Not to beat yesterday's horse, but you deserve an answer, your rebuttals are always thoughtful.

What is your definition of "limitation"?

A limit is an absolute boundary. It can't be crossed. By definition, a limit is impossible to get past. In math it bounds a function. A function can never cross a limit. This isn't just the definition in math, it is the definition in English as well:

limit: something that bounds, restrains, or confines: the utmost extent

If you are limited, it means you can't do something. For example, I have a limit in that I can't fly.

Or at least I believe I have that limit.

But really, ever since the early 20th century, we can fly (likely long before, but I'm not going there right now). I have actually flown many times. I've flown in planes, a helicopter and even a balloon. So what I may have believed to be a limit in the 15th century (for example) of "I can't fly", would have by the 20th century needed to be changed to, "I can't fly, unless it is in an airplane, helicopter, zeppelin, balloon, glider, rocket, etc."

So that's my new, 20th century limit (changed because of new evidence). But what if someday someone invents anti-gravity boots, Star Trek (Spock) style? Then I would have to add "anti-grav boots" onto my list, and my "limits" will have to be changed, proving that my limits were not what I believed them to be, once again. But what if someday I learn how to levitate with my mind? I'm not saying its possible, but what the fuck do I know? Then how would "I can't fly" have any meaning as a "limit"? It would turn out that everything I thought I knew about that limit was fraudulent; a belief I told myself (or someone else told me) that was either a lie, or a lack of understanding. It was, regardless, at every stage, a false belief; a false limit.

How animals behave, how the stars behave, how everything behaves is playing the same tune on a different instrument. It's all the exact same thing, but in a different frame of reference.

This is your belief of how the universe works. I don't disagree with it. I see those patterns as well, and seeing those patterns is very useful in the decision making process. The problem lies with believing that those patterns are Truth, instead of just patterns that are useful.

The Truth is what It Is. If you categorize it, and attempt to limit it, you are overlaying Reality with your beliefs, and attempting to force Reality to fit within the limits your beliefs have defined. We all want Reality to fit our beliefs. Our ego demands it, and we have been taught to do that since birth.

But the Truth AKA That Which Is AKA God does not care about your beliefs of what is Real. Reality will go on just fine without your beliefs of what it is (which change in small to large ways every day). That doesn't mean your beliefs aren't influential on Reality; we are a fundamental part of it, but Reality is not reliant on your beliefs. It simply Is What It Is.

Not to beat yesterday's horse, but you deserve an answer, your rebuttals are always thoughtful.

What is your definition of "limitation"?

A limit is an absolute boundary. It can't be crossed. By definition, a limit is impossible to get past. In math it bounds a function. A function can never cross a limit. This isn't just the definition in math, it is the definition in English as well:

limit: something that bounds, restrains, or confines: the utmost extent

If you are limited, it means you can't do something. For example, I have a limit in that I can't fly.

Or at least I believe I have that limit.

But really, ever since the early 20th century, we can fly (likely long before, but I'm not going there right now). I have actually flown many times. I've flown in planes, a helicopter and even a balloon. So what I may have believed to be a limit in the 15th century (for example) of "I can't fly", would have by the 20th century needed to be changed to, "I can't fly, unless it is in an airplane, helicopter, zeppelin, balloon, glider, rocket, etc."

So that's my new, 20th century limit (changed because of new evidence). But what if someday someone invents anti-gravity boots, Star Trek (Spock) style? Then I would have to add "anti-grav boots" onto my list, and my "limits" will have to be changed, proving that my limits were not what I believed them to be, once again. But what if someday I learn how to levitate with my mind? I'm not saying its possible, but what the fuck do I know? Then how would "I can't fly" have any meaning as a "limit"? It would turn out that everything I thought I knew about that limit was fraudulent; a belief I told myself (or someone else told me) that was either a lie, or a lack of understanding. It was, regardless, at every stage, a false belief; a false limit.

How animals behave, how the stars behave, how everything behaves is playing the same tune on a different instrument. It's all the exact same thing, but in a different frame of reference.

This is your belief of how the universe works. I don't disagree with it. I see those patterns as well, and seeing those patterns is very useful in the decision making process. The problem lies with believing that those patterns are Truth, instead of just patterns that are useful.

