What's precious is that the next post below yours just happens to say: "The virus doesn’t exist." and links to a book about how it doesn't exist.
You're an expert. I'm not. I've read stuff. I've read many doctors stating how virology in general is a flawed science based on flawed principles and early experiments that didn't follow the scientific method... that the testing procedures themselves create the observed effect of the "mythical" virus. I don't know. I'm no scientician but it seems plausible to me that the whole thing is based on flawed principles.
Can you answer, are there real photos of real viruses? Some claim they don't exist. [edit] I read that book linked by Cowan. It makes a pretty damning argument against what you stated in your post. The last 1/3 of it gets a bit woowoo though. Can you rebut the arguments he makes in this book?

What's precious is that the next post below yours just happens to say: "The virus doesn’t exist." and links to a book about how it doesn't exist.
You're an expert. I'm not. I've read stuff. I've read many doctors stating how virology in general is a flawed science based on flawed principles and early experiments that didn't follow the scientific method... that the testing procedures themselves create the observed effect of the "mythical" virus. I don't know. I'm no scientician but it seems plausible to me that the whole thing is based on flawed principles.
Can you answer, are there real photos of real viruses? Some claim they don't exist.