Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I just read an article by Paul Sperry at RealClearInvestigations, through GWP, that is more inline with your proof than the alternate theory.

There is still some confusion as to the timing of the turn over of the 170M IPs. Before reading any of the recent articles or your proof, I was under the assumption that they were given to Packet Forensics when Trump was still President. This would align with the theory that Packet Forensics was working with WHs. Now Im seeing that it was done under Biden. The timing aspect could be deliberate disinformation by our enemies.

Read the article from Paul Sperry here:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/checkered-past-fbi-cyber-contractor-spied-trump/

One thing is clear, Rodney Joffe is a two bit conman with no expertise in Cyber Security.

Another GWP article here that is a good summation of events:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/excellent-summary-durham-investigation-date-will-durham-destroy-national-security-state-just-hillary-clinton/

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I just read an article by Paul Sperry at RealClearInvestigations, through GWP, that is more inline with your proof than the alternate theory.

There is still some confusion as to the timing of the turn over of the 170M IPs. Before reading any of the recent articles or your proof, I was under the assumption that they were given to Packet Forensics when Trump was still President. This would align with the theory that Packet Forensics was working with WHs. Now Im seeing that it was done under Biden.

Read the article from Paul Sperry here:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/checkered-past-fbi-cyber-contractor-spied-trump/

One thing is clear, Rodney Joffe is a two bit conman with no expertise in Cyber Security.

Another GWP article here that is a good summation of events:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/excellent-summary-durham-investigation-date-will-durham-destroy-national-security-state-just-hillary-clinton/

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I just read an article by Paul Sperry at RealClearInvestigations, through GWP, that is more inline with your proof than the alternate theory.

There is still some confusion as to the timing of the turn over of the 170M IPs. Before reading any of the recent articles, I was under the assumption that they were given to Packet Forensics when Trump was still President. This would align with the theory that Packet Forensics was working with WHs. Now Im seeing that it was done under Biden.

Read the article from Paul Sperry here:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/checkered-past-fbi-cyber-contractor-spied-trump/

One thing is clear, Rodney Joffe is a two bit conman with no expertise in Cyber Security.

Another GWP article here that is a good summation of events:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/excellent-summary-durham-investigation-date-will-durham-destroy-national-security-state-just-hillary-clinton/

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I just read an article by Paul Sperry at RealClearInvestigations, through GWP, that is more inline with your proof than the alternate theory.

There is still some confusion as to the timing of the turn over of the 170M IPs. Before reading any of the recent articles, I was under the assumption that they were given to Packet Forensics when Trump was still President. This would align with the theory that Packet Forensics was working with WHs. Now Im seeing that it was done under Biden.

Read the article from Paul Sperry here:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/checkered-past-fbi-cyber-contractor-spied-trump/

One thing is clear, Rodney Joffe is a two bit conman with no expertise in Cyber Security.

2 years ago
1 score