The Truth is what It Is. If you categorize it, and attempt to limit it, you are overlaying Reality with your beliefs, and attempting to force Reality to fit within those limits. We all want Reality to fit our beliefs. Our ego demands it, and we have been taught to do that since birth.

But the Truth AKA That Which Is AKA God does not care about your beliefs of what is Real. Reality will go on just fine without your beliefs of what it is (which change in small to large ways every day). That doesn't mean your beliefs aren't influential on Reality; we are a fundamental part of it, but Reality is not reliant on your beliefs. It simply Is What It Is.

Not to beat yesterday's horse, but you deserve an answer, your rebuttals are always thoughtful.

What is your definition of "limitation"?

A limit is an absolute boundary. It can't be crossed. By definition, a limit is impossible to get past. In math it bounds a function. A function can never cross a limit. This isn't just the definition in math, it is the definition in English as well:

limit: something that bounds, restrains, or confines: the utmost extent

If you are limited, it means you can't do something. For example, I have a limit in that I can't fly.

Or at least I believe I have that limit.

But really, ever since the early 20th century, we can fly (likely long before, but I'm not going there right now). I have actually flown many times. I've flown in planes, a helicopter and even a balloon. So what I may have believed to be a limit in the 15th century (for example) of "I can't fly", would have by the 20th century needed to be changed to, "I can't fly, unless it is in an airplane, helicopter, zeppelin, balloon, glider, rocket, etc."

So that's my new, 20th century limit (changed because of new evidence). But what if someday someone invents anti-gravity boots, Star Trek (Spock) style? Then I would have to add "anti-grav boots" onto my list, and my "limits" have changed, proving that my limits were not what I believed them to be, once again. But what if someday I learn how to levitate with my mind? I'm not saying its possible, but what the fuck do I know? Then how would "I can't fly" have any meaning as a "limit"? It would turn out that everything I thought I knew about that limit was fraudulent; a belief I told myself (or someone else told me) that was either a lie, or a lack of understanding. It was, regardless, at every stage, a false belief; a false limit.

How animals behave, how the stars behave, how everything behaves is playing the same tune on a different instrument. It's all the exact same thing, but in a different frame of reference.

This is your belief of how the universe works. I don't disagree with it. I see those patterns as well, and seeing those patterns is very useful in the decision making process. The problem lies with believing that those patterns are Truth, instead of just patterns that are useful.

The Truth is what It Is. If you categorize it, and attempt to limit it, you are overlaying Reality with your beliefs, and attempting to force Reality to fit within those limits. We all want Reality to fit our beliefs. Our ego demands it, and we have been taught to do that since birth.

But the Truth AKA That Which Is AKA God does not care about your beliefs of what is Real. Reality will go on just fine without your beliefs of what it is (which change in small to large ways every day). That doesn't mean your beliefs aren't influential on Reality; we are a fundamental part of it, but Reality is not reliant on your beliefs. It simply Is What It Is.

Not to beat yesterday's horse, but you deserve an answer, your rebuttals are always thoughtful.

What is your definition of "limitation"?

A limit is an absolute boundary. It can't be crossed. By definition, a limit is impossible to get past. In math it bounds a function. A function can never cross a limit. This isn't just the definition in math, it is the definition in English as well:

limit: something that bounds, restrains, or confines: the utmost extent

If you are limited, it means you can't do something. For example, I have a limit in that I can't fly.

Or at least I believe I have that limit.

But really, ever since the early 20th century, we can fly (likely long before, but I'm not going there right now). I have actually flown many times. I've flown in planes, a helicopter and even a balloon. So what I may have believed to be a limit in the 15th century (for example) of "I can't fly", would have by the 20th century needed to be changed to, "I can't fly, unless it is in an airplane, helicopter, zeppelin, balloon, glider, rocket, etc."

So that's my limit. But what if someday someone invents anti-gravity boots, Star Trek (Spock) style? Then I would have to add "anti-grav boots" onto my list, and my "limits" have changed, proving that my limits were not what I believed them to be, once again. But what if someday I learn how to levitate with my mind? I'm not saying its possible, but what the fuck do I know? Then how would "I can't fly" have any meaning as a "limit"? It would turn out that everything I thought I knew about that limit was fraudulent; a belief I told myself (or someone else told me) that was either a lie, or a lack of understanding. It was, regardless, at every stage, a false belief; a false limit.

