TLDR: Asian societies are more uniform in thinking like a cult. The thought process that influences Han-Chinese shaped throughout their history makes them untrustworthy to run white-hat operations and the GA in general.

Original Text:

Of course there are good Han Chinese, some are even valiantly fighting against their totalitarian rule and are being quietly quashed. A less-quiet example of this would be Xu Xiadong who challenged the ethnic Nationalism propaganda of the CCP by exposing Kung-fu 'fighting' for the fraud it is. (Just to be clear I'm not one of the 'nationalism-bad' sort of people but there are various types of nationalism which I hope to delve deeper in to later)

But these are individuals and when we're looking to see if a certain group is viable for white-hat operations we need more than individuals. A white-hat operation would need leadership with signicant (not necessarily in numbers) influence within said society.

To understand why Han Chinese are unsuitable to produce such leadership requires an understanding of Asian society/mindset and how this results in different methods of achieving totalitarian rule + the history of Han Chinese.

Asians in general are more prone to group-think based on ethnicity and prefer to stick with their own ethnicity while distancing from people outside of their ethnicity. This is why propaganda based on ethnic nationalism is always the alpha and omega of tyranical regimes in Asia.

Conversly, people of western origins are more individual minded and open to mingling. Which means ethnic based propaganda loses its apeal forcing group-think to lean towards idealogy, religion, Nation-states, cult/sects, secret societies, basicaly anything that requires participation implying a stronger sense of 'self' compared to ethnicity which one is simply born into.

How is this relevant? Going back to Asians, ethnicity is something one can't leave unlike religion or even a nation. Thus the iron grip group-think holds over Asians is something that exceeds the comprehension of those who are only accustomed to western societies. Just to be clear though, this isn't necessarily a negative attribute. The same attribute have also contributed to the survival and flourishing of Asian cultures at times. BUT, this also means that it is near impossible for Asian societies to break from the mold they are made from.

So then, what is the mold Han-Chinese are made of? The answer lies in the consisten pattern of their history and the characteristics they show at the present.

Up until quite recent history, the story of Han-Chinese, not mainland China, has been an endless cycle of Han-Chinese forced to flee from stronger Nomadic Dynasties then the Han slowly infiltrating the political ranks of the Nomadic Dynasty to destabalize and eventually assimilate the weakened dynasty. This is why the history the Han-Chinese claim as thiers is basically part Han Dynasties and part Nomadic Dynasties (Mongols being an example).

The constant fleeing and reliance on political subterfuge lead to the psyche of Han-Chinese shaping towards certains directions.

One of them is putting zero value on long-term social stability. How could they when they were always the ones breaking down the social structures created by others? A tradition they practice even up to this day against their neighbors. A characteristic that is incompatible with the great awakening that aims to fix/reform social structure.

Another direction their history of fleeing lead to was the laser-focus on the here and now. Basically, Han-Chinese do not believe in any form of after-life. Thus any form of short-term gain that can be acheived should be taken and remorse is a thing that simply doesn't exist. My understanding of the great awakening also includes a spiritual awakening which makes Han-Chinese incompatible with the GA.

While there's more to go over my post is already too long as it is and I'm also out of time.

So I'll conlcude with this:

The composition/structure of the society that is the ethnicity of Han Chinese versus that of the Khazarians, Pharisians, etc (the cult that have been blanketed under the term 'Jews' by the Cabal) may be completely different.

But the general Psychology of Asians that strongly shapes both the individuals and more importantly the leadership of Asian societies creates a strong universal characteristic that is similar to that found within a sect/cult. And the characteristic that shapes the Han-Chinese makes them as trustworthy to execute white-hat operations as the Khazarians.

TLDR: Asian societies are more uniform in thinking like a cult. The thought process that influences Han-Chinese shaped throughout their history makes them untrustworthy to run white-hat operations and the GA in general.

Original Text:

Of course there are good Han Chinese, some are even valiantly fighting against their totalitarian rule and are being quietly quashed. A less-quiet example of this would be Xu Xiadong who challenged the ethnic Nationalism propaganda of the CCP by exposing Kung-fu 'fighting' for the fraud it is. (Just to be clear I'm not one of the 'nationalism-bad' sort of people but there are various types of nationalism which I hope to delve deeper in to later)

But these are individuals and when we're looking to see if a certain group is viable for white-hat operations we need more than individuals. A white-hat operation would need leadership with signicant (not necessarily in numbers) influence within said society.

To understand why Han Chinese are unsuitable to produce such leadership requires an understanding of Asian society/mindset and how this results in different methods of achieving totalitarian rule + the history of Han Chinese.

Asians in general are more prone to group-think based on ethnicity and prefer to stick with their own ethnicity while distancing from people outside of their ethnicity. This is why propaganda based on ethnic nationalism is always the alpha and omega of tyranical regimes in Asia.

Conversly, people of western origins are more individual minded and open to mingling. Which means ethnic based propaganda loses its apeal forcing group-think to lean towards idealogy, religion, Nation-states, cult/sects, secret societies, basicaly anything that requires participation implying a stronger sense of 'self' compared to ethnicity which one is simply born into.

How is this relevant? Going back to Asians, ethnicity is something one can't leave unlike religion or even a nation. Thus the iron grip group-think holds over Asians is something that exceeds the comprehension of those who are only accustomed to western societies. Just to be clear though, this isn't necessarily a negative attribute. The same attribute have also contributed to the survival and flourishing of Asian cultures at times. BUT, this also means that it is near impossible for Asian societies to break from the mold they are made from.

