Deltas can be viewed that way, yes, except that Q instructed us very specifically to use the deltas. The whole concept of it is brilliant, actually. Q tells us to look at specific people to post messages with deltas that have very specific content related to Q posts. They ask over and over "How many coincidences until it's impossible?". Yes, people can always see patterns in things, but the specific alignment with which the posts always seem to line up, and the fact that, if you've read Q's posts front to back, Q gave specific instructions on COMMS. It's true - even a handful of those coincidences can be written off, but there are too many specific and highly contextual instances.

The time traveling stuff I write off. Much of the crazy shit I write off. What I do not write off is Q's own words and what they have said and specifically instructed. Nobody here invented deltas. Deltas were instructed by Q, and then the correct usage of them was also confirmed by Q.

Deltas can be viewed that way, yes, except that Q instructed us very specifically to use the deltas. The whole concept of it is brilliant, actually. Q tells us to look at specific people to post messages with deltas that have very specific content related to Q posts. They ask over and over "How many coincidences until it's impossible?". Yes, people can always see patterns in things, but the specific alignment with which the posts always seem to line up, and the fact that, if you've read Q's posts front to back, Q gave specific instructions on COMMS. It's true - even a handful of those coincidences can be written off, but there are too many specific and highly contextual instances.

The time traveling stuff I write off. Much of the crazy shit I write off. What I do not write off is Q's own words and what they have said and specifically instructed.