How animals behave, how the stars behave, how everything behaves is playing the same tune on a different instrument. It's all the exact same thing, but in a different frame of reference.

This is your belief of how the universe works. I don't disagree with it. I see those patterns as well, and seeing those patterns is very useful in the decision making process. The problem lies with believing that those patterns are Truth, instead of just patterns that are useful.

The Truth is what It Is. If you categorize it, and attempt to limit it, you are overlaying Reality with your beliefs, and attempting to force Reality to fit within those limits. We all want Reality to fit our beliefs. Our ego demands it, and we have been taught to do that since birth.

But the Truth AKA That Which Is AKA God does not care about your beliefs of what is Real. Reality will go on just fine without your beliefs of what it is (which change in small to large ways every day). That doesn't mean your beliefs aren't influential on Reality; we are a fundamental part of it, but Reality is not reliant on your beliefs. It simply Is What It Is.

Not to beat yesterday's horse, but you deserve an answer, your rebuttals are always thoughtful.

What is your definition of "limitation"?

A limit is an absolute boundary. It can't be crossed. By definition, a limit is impossible to get past. In math it bounds a function. A function can never cross a limit. This isn't just the definition in math, it is the definition in English as well:

limit: something that bounds, restrains, or confines: the utmost extent

If you are limited, it means you can't do something. For example, I have a limit in that I can't fly.

Or at least I believe I have that limit.

But really, ever since the early 20th century, we can fly (likely long before, but I'm not going there right now). I have actually flown many times. I've flown in planes, a helicopter and even a balloon. So what I may have believed to be a limit in the 15th century (for example) of "I can't fly", would have by the 20th century needed to be changed to, "I can't fly, unless it is in an airplane, helicopter, zeppelin, balloon, glider, rocket, etc."

So that's my limit. But what if someday someone invents anti-gravity boots, Star Trek (Spock) style? Then I would have to add "anti-grav boots" onto my list, and my "limits" have changed, proving that my limits were not what I believed them to be, once again. But what if someday I learn how to levitate with my mind? I'm not saying its possible, but what the fuck do I know? Then how would "I can't fly" have any meaning as a "limit"? It would turn out that everything I thought I knew about that limit was fraudulent; a belief I told myself (or someone else told me) that was either a lie, or a lack of understanding. It was, regardless, at every stage, a false belief; a false limit.

How animals behave, how the stars behave, how everything behaves is playing the same tune on a different instrument. It's all the exact same thing, but in a different frame of reference.

This is your belief of how the universe works. I don't disagree with it. I see those patterns as well, and seeing those patterns is very useful in the decision making process. The problem lies with believing that those patterns are Truth, instead of just patterns that are useful.

The Truth is what It Is. If you categorize it, and attempt to limit it, you are overlaying Reality with your beliefs, and attempting to force Reality to fit within those limits. The Truth AKA That Which Is AKA God does not care about your beliefs of what is Real. Reality will go on just fine without your beliefs of what it is (which change in small to large ways every day). That doesn't mean your beliefs aren't influential on Reality; we are a fundamental part of it, but Reality is not reliant on your beliefs. It simply Is What It Is.

Not to beat yesterday's horse, but you deserve an answer, your rebuttals are always thoughtful.

What is your definition of "limitation"?

A limit is an absolute boundary. It can't be crossed. By definition, a limit is impossible to get past. In math it bounds a function. A function can never cross a limit. This isn't just the definition in math, it is the definition in English as well:

limit: something that bounds, restrains, or confines: the utmost extent

If you are limited, it means you can't do something. For example, I have a limit in that I can't fly.

Or at least I believe I have that limit.

But really, ever since the early 20th century, we can fly (likely long before, but I'm not going there right now). I have actually flown many times. I've flown in planes, a helicopter and even a balloon. So what I may have believed to be a limit in the 15th century (for example) of "I can't fly", would have by the 20th century needed to be changed to, "I can't fly, unless it is in an airplane, helicopter, zeppelin, balloon, glider, rocket, etc."