So then, what is the mold Han-Chinese are made of? The answer lies in the consisten pattern of their history and the characteristics they show at the present.

Up until quite recent history, the story of Han-Chinese, not mainland China, has been an endless cycle of Han-Chinese forced to flee from stronger Nomadic Dynasties then the Han slowly infiltrating the political ranks of the Nomadic Dynasty to destabalize and eventually assimilate the weakened dynasty. This is why the history the Han-Chinese claim as thiers is basically part Han Dynasties and part Nomadic Dynasties (Mongols being an example).

The constant fleeing and reliance on political subterfuge lead to the psyche of Han-Chinese shaping towards certains directions.

One of them is putting zero value on long-term social stability. How could they when they were always the ones breaking down the social structures created by others? A tradition they practice even up to this day against their neighbors. A characteristic that is incompatible with the great awakening that aims to fix/reform social structure.

Another direction their history of fleeing lead to was the laser-focus on the here and now. Basically, Han-Chinese do not believe in any form of after-life. Thus any form of short-term gain that can be acheived should be taken and remorse is a thing that simply doesn't exist. My understanding of the great awakening also includes a spiritual awakening which makes Han-Chinese incompatible with the GA.

While there's more to go over my post is already too long as it is and I'm also out of time.

So I'll conlcude with this:

The composition/structure of the society that is the ethnicity of Han Chinese versus that of the Khazarians, Pharisians, etc (the cult that have been blanketed under the term 'Jews' by the Cabal) may be completely different.

But the general Psychology of Asians that strongly shapes both the individuals and more importantly the leadership of Asian societies creates a strong universal characteristic that is similar to that found within a sect/cult. And the characteristic that shapes the Han-Chinese makes that as trustworthy to execute white-hat operations as the Khazarians.

TLDR: Asian societies are more uniform in thinking like a cult. The thought process that influences Han-Chinese shaped throughout their history makes them untrustworthy to run white-hat operations and the GA in general.

Of course there are good Han Chinese, some are even valiantly fighting against their totalitarian rule and are being quietly quashed. A less-quiet example of this would be Xu Xiadong who challenged the ethnic Nationalism propaganda of the CCP by exposing Kung-fu 'fighting' for the fraud it is. (Just to be clear I'm not one of the 'nationalism-bad' sort of people but there are various types of nationalism which I hope to delve deeper in to later)

But these are individuals and when we're looking to see if a certain group is viable for white-hat operations we need more than individuals. A white-hat operation would need leadership with signicant (not necessarily in numbers) influence within said society.

To understand why Han Chinese are unsuitable to produce such leadership requires an understanding of Asian society/mindset and how this results in different methods of achieving totalitarian rule + the history of Han Chinese.

Asians in general are more prone to group-think based on ethnicity and prefer to stick with their own ethnicity while distancing from people outside of their ethnicity. This is why propaganda based on ethnic nationalism is always the alpha and omega of tyranical regimes in Asia.

Conversly, people of western origins are more individual minded and open to mingling. Which means ethnic based propaganda loses its apeal forcing group-think to lean towards idealogy, religion, Nation-states, cult/sects, secret societies, basicaly anything that requires participation implying a stronger sense of 'self' compared to ethnicity which one is simply born into.

How is this relevant? Going back to Asians, ethnicity is something one can't leave unlike religion or even a nation. Thus the iron grip group-think holds over Asians is something that exceeds the comprehension of those who are only accustomed to western societies. Just to be clear though, this isn't necessarily a negative attribute. The same attribute have also contributed to the survival and flourishing of Asian cultures at times. BUT, this also means that it is near impossible for Asian societies to break from the mold they are made from.

So then, what is the mold Han-Chinese are made of? The answer lies in the consisten pattern of their history and the characteristics they show at the present.

Up until quite recent history, the story of Han-Chinese, not mainland China, has been an endless cycle of Han-Chinese forced to flee from stronger Nomadic Dynasties then the Han slowly infiltrating the political ranks of the Nomadic Dynasty to destabalize and eventually assimilate the weakened dynasty. This is why the history the Han-Chinese claim as thiers is basically part Han Dynasties and part Nomadic Dynasties (Mongols being an example).

The constant fleeing and reliance on political subterfuge lead to the psyche of Han-Chinese shaping towards certains directions.

One of them is putting zero value on long-term social stability. How could they when they were always the ones breaking down the social structures created by others? A tradition they practice even up to this day against their neighbors. A characteristic that is incompatible with the great awakening that aims to fix/reform social structure.

Another direction their history of fleeing lead to was the laser-focus on the here and now. Basically, Han-Chinese do not believe in any form of after-life. Thus any form of short-term gain that can be acheived should be taken and remorse is a thing that simply doesn't exist. My understanding of the great awakening also includes a spiritual awakening which makes Han-Chinese incompatible with the GA.

While there's more to go over my post is already too long as it is and I'm also out of time.

So I'll conlcude with this:

The composition/structure of the society that is the ethnicity of Han Chinese versus that of the Khazarians, Pharisians, etc (the cult that have been blanketed under the term 'Jews' by the Cabal) may be completely different.

But the general Psychology of Asians that strongly shapes both the individuals and more importantly the leadership of Asian societies creates a strong universal characteristic that is similar to that found within a sect/cult. And the characteristic that shapes the Han-Chinese makes that as trustworthy to execute white-hat operations as the Khazarians.