I had a quick look at your link and it doesn't address my argument: that Taoism is fundamentally flawed because almost all of it's concepts are subjective.

Christianity mitigates these problems by focusing on the life, acts and teachings of Jesus Christ so the interpretation of teachings are powerfully constrained by the behavior of Jesus Christ. There's still plenty of ways to interpret the New Testament, however interpretations are constrained by how Jesus Christ lived and acted, rather than only by what he said.

Taoism does have little stories to illustrate points, however those stories almost always fail to constrain points and serve mostly as metaphors.

I had a quick look at your link and it doesn't address my argument: that Taoism is fundamentally flawed because almost all of it's concepts are subjective.

Christianity mitigates these problems by focusing on the life, acts and teachings of Jesus Christ so the interpretation of teachings are powerfully constrained by the behavior of Jesus Christ. There's still plenty of ways to interpret the New Testament, however interpretations are constrained by how Jesus Christ lived and acted, rather than only by what he said.

Taoism does have little stories illustrate points, however those stories almost always fail to constrain points and serve mostly as metaphors.

I had a quick look at your link and it doesn't address my argument: that Taoism is fundamentally flawed because all of it's concepts are subjective.

Christianity mitigates these problems by focusing on the life, acts and teachings of Jesus Christ so the interpretation of teachings are powerfully constrained by the behavior of Jesus Christ. There's still plenty of ways to interpret the New Testament, however interpretations are constrained by how Jesus Christ lived and acted, rather than only by what he said.

Taoism does have little stories illustrate points, however those stories almost always fail to constrain points and serve mostly as metaphors.