"blatantly disrespectful" was not what was said. This is what was said:

Anyone being blatantly disrespectful and not THINKING and being constructive about what is being laid out here will have their comment/s removed.

So its, "blatantly disrespectful", as well as "not THINKING," and those not "being constructive about what is being laid out here."

All three of those things are a matter of opinion. Whose opinion? One persons. The person with the power to silence anyone who disagrees with their post; their ideas.

Worse than it being substantially broader than you pretend in your protest, it didn't need to be stated at all. It sounds like anyone who disagrees will be silenced. It's literally what he is saying, since "not THINKING" and "not being constructive..." are purely up to the OP to decide. And blatantly disrespectful to whom? The one person who has the power to silence. This is what kings do. Don't be "disrespectful" to the king. Disrespectful by whose measure? The king's of course. Anyone who is offering an opinion of dissension can easily fall into these categories by this one person's assessment.

As usual, you seem to have an Extremely Condescending approach to what you call " engage in conversation"

I always engage in debate over the topic of censorship because in my opinion there is nothing more important. But condescending?

condescending: Displaying a patronizingly superior attitude.

Am I being patronizing?

I am a free speech absolutist. All of my research suggests that silencing dissenting voices is at the very core of all the ills of the world. It is the primary function of The Matrix. It is my belief that such activity is worse than just about anything. There is a reason 1A is the first thing they thought about. We toss it out so easily under the guise of "keeping the peace." Just like every other justification for doing so ever done. When we censor, we engage in precisely the activity that the PTB have used to enslave the world for millennia and people who think they are against their evils justify the same action in the exact same manner.

I find it disgusting. If that comes across as "condescending" that is not intentional. I hate it with every core of my being. It is to me the greatest evil. All other evils stem from this activity. Let me repeat that: ALL OTHER EVILS STEM FROM CENSORSHIP OF DISSENTING OPINIONS.

If I speak out against it, it is not condescension, but abhoration.

"blatantly disrespectful" was not what was said. This is what was said:

Anyone being blatantly disrespectful and not THINKING and being constructive about what is being laid out here will have their comment/s removed.

So its, "blatantly disrespectful", as well as "not THINKING," and those not "being constructive about what is being laid out here."

All three of those things are a matter of opinion. Whose opinion? One persons. The person with the power to silence anyone who disagrees with their post; their ideas.

Worse than it being substantially broader than you pretend in your protest, it didn't need to be stated at all. It sounds like anyone who disagrees will be silenced. It's literally what he is saying, since "not THINKING" and "not being constructive..." are purely up to the OP to decide. And blatantly disrespectful to whom? The one person who has the power to silence. This is what kings do. Don't be "disrespectful" to the king. Disrespectful by whose measure? The king's of course. Anyone who is offering an opinion of dissension can easily fall into these categories by this one person's assessment.

As usual, you seem to have an Extremely Condescending approach to what you call " engage in conversation"

I always engage in debate over the topic of censorship because in my opinion there is nothing more important. But condescending?

condescending: Displaying a patronizingly superior attitude.

Am I being patronizing?

I am a free speech absolutist. All of my research suggests that silencing dissenting voices is at the very core of all the ills of the world. It is the primary function of The Matrix. It is my belief that such activity is worse than just about anything. There is a reason 1A is the first thing they thought about. We toss it out so easily under the guise of "keeping the peace." Just like every other justification for doing so ever done. When we censor, we engage in precisely the activity that the PTB have used to enslave the world for millennia and people justify it in the exact same manner.

I find it disgusting. If that comes across as "condescending" that is not intentional. I hate it with every core of my being. It is to me the greatest evil. All other evils stem from this activity. Let me repeat that: ALL OTHER EVILS STEM FROM CENSORSHIP OF DISSENTING OPINIONS.

If I speak out against it, it is not condescension, but abhoration.

"blatantly disrespectful" was not what was said. This is what was said:

Anyone being blatantly disrespectful and not THINKING and being constructive about what is being laid out here will have their comment/s removed.

So its, "blatantly disrespectful", as well as "not THINKING," and those not "being constructive about what is being laid out here."

All three of those things are a matter of opinion. Whose opinion? One persons. The person with the power to silence anyone who disagrees with their post; their ideas.

Worse than it being substantially broader than you pretend in your protest, it didn't need to be stated at all. It sounds like anyone who disagrees will be silenced. It's literally what he is saying, since "not THINKING" and "not being constructive..." are purely up to the OP to decide. And blatantly disrespectful to whom? The one person who has the power to silence. This is what kings do. Don't be "disrespectful" to the king. Disrespectful by whose measure? The king's of course. Anyone who is offering an opinion of dissension can easily fall into these categories by this one persons assessment.

As usual, you seem to have an Extremely Condescending approach to what you call " engage in conversation"

I always engage in debate over the topic of censorship because in my opinion there is nothing more important. But condescending?

condescending: Displaying a patronizingly superior attitude.

Am I being patronizing?

I am a free speech absolutist. All of my research suggests that silencing dissenting voices is at the very core of all the ills of the world. It is the primary function of The Matrix. It is my belief that such activity is worse than just about anything. There is a reason 1A is the first thing they thought about. We toss it out so easily under the guise of "keeping the peace." Just like every other justification for doing so ever done. When we censor, we engage in precisely the activity that the PTB have used to enslave the world for millennia and people justify it in the exact same manner.

I find it disgusting. If that comes across as "condescending" that is not intentional. I hate it with every core of my being. It is to me the greatest evil. All other evils stem from this activity. Let me repeat that: ALL OTHER EVILS STEM FROM CENSORSHIP OF DISSENTING OPINIONS.

If I speak out against it, it is not condescension, but abhoration.

"blatantly disrespectful" was not what was said. This is what was said:

Anyone being blatantly disrespectful and not THINKING and being constructive about what is being laid out here will have their comment/s removed.

So its, "blatantly disrespectful", as well as "not THINKING," and those not "being constructive about what is being laid out here."

All three of those things are a matter of opinion. Whose opinion? One persons. The person with the power to silence anyone who disagrees with their post; their ideas.

Worse than it being substantially broader than you pretend in your protest, it didn't need to be stated at all. It sounds like anyone who disagrees with be silenced. It's literally what he is saying, since "not THINKING" and "not being constructive..." are purely up to the OP to decide. And blatantly disrespectful to whom? The one person who has the power to silence. This is what kings do. Don't be "disrespectful" to the king. Disrespectful by whose measure? The king's of course. Anyone who is offering an opinion of dissension can easily fall into these categories by this one persons assessment.

As usual, you seem to have an Extremely Condescending approach to what you call " engage in conversation"

I always engage in debate over the topic of censorship because in my opinion there is nothing more important. But condescending?

condescending: Displaying a patronizingly superior attitude.

Am I being patronizing?

I am a free speech absolutist. All of my research suggests that silencing dissenting voices is at the very core of all the ills of the world. It is the primary function of The Matrix. It is my belief that such activity is worse than just about anything. There is a reason 1A is the first thing they thought about. We toss it out so easily under the guise of "keeping the peace." Just like every other justification for doing so ever done. When we censor, we engage in precisely the activity that the PTB have used to enslave the world for millennia and people justify it in the exact same manner.

I find it disgusting. If that comes across as "condescending" that is not intentional. I hate it with every core of my being. It is to me the greatest evil. All other evils stem from this activity. Let me repeat that: ALL OTHER EVILS STEM FROM CENSORSHIP OF DISSENTING OPINIONS.

If I speak out against it, it is not condescension, but abhoration.