Notice the phrasing. If this were any other subject in which users were duped into downloading a fake app, the writer wouldn’t have used negative words connoting blame and ascribing it to the user. Any blame would have centered entirely around the app publisher.
The writer also would not have used a knowingly divisive (and from the left’s perspective, derisive) label like “MAGA types” in close proximity to the connotations of blame.
Here we have: “MAGA types” (divisive label) who failed (blame) to realize the distinction.
TRUTH is an inclusive (in the actual sense, not the libtard sense) free speech platform spearheaded by Trump, that’s seeking to eventually overthrow its competitors.
The very notion that it is only for “MAGA types” is slander to them.
If this were, say, a marketplace app for disenfranchised minorities, I promise you this statement would be written more like:
“An apparently fraudulent version of {x} app, racking up {y} downloads in its attempt to intentionally confuse minorities looking to support their community”
That revised tone shifts the onus from the user to the app publisher, uses neutral or protective terminology to label the users, and conveys a tone of the writer trying to right an injustice rather than laughing at the situation from afar.
If you’re saying this is not one of those Buzzfeed “ha ha look at the uneducated anti vaccers” articles, then sure, but that’s not how most media portrayals work. Some are subtler than this, some are more brazen, but I promise you that you are unlikely to find even the subtle language ever skew in favor of the Trumpers.
Notice the phrasing. If this were any other subject in which users were duped into downloading a fake app, the writer wouldn’t have used negative words connoting blame and ascribing it to the user. Any blame would have centered entirely around the app publisher.
The writer also would not have used a knowingly divisive (and from the left’s perspective, derisive) label like “MAGA types” in close proximity to the connotations of blame.
Here we have: “MAGA types” (divisive label) who failed (blame) to realize the distinction.
TRUTH is an inclusive (in the actual sense, not the libtard sense) free speech platform spearheaded by Trump, that’s seeking to eventually overthrow its competitors.
The very notion that it is only for “MAGA types” is slander.
If this were, say, a marketplace app for disenfranchised minorities, I promise you this statement would be written more like:
“An apparently fraudulent version of {x} app, racking up {y} downloads in its attempt to intentionally confuse minorities looking to support their community”
That revised tone shifts the onus from the user to the app publisher, uses neutral or protective terminology to label the users, and conveys a tone of the writer trying to right an injustice rather than laughing at the situation from afar.
If you’re saying this is not one of those Buzzfeed “ha ha look at the uneducated anti vaccers” articles, then sure, but that’s not how most media portrayals work. Some are subtler than this, some are more brazen, but I promise you that you are unlikely to find even the subtle language ever skew in favor of the Trumpers.