So that's my limit. But what if someday someone invents anti-gravity boots, Star Trek (Spock) style? Then I would have to add "anti-grav boots" onto my list, and my "limits" have changed, proving that my limits were not what I believed them to be, once again. But what if someday I learn how to levitate with my mind? I'm not saying its possible, but what the fuck do I know? Then how would "I can't fly" have any meaning as a "limit"? It would turn out that everything I thought I knew about that limit was fraudulent; a belief I told myself (or someone else told me) that was either a lie, or a lack of understanding. It was, regardless, at every stage, a false belief; a false limit.

How animals behave, how the stars behave, how everything behaves is playing the same tune on a different instrument. It's all the exact same thing, but in a different frame of reference.

This is your belief of how the universe works. I don't disagree with it. I see those patterns as well, and seeing those patterns is very useful in the decision making process. The problem lies with believing that those patterns are Truth, instead of just patterns that are useful.

The Truth is what It Is. If you categorize it, and attempt to limit it, you are overlaying Reality with your beliefs, and attempting to force Reality to fit within your beliefs. The Truth AKA That Which Is AKA God does not care about your beliefs of what is Real. Reality will go on just fine without your beliefs of what it is (which change in small to large ways every day). That doesn't mean your beliefs aren't influential on Reality; we are a fundamental part of it, but Reality is not reliant on your beliefs. It simply Is What It Is.

Not to beat yesterday's horse, but you deserve an answer, your rebuttals are always thoughtful.

What is your definition of "limitation"?

A limit is an absolute boundary. It can't be crossed. By definition, a limit is impossible to get past. In math it bounds a function. A function can never cross a limit. This isn't just the definition in math, it is the definition in English as well:

limit: something that bounds, restrains, or confines: the utmost extent

If you are limited, it means you can't do something. For example, I have a limit in that I can't fly.

Or at least I believe I have that limit.

But really, ever since the early 20th century, we can fly (likely long before, but I'm not going there right now). I have actually flown many times. I've flown in planes, a helicopter and even a balloon. So what I may have believed to be a limit in the 15th century (for example) of "I can't fly", would have by the 20th century needed to be changed to, "I can't fly, unless it is in an airplane, helicopter, zeppelin, balloon, glider, rocket, etc."

So that's my limit. But what if someday someone invents anti-gravity boots, Star Trek (Spock) style? Then I would have to add "anti-grav boots" onto my list, and my "limits" have changed, proving that my limits were not what I believed them to be, once again. But what if someday I learn how to levitate with my mind? I'm not saying its possible, but what the fuck do I know? Then how would "I can't fly" have any meaning as a "limit"? It would turn out that everything I thought I knew about that limit was fraudulent; a belief I told myself (or someone else told me) that was either a lie, or a lack of understanding. It was, regardless, at every stage, a false belief; a false limit.

How animals behave, how the stars behave, how everything behaves is playing the same tune on a different instrument. It's all the exact same thing, but in a different frame of reference.

This is your belief of how the universe works. I don't disagree with it. I see those patterns as well, and seeing those patterns is very useful in the decision making process. The problem lies with believing that those patterns are Truth, instead of just patterns that are useful.

The Truth is what It Is. If you categorize it, and attempt to limit it, you are overlaying reality with your beliefs, and attempting to force Reality to fit within your beliefs. The Truth AKA That Which Is AKA God does not care about your beliefs of what is Real. Reality will go on just fine without your beliefs of what it is (which change in small to large ways every day). That doesn't mean your beliefs aren't influential on Reality; we are a fundamental part of it, but Reality is not reliant on your beliefs. It simply Is What It Is.

Not to beat yesterday's horse, but you deserve an answer, your rebuttals are always thoughtful.

What is your definition of "limitation"?

A limit is an absolute boundary. It can't be crossed. By definition, a limit is impossible to get past. In math it bounds a function. A function can never cross a limit. This isn't just the definition in math, it is the definition in English as well:

limit: something that bounds, restrains, or confines: the utmost extent

If you are limited, it means you can't do something. For example, I have a limit in that I can't fly.

Or at least I believe I have that limit.

