Good point.

So, obviously let's not ignore it. Instead, let's try to understand it, but from multiple perspectives and not via a simple knee-jerk assessment. More digging is required.

E.g. what if Z is a double agent? Someone who plays like he's on THEIR side, but is actually on NOT THEIR side?

Good point.

So, obviously let's not ignore it. Instead, let's try to understand it, but from multiple perspectives and not via a simple knee-jerk assessment. More digging it required.

E.g. what is Z is a double agent? Someone who plays like he's on THEIR side, but is actually on NOT THEIR side?