Those are remarkable claims that require remarkable evidence to rise to the level of having been “proven.” It’s like something out of a bad fanfiction story.
Watching it now, will have to finish it later but I’m not seeing “proof” of anything. Maybe I’ll see it later in the vid. Keeping my mind open. Definitely WANT to believe.
But even just the Larry Johnson call. The voice on the phone identifying himself as Johnson proves nothing. No other names were even mentioned in the call so even if it’s him we can’t prove he was speaking about the people she claims. Then she says “lady and gentlemen, this IS PROOF.” (Paraphrasing)
Is it?
We have to stop throwing that word around it makes us look ridiculous when it’s nothing of the sort.
She says she has the Italian intercept. Ok. Where is it? Can you prove it’s real? She offers NOTHING in the way of verification.
She makes one claim after another that to a normal person would rightfully seem outrageous but offers nothing to back most of them up. This is infuriating. This is exactly how and why this type of stuff gets ignored.
There could be 50 million fraudulent ballots but until we can nail down how many exactly were for each candidate, or how many were switched to whom, we haven’t proven anything.
If Democrats can just say “maybe all those bad ballots were for Trump” we have haven’t proven anything. That’s the next line of defense that they are probably already preparing.
And for much of the rest of her claims they can simply brush it off as bad fiction. She does almost nothing at all to even begin backing it up.
Those are remarkable claims that require remarkable evidence to rise to the level of having been “proven.” It’s like something out of a bad fanfiction story.
Watching it now, will have to finish it later but I’m not seeing “proof” of anything. Maybe I’ll see it later in the vid. Keeping my mind open. Definitely WANT to believe.
But even just the Larry Johnson call. The voice on the phone identifying himself as Johnson proves nothing. No other names were even mentioned in the call so even if it’s him we can’t prove he was speaking about the people she claims. Then she says “lady and gentlemen, this IS PROOF.” (Paraphrasing)
Is it?
We have to stop throwing that word around it makes us look ridiculous when it’s nothing of the sort.
She says she has the Italian intercept. Ok. Where is it? Can you prove it’s real? She offers NOTHING in the way of verification.
She makes one claim after another that to a normal person would rightfully seem outrageous but offers nothing to back most of them up. This is infuriating. This is exactly how and why this type of stuff gets ignored.
There could be 50 million fraudulent ballots but until we can nail down how many exactly were for each candidate, or how many were switched to whom, we haven’t proven anything.
If Democrats can just say “maybe all those bad ballots were for Trump” we have haven’t proven anything. That’s the next line of defense that they are probably already preparing.
Those are remarkable claims that require remarkable evidence to rise to the level of having been “proven.” It’s like something out of a bad fanfiction story.
Watching it now, will have to finish it later but I’m not seeing “proof” of anything. Maybe I’ll see it later in the vid. Keeping my mind open. Definitely WANT to believe.
But even just the Larry Johnson call. The voice on the phone identifying himself as Johnson proves nothing. No other names were even mentioned in the call so even if it’s him we can’t prove he was speaking about the people she claims. Then she says “lady and gentlemen, this IS PROOF.” (Paraphrasing)
Is it?
We have to stop throwing that word around it makes us look ridiculous when it’s nothing of the sort.
She says she has the Italian intercept. Ok. Where is it? Can you prove it’s real? She offers NOTHING in the way of verification.
There could be 50 million fraudulent ballots but until we can nail down how many exactly were for each candidate, or how many were switched to whom, we haven’t proven anything.
If Democrats can just say “maybe all those bad ballots were for Trump” we have haven’t proven anything. That’s the next line of defense that they are probably already preparing.
Those are remarkable claims that require remarkable evidence to rise to the level of having been “proven.” It’s like something out of a bad fanfiction story.
Watching it now, will have to finish it later but I’m not seeing “proof” of anything. Maybe I’ll see it later in the vid. Keeping my mind open. Definitely WANT to believe.
But even just the Larry Johnson call. The voice on the phone identifying himself as Johnson proves nothing. No other names were even mentioned in the call so even if it’s him we can’t prove he was speaking about the people she claims. Then she says “lady and gentlemen, this IS PROOF.” (Paraphrasing)
Is it?
We have to stop throwing that word around it makes us look ridiculous when it’s nothing of the sort.
There could be 50 million fraudulent ballots but until we can nail down how many exactly were for each candidate, or how many were switched to whom, we haven’t proven anything.
If Democrats can just say “maybe all those bad ballots were for Trump” we have haven’t proven anything. That’s the next line of defense that they are probably already preparing.
Those are remarkable claims that require remarkable evidence to rise to the level of having been “proven.” It’s like something out of a bad fanfiction story.
Watching it now, will have to finish it later but I’m not seeing “proof” of anything. Maybe I’ll see it later in the vid. Keeping my mind open. Definitely WANT to believe.
There could be 50 million fraudulent ballots but until we can nail down how many exactly were for each candidate, or how many were switched to whom, we haven’t proven anything.
If Democrats can just say “maybe all those bad ballots were for Trump” we have haven’t proven anything. That’s the next line of defense that they are probably already preparing.