But really, ever since the early 20th century, we can fly (likely long before, but I'm not going there right now). I have actually flown many times. I've flown in planes, a helicopter and even a balloon. So what I may have believed to be a limit in the 15th century (for example) of "I can't fly", would have by the 20th century needed to be changed to, "I can't fly, unless it is in an airplane, helicopter, zeppelin, balloon, glider, rocket, etc."

So that's my limit. But what if someday someone invents anti-gravity boots, Star Trek (Spock) style? Then I would have to add "anti-grav boots" onto my list, and my "limits" have changed, proving that my limits were not what I believed them to be, once again. But what if someday I learn how to levitate with my mind? I'm not saying its possible, but what the fuck do I know? Then how would "I can't fly" have any meaning as a "limit"? It would turn out that everything I thought I knew about that limit was fraudulent; a belief I told myself (or someone else told me) that was either a lie, or a lack of understanding. It was, regardless, at every stage, a false belief; a false limit.

How animals behave, how the stars behave, how everything behaves is playing the same tune on a different instrument. It's all the exact same thing, but in a different frame of reference.

This is your belief of how the universe works. I don't disagree with it. I see those patterns as well, and seeing those patterns is very useful in the decision making process. The problem lies with believing that those patterns are Truth, instead of just patterns that are useful.

The Truth is what It Is. If you categorize it, and attempt to limit it, you are putting your beliefs into it. The Truth AKA That Which Is AKA God does not care about your beliefs of what is Real. Reality will go on just fine without your beliefs of what it is (which change in small to large ways every day). That doesn't mean your beliefs aren't influential on Reality; we are a fundamental part of it, but Reality is not reliant on your beliefs. It simply Is What It Is.

Not to beat yesterday's horse, but you deserve an answer, your rebuttals are always thoughtful.

What is your definition of "limitation"?

A limit is an absolute boundary. It can't be crossed. By definition, a limit is impossible to get past. In math it bounds a function. A function can never cross a limit. This isn't just the definition in math, it is the definition in English as well:

limit: something that bounds, restrains, or confines: the utmost extent

If you are limited, it means you can't do something. For example, I have the limit in that I can't fly.

Or at least I believe I have that limit.

But really, ever since the early 20th century, we can fly (likely long before, but I'm not going there right now). I have actually flown many times. I've flown in planes, a helicopter and even a balloon. So what I may have believed to be a limit in the 17th century (for example) of "I can't fly", would have by the 20th century needed to be changed to, "I can't fly, unless it is in an airplane, helicopter, zeppelin, balloon, glider, rocket, etc."

So that's my limit. But what if someday someone invents anti-gravity boots, Star Trek (Spock) style? Then I would have to add "anti-grav boots" onto my list, and my "limits" have changed, proving that my limits were not what I believed them to be, once again. But what if someday I learn how to levitate with my mind? I'm not saying its possible, but what the fuck do I know? Then how would "I can't fly" have any meaning as a "limit"? It would turn out that everything I thought I knew about that limit was fraudulent; a belief I told myself (or someone else told me) that was either a lie, or a lack of understanding. It was, regardless, at every stage, a false belief; a false limit.

How animals behave, how the stars behave, how everything behaves is playing the same tune on a different instrument. It's all the exact same thing, but in a different frame of reference.

This is your belief of how the universe works. I don't disagree with it. I see those patterns as well, and seeing those patterns is very useful in the decision making process. The problem lies with believing that those patterns are Truth, instead of just patterns that are useful.

The Truth is what It Is. If you categorize it, and attempt to limit it, you are putting your beliefs into it. The Truth AKA That Which Is AKA God does not care about your beliefs of what is Real. Reality will go on just fine without your beliefs of what it is (which change in small to large ways every day). That doesn't mean your beliefs aren't influential on Reality; we are a fundamental part of it, but Reality is not reliant on your beliefs. It simply Is What It Is.

Not to beat yesterday's horse, but you deserve an answer, your rebuttals are always thoughtful.

What is your definition of "limitation"?

A limit is a boundary. It can't be crossed. By definition, a limit is impossible to get past. In math it bounds a function. A function can never cross a limit. This isn't just the definition in math, it is the definition in English as well:

limit: something that bounds, restrains, or confines: the utmost extent

If you are limited, it means you can't do something. For example, I have the limit in that I can't fly.

