Here something you overlooked. He was 18 and the kids that he was "dating" was 8 years old. He also ended up re offending a couple years later. He wasn't arrested for not responding to an undercover dummy. He actually did respond to an undercover and within 30minutes of meeting him was already talking about exchanging CP, some of which included middle school boys fucking. He uploaded 5 CP videos to YouTube all which included boys under 15, and then actively seeked to trade for more. Did you even read the email exchanges between him and the undercover? Why is everything about that case available EXCEPT the judges reasoning for giving him 3 months. That's sealed. Wonder why you overlooked that.

Here something you overlooked. He was 18 and the kids that he was "dating" was 8 years old. He also ended up re offending a couple years later. He wasn't arrested for not responding to an undercover dummy. He actually did respond to an undercover and within 30minutes of meeting him was already talking about exchanging CP, some of which included middle school boys fucking. Why is everything about that case available EXCEPT the judges reasoning for giving him 3 months. That's sealed. Wonder why you overlooked that.

Here something you overlooked. He was 18 and the kids that he was "dating" was 8 years old. He also ended up re offending a couple years later. He wasn't arrested for not responding to an undercover dummy. He actually did respond to an undercover and within 30minutes of meeting him was already talking about exchanging CP, some of which included middle school boys fucking.