I guess it was the part about comms that really threw me off, as it does with some of the Q stuff I see posted here. An article was posted on the 9th about a missile, then Epstein "dies" on the 10th, so they are on the 9th communicating to people that Epstein is dead or will die on the 10th, in the article's view. There is no information to identify Epstein. Vague and useless as a comm, but let's look at the next one.

Business Insider publishes an article on 6/15/20 saying that it was just discovered that a Russian nuclear accident had occured on 9/26/17 and went unreported and unnoticed for 3 years. So this article from 2020 is supposed to be a time travel comm to people 3 years earlier. Makes sense?

The more subtle implication here is that 90% of the time of all the deep state and blackmailer people is spent pouring through the news trying to decipher the most vague of coincidences to see if a fellow blackmailer had died. And they do this because, I guess, they have never heard of phones or digital communications, and are unable to figure out a way to actually encode meaningful information in their comms.

They publish an article about a diamond the size of a tennis ball. The article has ZERO nuclear connection but the author of this article thought "what the hell" and included it anyway. And you know for sure it's a comm because (as is underlined in the article, can't make this up) it says "The stone will tell us its story". Clearly a comm telling some designated person to clean up some blackmail. And where do they clean it up from? Well, the article is very clear about this. The stone is the size of a tennis ball and Jeffrey Epstein is (I guess?) the only blackmailer with a tennis court, so obviously they have to clean up... Heffner's estate? That does not add up.

I would have pointed this all out upfront but honestly the article is so fucking stupid that it demands for someone to at least come along and call it bullshit, but is not of sufficient quality to warrant a written analysis. But there's your enlightenment.

I guess it was the part about comms that really threw me off, as it does with some of the Q stuff I see posted here. An article was posted on the 9th about a missile, then Epstein "dies" on the 10th, so they are on the 9th communicating to people that some major event will occur on the 10th, in the article's view. Vague and useless as a comm, but let's look at the next one.

Business Insider publishes an article on 6/15/20 saying that it was just discovered that a Russian nuclear accident had occured on 9/26/17 and went unreported and unnoticed for 3 years. So this article from 2020 is supposed to be a time travel comm to people 3 years earlier.

The more subtle implication here is that 90% of the time of all the deep state and blackmailer people is spent pouring through the news trying to decipher the most vague of coincidences to see if a fellow blackmailer had died. And they do this because, I guess, they have never heard of phones or digital communications, and are unable to figure out a way to actually encode meaningful information in their comms.

They publish an article about a diamond the size of a tennis ball. The article has ZERO nuclear connection but the author of this article thought "what the hell" and included it anyway. And you know for sure it's a comm because (as is underlined in the article, can't make this up) it says "The stone will tell us its story". Clearly a comm telling some designated person to clean up some blackmail. And where do they clean it up from? Well, the article is very clear about this. The stone is the size of a tennis ball and Jeffrey Epstein is the only blackmailer with a tennis court, so obviously they have to clean up... Heffner's estate?

I would have pointed this all out upfront but honestly the article is so fucking stupid that it demands for someone to at least come along and call it bullshit, but is not of sufficient quality to warrant a written analysis. But there's your enlightenment.

I guess it was the part about comms that really threw me off, as it does with some of the Q stuff I see posted here. An article was posted on the 9th about a missile, then Epstein "dies" on the 10th, so they are on the 9th communicating to people that some major event will occur on the 10th, in the article's view. Vague and useless as a comm, but let's look at the next one.

Business Insider publishes an article on 6/15/20 saying that it was just discovered that a Russian nuclear accident had occured on 9/26/17 and went unreported and unnoticed for 3 years. So this article from 2020 is supposed to be a time travel comm to people 3 years earlier.

The more subtle implication here is that 90% of the time of all the deep state and blackmailer people is spent pouring through the news trying to decipher the most vague of coincidences to see if a fellow blackmailer had died. And they do this because, I guess, they have never heard of phones or digital communications, and are unable to figure out a way to actually encode meaningful information in their comms.

They publish an article about a diamond the size of a tennis ball. The article has ZERO nuclear connection but the author of this article thought "what the hell" and included it anyway. And you know for sure it's a comm because (as is underlined in the article, can't make this up) it says "The stone will tell us its story". Clearly a comm telling some designated person to clean up some blackmail. And where do they clean it up from? Well, the article is very clear about this. The stone is the size of a tennis ball and Jeffrey Epstein is the only blackmailer with a tennis court, so obviously they have to clean up... Heffner's estate?

I would have pointed this all out upfront but honestly the article is so fucking stupid that it demands for someone to at least come along and call it bullshit, but is not of sufficient quality to warrant a written analysis. But many people around here are not of sound mind and need help to wade through bullshit, so there it is.

I guess it was the part about comms that really threw me off, as it does with some of the Q stuff I see posted here. An article was posted on the 9th about a missile, then Epstein "dies" on the 10th, so they are on the 9th communicating to people that some major event will occur on the 10th, in the article's view. Vague and useless as a comm, but let's look at the next one.

Business Insider publishes an article on 6/15/20 saying that it was just discovered that a Russian nuclear accident had occured on 9/26/17 and went unreported and unnoticed for 3 years. So this article from 2020 is supposed to be a time travel comm to people 3 years earlier.

The more subtle implication here is that 90% of the time of all the deep state and blackmailer people is spent pouring through the news trying to decipher the most vague of coincidences to see if a fellow blackmailer had died. And they do this because, I guess, they have never heard of phones or digital communications, and are unable to figure out a way to actually encode meaningful information in their comms.

They publish an article about a diamond the size of a tennis ball. The article has ZERO nuclear connection but the author of this article thought "what the hell" and included it anyway. And you know for sure it's a comm because (as is underlined in the article, can't make this up) it says "The stone will tell us its story". Clearly a comm telling some designated person to clean up some blackmail. And where do they clean it up from? Well, the article is very clear about this. The stone is the size of a tennis ball and Jeffrey Epstein is the only blackmailer with a tennis court, so obviously they have to clean up... Heffner's estate?

I would have pointed this all out upfront but honestly the article is so fucking stupid that it demands for someone to at least come along and call it bullshit, but is not of sufficient quality to warrant a written analysis. But you clearly need help, so there it is.