Or at least I believe I have that limit.

But really, ever since the early 20th century, we can fly (likely long before, but I'm not going there right now). I have actually flown many times. I've flown in planes, a helicopter and even a balloon. So what I may have believed to be a limit in the 17th century (for example) of "I can't fly", would have by the 20th century needed to be changed to, "I can't fly, unless it is in an airplane, helicopter, zeppelin, balloon, glider, rocket, etc."

So that's my limit. But what if someday someone invents anti-gravity boots, Star Trek (Spock) style? Then I would have to add "anti-grav boots" onto my list, and my "limits" have changed, proving that my limits were not what I believed them to be, once again. But what if someday I learn how to levitate with my mind? I'm not saying its possible, but what the fuck do I know? Then how would "I can't fly" have any meaning as a "limit"? It would turn out that everything I thought I knew about that limit was fraudulent; a belief I told myself (or someone else told me) that was either a lie, or a lack of understanding. It was, regardless, at every stage, a false belief; a false limit.

How animals behave, how the stars behave, how everything behaves is playing the same tune on a different instrument. It's all the exact same thing, but in a different frame of reference.

This is your belief of how the universe works. I don't disagree with it. I see those patterns as well, and seeing those patterns is very useful in the decision making process. The problem lies with believing that those patterns are Truth, instead of just patterns that are useful.

The Truth is what It Is. If you categorize it, and attempt to limit it, you are putting your beliefs into it. The Truth AKA That Which Is AKA God does not care about your beliefs of what is Real. Reality will go on just fine without your beliefs of what it is (which change in small to large ways every day). That doesn't mean your beliefs aren't influential on Reality; we are a fundamental part of it, but Reality is not reliant on your beliefs. It simply Is What It Is.

Not to beat yesterday's horse, but you deserve an answer, your rebuttals are always thoughtful.

What is your definition of "limitation"?

A limit is a boundary. It can't be crossed. By definition, a limit is impossible to get past. In math it bounds a function. A function can never cross a limit. This isn't just the definition in math, it is the definition in English as well:

limit: something that bounds, restrains, or confines: the utmost extent

If you are limited, it means you can't do something. For example, I have the limit in that I can't fly.

Or at least I believe I have that limit.

But really, ever since the early 20th century, we can fly (likely long before, but I'm not going there right now). I have actually flown many times. I've flown in planes, a helicopter and even a balloon. So what I may have believed to be a limit in the 17th century (for example) of "I can't fly", would have by the 20th century needed to be changed to, "I can't fly, unless it is in an airplane, helicopter, zeppelin, balloon, glider, rocket, etc."

So that's my limit. But what if someday someone invents anti-gravity boots, Star Trek (Spock) style? Then I would have to add "anti-grav boots" onto my list, and my "limits" have changed, proving that my limits were not what I believed them to be, once again. But what if someday I learn how to levitate with my mind? I'm not saying its possible, but what the fuck do I know? Then how would "I can't fly" have any meaning as a "limit"? It would turn out that everything I thought I knew about that limit was fraudulent; a belief I told myself (or someone else told me) that was either a lie, or a lack of understanding. It was, regardless, at every stage, a false belief; a false limit.

How animals behave, how the stars behave, how everything behaves is playing the same tune on a different instrument. It's all the exact same thing, but in a different frame of reference.

This is your belief of how the universe works. I don't disagree with it. I see those patterns as well, and seeing those patterns is very useful in the decision making process. The problem lies with believing that those patterns are Truth, instead of just patterns that are useful.

The Truth is what It Is. If you categorize it, and attempt to limit it, you are putting your beliefs into it. The Truth AKA That Which Is AKA God does not care about your beliefs of what is Real. Reality will go on just fine without your beliefs of what it is (which change in small to large ways every day). That doesn't mean your beliefs aren't influential on Reality; we are a fundamental part of it, but it is not reliant on it. It simply Is What It Is.

Not to beat yesterday's horse, but you deserve an answer, your rebuttals are always thoughtful.

What is your definition of "limitation"?

