Correct.
If you are versed enough Q def mentioned Storch.
https://operationq.pub/?q=Storch
Q repeatedly said the Durham investigation involved Storch.
Storch very pointedly had a HUGE role in Ukraine.
Now where is Storch?
However, the Inspector General’s report says, “USP queries performed against FISA Section 702 data did not always follow NSA procedural and policy requirements.” Although the report does not say how many times FISA laws were violated and does not give any specific examples of the violations, it says that agency queries were performed on acquired “content and metadata” with “USP selectors” that “did not always follow” their own internal policies and procedures.
He’s getting confirmed to be OIG for the Department of Defense and throwing mad shade at FISA section 702 https://archive.ph/6fzHJ
He’s doing this NOW. Chance?
I will be honest. I’ve gone back off the wall and back on whether Storch is good or bad.
Then I get back to basics.
How could Storch be bad if Durham is still rolling?
Half of the power, also, is that Durham continues and folks are intentionally minimizing his validity
Then I remember the context of what Storch has been doing. He’s the first NSA Inspector General. That means he has all access to NSA everything’s as OIG to conduct oversight. Now - NSA has its own office for internal oversight. They were the folks that went after Snowden. They are known as the Q Group. Q, within posts, also routinely admitted to being NSA.
So deductive logic - Storch could have outed / ended Q posting the entire time. Storch has to be whitehat.
By the way the Q Group official name is the Associate Directorate for S3curity and C0unterintelligence
Correct.
If you are versed enough Q def mentioned Storch.
https://operationq.pub/?q=Storch
Q repeatedly said the Durham investigation involved Storch.
Storch very pointedly had a HUGE role in Ukraine.
Now where is Storch?
However, the Inspector General’s report says, “USP queries performed against FISA Section 702 data did not always follow NSA procedural and policy requirements.” Although the report does not say how many times FISA laws were violated and does not give any specific examples of the violations, it says that agency queries were performed on acquired “content and metadata” with “USP selectors” that “did not always follow” their own internal policies and procedures.
He’s getting confirmed to be OIG for the Department of Defense and throwing mad shade at FISA section 702 https://archive.ph/6fzHJ
He’s doing this NOW. Chance?