying the available evidence. I could not say with certainty what the shape of the earth is, but I know NASA lies about pretty much everything and their photographic evidence is admittedly cgi. I would recommend looking into the electric universe theory which, more specifically, is a plasmatic universe theory. The sun as a transformer, which transforms cosmic rays into UV to power our earth, is much more realistic than giant 4,385,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 pound furnance 93,000,0000 miles away, and the moon as a plasmatic entity to rule the tides is more realistic that a giant rock that only shows its one face (don't bother explaining the "official" reason, I don't buy it) and emits its own cool light, obviously not reflected from the sun. I believe both in God's word: two lights, one to mark the day and one to mark the night, as well as actual science, which we are not getting from NASA.

Very curious that most here understand the government is lying to you in very fundamental ways, but somehow NASA is pure and truthful? Why would the government lie about global child trafficking, satanic ritual abuse, torture, murder, and the occult basis for this evil? Sounds crazier than thinking the earth and cosmos are not what they are purported to be, but most here have seen enough evidence to know the former is true but the latter is a psyop to make those researching alternative topics look like fools.

It also seems very shady that this would be posted here. There is no other reason to bring this up expect to cause division and encourage users to ridicule and demean each other. Very disappointing.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yes, moonlight is cold, which proves that it is not reflected sunlight, but a light of its own. Genesis 1:16. Cold light will not make sense to you unless you condider the plasmatic nature of the universe. Even NASA admits the universe is 99+℅ plasma, you can easily find this figure in NASA docs, even while they talk from the other side of their mouth about the "vacuum" of space. A "vacuum" filled with plasma is no vacuum. Furthermore, the odds that the sun (supposedly at approx. 93,000,000 miles away) and the moon (at approx. 238,000 miles) would have to be the exact size in proportion to their respective distances to be able to form a perfect eclipse when aligned, which is so improbable mathematically to be considered impossible.

Few set out to become "flat earthers", most come to various conclusions based on study. I would never with any certainty what the shape of the earth, but I know NASA lies about pretty much everything. I would recommend looking into the electric universe theory, which more specifically, is a plasmatic universe theory. The sun as a transformer, which transforms cosmic rays into UV to power our earth, is much more realistic than giant 4,385,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 pound furnance 93,000,0000 miles away, and the moon as a plasmatic entity is more realistic that a giant rock that only shows its one face (don't bother explaining the " official" reason, I don't buy it) and emits its own cool light, obviously not reflected from the sun. I believe both in God's word: two lights, one to mark the day and one to mark the night, as well as actual science, which we are not getting from NASA.

Very curious that most here understand the government is lying to you in very fundamental ways, but somehow NASA is pure and truthful? Why would the government lie about global child trafficking, satanic ritual abuse, torture, murder, and the occult basis for this evil? Sounds crazier than thinking the earth and cosmos are not what they are purported to be, but most here have seen enough evidence to know the former is true.

It also seems very shady that this would be posted here. There is no other reason to bring this up expect to cause division and encourage users to ridicule and demean each other. Very disappointing.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Yes, moonlight is cold, which proves that it is not reflected sunlight, but a light of its own. Genesis 1:16. Cold light will not make sense to you unless you condider the plasmatic nature of the universe. Even NASA admits the universe is 99+℅ plasma, you can easily find this figure in NASA docs, even while they talk from the other side of their mouth about the "vacuum" of space. A "vacuum" filled with plasma is no vacuum. Furthermore, the odds that the sun (supposedly at approx. 93,000,000 miles away) and the moon (at approx. 238,000 miles) would have to be the exact size in portpotion to their respective distances to be able to form a perfect eclipse when aligned, which is so improbable mathematically to be considered impossible.

Few set out to become "flat earthers", most come to various conclusions based on study. I would never with any certainty what the shape of the earth, but I know NASA lies about pretty much everything. I would recommend looking into the electric universe theory, which more specifically, is a plasmatic universe theory. The sun as a transformer, which transforms cosmic rays into UV to power our earth, is much more realistic than giant 4,385,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 pound furnance 93,000,0000 miles away, and the moon as a plasmatic entity is more realistic that a giant stone that only shows its one face and emits its own cool light, obviously not reflected from the sun. I believe both in God's word: two lights, one to mark the day and one to mark the night, as well as actual science, which we are not getting from NASA.

Very curious that most here understand the government is lying to you in very fundamental ways, but somehow NASA is pure and truthful? Why would the government lie about global child trafficking, satanic ritual abuse, torture, murder, and the occult basis for this evil? Sounds crazier than thinking the earth and cosmos are not what they are purported to be, but most here have seen enough evidence to know the former is true.

It also seems very shady that this would be posted here. There is no other reason to bring this up expect to cause division and encourage users to ridicule and demean each other. Very disappointing.

2 years ago
1 score