A limit is a boundary. It can't be crossed. By definition, a limit is impossible to get past. In math it bounds a function. A function can never cross a limit. This isn't just the definition in math, it is the definition in English as well:

limit: something that bounds, restrains, or confines: the utmost extent

If you are limited, it means you can't do something. For example, I have the limit in that I can't fly.

Or at least I believe I have that limit.

But really, ever since the early 20th century, we can fly (likely long before, but I'm not going there right now). I have actually flown many times. I've even flown in planes, a helicopter and even a balloon. So what I may have believed to be a limit in the 17th century (for example) of "I can't fly", would have by the 20th century needed to be changed to, "I can't fly, unless it is in an airplane, helicopter, zeppelin, balloon, glider, rocket, etc."

So that's my limit. But what if someday someone invents anti-gravity boots, Star Trek (Spock) style? Then I would have to add "anti-grav boots" onto my list, and my "limits" have changed, proving that my limits were not what I believed them to be, once again. But what if someday I learn how to levitate with my mind? I'm not saying its possible, but what the fuck do I know? Then how would "I can't fly" have any meaning as a "limit"? It would turn out that everything I thought I knew about that limit was fraudulent; a belief I told myself (or someone else told me) that was either a lie, or a lack of understanding. It was, regardless, at every stage, a false belief; a false limit.

How animals behave, how the stars behave, how everything behaves is playing the same tune on a different instrument. It's all the exact same thing, but in a different frame of reference.

This is your belief of how the universe works. I don't disagree with it. I see those patterns as well, and seeing those patterns is very useful in the decision making process. The problem lies with believing that those patterns are Truth, instead of just patterns that are useful.

The Truth is what It Is. If you categorize it, and attempt to limit it, you are putting your beliefs into it. The Truth AKA That Which Is AKA God does not care about your beliefs of what is Real. Reality will go on just fine without your beliefs of what it is (which change in small to large ways every day). That doesn't mean your beliefs aren't influential on Reality; we are a fundamental part of it, but it is not reliant on it. It simply Is What It Is.

Not to beat yesterday's horse, but you deserve an answer, your rebuttals are always thoughtful.

What is your definition of "limitation"?

A limit is a boundary. It can't be crossed. By definition, a limit is impossible to get past. In math it bounds a function. A function can never cross a limit. This isn't just the definition in math, it is the definition in English as well:

limit: something that bounds, restrains, or confines: the utmost extent

If you are limited, it means you can't do something. For example, I have the limit in that I can't fly.

Or at least I believe I have that limit.

But really, ever since the early 20th century, we can fly (likely long before, but I'm not going there right now). I have actually flown many times. I've even flown in planes, a helicopter and even a balloon. So what I may have believed to be a limit in the 17th century (for example) of "I can't fly", would have by the 20th century needed to be changed to, "I can't fly, unless it is in an airplane, helicopter, zeppelin, balloon, glider, rocket, etc."

So that's my limit. But what if someday someone invents anti-gravity boots, Star Trek (Spock) style? Then I would have to add "anti-grav boots" onto my list, and my "limits" have changed, proving that my limits were not what I believed them to be, once again. But what if someday I learn how to levitate with my mind? I'm not saying its possible, but what the fuck do I know? Then how would "I can't fly" have any meaning as a "limit"? It would turn out that everything I thought I knew about that limit was fraudulent; a belief I told myself (or someone else told me) that was either a lie, or a lack of understanding. It was, regardless, at every stage, a false belief; a false limit.

How animals behave, how the stars behave, how everything behaves is playing the same tune on a different instrument. It's all the exact same thing, but in a different frame of reference.

This is your belief of how the universe works. I don't disagree with it. I see those patterns as well, and seeing those patterns is very useful in the decision making process. The problem lies with believing that those patterns are Truth, instead of just patterns that are useful.

The Truth is what It Is. If you categorize it, and limit it, you are putting your beliefs into it. The Truth AKA That Which Is AKA God does not care about your beliefs of what is Real. Reality will go on just fine without your beliefs of what it is (which change in small to large ways every day). That doesn't mean your beliefs aren't influential on Reality; we are a fundamental part of it, but it is not reliant on it. It simply Is What It Is.

Not to beat yesterday's horse, but you deserve an answer, your rebuttals are always thoughtful.

