Ukraine is the defender, not the aggressor.
Was Russia attacking the people of Donetsk and Luhansk the past 8 years? if not, who was waging civil war against the separatists?
Ukraine was defending the separatists, right?
Ukraine is the underdog faced with a full invasion by a superpower.
Why hasn't Russia taken out civilian power plants or the Internet if this is a full invasion?
Russia has purposefully hit civilian populace and locations.
Did any of those locations house purported bioweapons labs?
Are you basing this statement on actual evidence or just MSM articles?
There is no reasonably justifiable reason for Russia to invade Ukraine.
Have you considered the Russian claims about biolabs as possibly true? Have you wondered why the US would suddenly remove PDFs and redact information in response to those claims if they had no basis in truth?
Russia is seeking to overthrow the current government to install a puppet regime.
Russia has stated they are supporting the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in their claims for independence and enforcing the Minsk agreements by a show of force.
Ukraine was been at war with these regions for 8 years already.
Those are the facts.
On what basis do you make this claim Russia is trying to overthrow Ukraine and install a puppet regime?
Do you realize the United States did the very thing you're accusing Russia of? Do you know No Name played a big role in the overthrow? Do you even know who No Name is?
Do you realize Joe Biden pressured the US puppet Poroshenko into firing the prosecutor Shokin who was investigating Burisma, the Ukrainian energy company that paid Hunter Biden $50,000 a month, with 10% going to the "Big Guy"?
Do you realize Joe Biden publicly bragged about pressuring Shokin to be fired and the fact checkers claim everybody wanted Shokin fired so that means Joe Biden did nothing wrong?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXA--dj2-CY
Putin is complex and can't be pigeon holed as a "white hat". He has his own motivations that may or may not align with ours.
I wouldn't disagree Putin has his own reasons for fighting against George Soros and the New World Order. I also wouldn't question claims he's taken advantage of his position as Russian leader to enrich himself and his friends and associates.
With that being said, you've provided nothing of substance here to support your positions.
For someone who's presumably religious and an "against the grain", "critical thinker", you seem wholly intolerant to any ideas outside your own.
I've clearly explained my position and provided plenty of support in the form of primary sources.
How can I be intolerant to any ideas outside of my own if it took you this many replies to even share them in the first place?
You'd think a Q follower would be MORE open to a diversity of opinions, but clearly, this is not the case with you.
You'd think a shill/useful idiot who disagrees with Q Drops and supports George Soros would appeal to emotions and lecture others about confirmation bias, nuance, and engage in other forum sliding techniques. This is exactly the case with you.
You have more in common with a libtard: screaming down, name calling, emotional outbursts, one dimensional thinking, intolerance of differences.
As far as name calling, how many times have I called YOU a libtard? I inferred you were a smooth brain from your comments.
There was no screaming down or emotional outbursts from my end. Are you daft?
As far as one dimensional thinking, I've already shared my analysis of Putin. There's no question in my mind he's been feeding himself quite well at the public trough. I don't see him as a virtuous saint who can do nothing wrong.
And as far as intolerance of differences, I fully support your right to believe whatever you want.
For that reason I'm not going to waste my time engaging with you any further. You're not interested in a rational discussion. You're more interested in attacking "frens" on the same team for daring to have a thought that doesn't comport with yours. Pretty lame, really.
Is asking why you support Ukraine repeatedly really an attack? Did I accuse you of not understanding nuance or other Philosophy 101 topics?
Who's the fren blasting fellow frens for repeating "pro-Russia propaganda" and who's the fren siding with George Soros?
Ukraine is the defender, not the aggressor.
Was Russia attacking the people of Donetsk and Luhansk the past 8 years? if not, who was waging civil war against the separatists?
Ukraine was defending the separatists, right?
Ukraine is the underdog faced with a full invasion by a superpower.
Why hasn't Russia taken out civilian power plants or the Internet if this is a full invasion?
Russia has purposefully hit civilian populace and locations.
Did any of those locations house purported bioweapons labs?
Are you basing this statement on actual evidence or just MSM articles?
There is no reasonably justifiable reason for Russia to invade Ukraine.
Have you considered the Russian claims about biolabs as possibly true? Have you wondered why the US would suddenly remove PDFs and redact information in response to those claims if they had no basis in truth?
Russia is seeking to overthrow the current government to install a puppet regime.
Russia has stated they are supporting the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in their claims for independence and enforcing the Minsk agreements by a show of force.
Ukraine was been at war with these regions for 8 years already.
Those are the facts.
On what basis do you make this claim Russia is trying to overthrow Ukraine and install a puppet regime?
Do you realize the United States did the very thing you're accusing Russia of? Do you know No Name played a big role in the overthrow? Do you even know who No Name is?
Do you realize Joe Biden pressured the US puppet Poroshenko into firing the prosecutor Shokin who was investigating Burisma, the Ukrainian energy company that paid Hunter Biden $50,000 a month, with 10% going to the "Big Guy"?
Do you realize Joe Biden publicly bragged about pressuring Shokin to be fired and the fact checkers claim everybody wanted Shokin fired so that means Joe Biden did nothing wrong?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXA--dj2-CY
Putin is complex and can't be pigeon holed as a "white hat". He has his own motivations that may or may not align with ours.
I wouldn't disagree Putin has his own reasons for fighting against George Soros and the New World Order. I also wouldn't question claims he's taken advantage of his position as Russian leader to enrich himself and his friends and associates.
With that being said, you've provided nothing of substance here to support your positions.
For someone who's presumably religious and an "against the grain", "critical thinker", you seem wholly intolerant to any ideas outside your own.
I've clearly explained my position and provided plenty of support in the form of primary sources.
How can I be intolerant to any ideas outside of my own if it took you this many replies to even share them in the first place?
You'd think a Q follower would be MORE open to a diversity of opinions, but clearly, this is not the case with you.
You'd think a shill/useful idiot who disagrees with Q Drops and supports George Soros would appeal to emotions and lecture others about confirmation bias, nuance, and engage in other forum sliding techniques. This is exactly the case with you.
You have more in common with a libtard: screaming down, name calling, emotional outbursts, one dimensional thinking, intolerance of differences.
As far as name calling, how many times have I called YOU a libtard? I inferred you were a smooth brain from your comments.
There was no screaming down or emotional outbursts from my end. Are you daft?
As far as one dimensional thinking, I've already shared my analysis of Putin. There's no question in my mind he's been feeding himself quite well at the public trough. I don't see him as a virtuous saint who can do nothing wrong.
And as far as intolerance of differences, I fully support your right to believe whatever you want.
For that reason I'm not going to waste my time engaging with you any further. You're not interested in a rational discussion. You're more interested in attacking "frens" on the same team for daring to have a thought that doesn't comport with yours. Pretty lame, really.
Is asking why you support Ukraine repeatedly really an attack? Did I accuse you of not understanding nuance or other Philosophy 101 topics?
Who's the fren blasting fellow frens for repeating pro-Russia propaganda and who's the fren siding with George Soros?