What is your definition of "limitation"?

A limit is a boundary. It can't be crossed. By definition, a limit is impossible to get past. In math it bounds a function. A function can never cross a limit. This isn't just the definition in math, it is the definition in English as well:

limit: something that bounds, restrains, or confines: the utmost extent

If you are limited, it means you can't do something. For example, I have the limit in that I can't fly.

Or at least I believe I have that limit.

But really, ever since the early 20th century, we can fly (likely long before, but I'm not going there right now). I have actually flown many times. I've even flown in planes, a helicopter and even a balloon. So what I may have believed to be a limit in the 17th century (for example) of "I can't fly", would have by the 20th century needed to be changed to, "I can't fly, unless it is in an airplane, helicopter, zeppelin, balloon, glider, rocket, etc."

So that's my limit. But what if someday someone invents anti-gravity boots, Star Trek (Spock) style? Then I would have to add "anti-grav boots" onto my list, and my "limits" have changed, proving that my limits were not what I believed them to be, once again. But what if someday I learn how to levitate with my mind? I'm not saying its possible, but what the fuck do I know? Then how would "I can't fly" have any meaning as a "limit"? It would turn out that everything I thought I knew about that limit was fraudulent; a belief I told myself (or someone else told me) that was either a lie, or a lack of understanding. It was, regardless, at every stage, a false belief; a false limit.

How animals behave, how the stars behave, how everything behaves is playing the same tune on a different instrument. It's all the exact same thing, but in a different frame of reference.

This is your belief of how the universe works. I don't disagree with it. I see those patterns as well, and seeing those patterns is very useful in the decision making process. The problem lies with believing that those patterns are Truth, instead of just patterns that are useful.

The Truth is what It Is. If you categorize it, and limit it, you are putting your beliefs into it. The Truth AKA That Which Is AKA God does not care about your beliefs of what is Real. Reality will go on just fine without your belief (which changes from day to day). That doesn't mean your beliefs aren't influential on Reality; we are a fundamental part of it, but it is not reliant on it. It simply Is What It Is.

Not to beat yesterday's horse, but you deserve an answer, your rebuttals are always thoughtful.

What is your definition of "limitation"?

A limit is a boundary. It can't be crossed. By definition, a limit is impossible to get past. In math it bounds a function. A function can never cross a limit. This isn't just the definition in math, it is the definition in English as well:

limit: something that bounds, restrains, or confines: the utmost extent

If you are limited, it means you can't do something. For example, I have the limit in that I can't fly.

Or at least I believe I have that limit.

But really, ever since the early 20th century, we can fly (likely long before, but I'm not going there right now). I have actually flown many times. I've even flown in planes, a helicopter and even a balloon. So what I may have believed to be a limit in the 17th century (for example) of "I can't fly", would have by the 20th century needed to be changed to, "I can't fly, unless it is in an airplane, helicopter, zeppelin, balloon, glider, rocket, etc."

So that's my limit. But what if someday someone invents anti-gravity boots, Star Trek (Spock) style? Then I would have to add "anti-grav boots" onto my list, and my "limits" have changed, proving that my limits were not what I believed them to be, once again. But what if someday I learn how to levitate with my mind? I'm not saying its possible, but what the fuck do I know? Then how would "I can't fly" have any meaning as a "limit"? It would turn out that everything I thought I knew about that limit was fraudulent; a belief I told myself (or someone else told me) that was either a lie, or a lack of understanding. It was, regardless, at every stage, a false belief.

How animals behave, how the stars behave, how everything behaves is playing the same tune on a different instrument. It's all the exact same thing, but in a different frame of reference.

This is your belief of how the universe works. I don't disagree with it. I see those patterns as well, and seeing those patterns is very useful in the decision making process. The problem lies with believing that those patterns are Truth, instead of just patterns that are useful.

The Truth is what It Is. If you categorize it, and limit it, you are putting your beliefs into it. The Truth AKA That Which Is AKA God does not care about your beliefs of what is Real. Reality will go on just fine without your belief (which changes from day to day). That doesn't mean your beliefs aren't influential on Reality; we are a fundamental part of it, but it is not reliant on it. It simply Is What It Is.