ONE

I cannot find the video on Rumble. The embedded rumble video does not allow linking to Rumble (normally, clicking on RUMBLE in an embedded video lets you jump to the video Rumble's own site.)

Also, the video Title "Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Talks About Anthony Fauci and NIH" is not found on Rumble.

In addition, the Quote that Flynn's post quote is NOT found in the embedded video at all. So, where it is from?

If I didn't know better, I'd say Flynn's account had been hacked. Why? Because the article itself is also Bullshite. See below

TWO

This is a BS "news" article that has been circulating for at least 6 months. Sorry to disappoint, but it's nonsense.

A. Note there is NO date on the report. (Like I said, this has been circulating for at least 6 months, probably closer to 8)

B. The US Supreme Court does Not rule on vaccines. It adjudicates matters related to interpreting the constitution ONLY.

C. If B above isn't enough of a hint, there has never been any such "lawsuit" with the US supreme court.

I could list another 5 elements that SHOUT disinformation and clickbait bulldust, but that becomes tedious.

Troubling that this was posted by Flynn, who I admire greatly. Frankly, I find it really hard to understand why he would post this, why he would post a non-sourced quote, and why he would use a BS article in the first place.

THREE

Tracked the video back to AMG-News.com

This is clearly (in my view) a clickbait BS website, posting heaps of disinfo that takes advantage of truth seekers. Hard to know without further investigation WHY (see below). But They post videos on Rumble under the MedeeaGreere channel.

Looking at the website, seems exactly the same as many that take news and facts and mix it up with speculation, wild theories, and presents them as if facts.

Personally, I hate that stuff. That sort of thing almost does more damage to the Truth Movement than the Fake News propaganda.

FOUR

I encourage everyone to learn to recognize Bullshite or Disinfo when it appears. There are almost always significant telltale signs.

• Is the journalistic style overly dramatic and sensationalist?

• Are concrete and actual sources cited to underpin or verify the assertions?

• Does the content appeal to any confirmation bias that patriots or truth seekers might have? (We all have them to some extent)

• Does it actually make sense (e.g. the Supreme court ruling in the way this article describes is blatantly nonsense for anyone who knows anything about the Supreme Court

• If it sounds "too good to be true" (i.e. fulfill all your hopes and dreams and longed for results) then it probably IS too good to be true.

There are two large categories of disinfo and fake "truther" content:

one, from Cabal and evil sources that seek to muddy the Truth Sphere with disinfo, to, for example, mislead and have truthers repost and assert, so that when it is easily debunked, it sets a condition for others to disbelieve the truther in future cases. I.e. "Make them look stupid" tactic.

Another possible strategy is to deeply mislead, create division, by deep state plants into the patriotic or truth-seeking arena. If you don't think the Deep State is mobilizing operatives to undermine and infiltrate the Freedom and Truth movements, you're wrong.

two, from those who, while not specifically aligned with the Deep State or cabal, nonetheless serve their own selfish interests, and spread disinfo and fake info taking advantage of those who are seeking truth but are vulnerable or gullible.

In this category, largely two motives predominate: A. To swindle and abuse others, but leading them in to take advantage, either by getting subscribers, some sort of payment, or B. Shits and giggles - to troll others and get kicks by seeing just how far you can mislead and trick them.

Either way, do not be discouraged. Learning to think for ourselves, and learn and research for ourselves invariably involves making mistakes, getting tricked sometimes, and forwarding fake content because we just didn't take time to check or verify.

We've all done that at some time. But as one matures in one's capacity to digest and process information, and evaluate, it becomes easier to spot bullshite, and also to not react so easily without solid basis.

ONE

I cannot find the video on Rumble. The embedded rumble video does not allow linking to Rumble (normally, clicking on RUMBLE in an embedded video lets you jump to the video Rumble's own site.)

Also, the video Title "Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Talks About Anthony Fauci and NIH" is not found on Rumble.

In addition, the Quote that Flynn's post quote is NOT found in the embedded video at all. So, where it is from?

If I didn't know better, I'd say Flynn's account had been hacked. Why? Because the article itself is also Bullshite. See below

TWO

This is a BS "news" article that has been circulating for at least 6 months. Sorry to disappoint, but it's nonsense.

A. Note there is NO date on the report. (Like I said, this has been circulating for at least 6 months, probably closer to 8)

B. The US Supreme Court does Not rule on vaccines. It adjudicates matters related to interpreting the constitution ONLY.

C. If B above isn't enough of a hint, there has never been any such "lawsuit" with the US supreme court.

I could list another 5 elements that SHOUT disinformation and clickbait bulldust, but that becomes tedious.

Troubling that this was posted by Flynn, who I admire greatly. Frankly, I find it really hard to understand why he would post this, why he would post a non-sourced quote, and why he would use a BS article in the first place.

THREE

I encourage everyone to learn to recognize Bullshite or Disinfo when it appears. There are almost always significant telltale signs.

• Is the journalistic style overly dramatic and sensationalist?

• Are concrete and actual sources cited to underpin or verify the assertions?

• Does the content appeal to any confirmation bias that patriots or truth seekers might have? (We all have them to some extent)

• Does it actually make sense (e.g. the Supreme court ruling in the way this article describes is blatantly nonsense for anyone who knows anything about the Supreme Court

• If it sounds "too good to be true" (i.e. fulfill all your hopes and dreams and longed for results) then it probably IS too good to be true.

There are two large categories of disinfo and fake "truther" content:

one, from Cabal and evil sources that seek to muddy the Truth Sphere with disinfo, to, for example, mislead and have truthers repost and assert, so that when it is easily debunked, it sets a condition for others to disbelieve the truther in future cases. I.e. "Make them look stupid" tactic.

Another possible strategy is to deeply mislead, create division, by deep state plants into the patriotic or truth-seeking arena. If you don't think the Deep State is mobilizing operatives to undermine and infiltrate the Freedom and Truth movements, you're wrong.

two, from those who, while not specifically aligned with the Deep State or cabal, nonetheless serve their own selfish interests, and spread disinfo and fake info taking advantage of those who are seeking truth but are vulnerable or gullible.

In this category, largely two motives predominate: A. To swindle and abuse others, but leading them in to take advantage, either by getting subscribers, some sort of payment, or B. Shits and giggles - to troll others and get kicks by seeing just how far you can mislead and trick them.

Either way, do not be discouraged. Learning to think for ourselves, and learn and research for ourselves invariably involves making mistakes, getting tricked sometimes, and forwarding fake content because we just didn't take time to check or verify.

We've all done that at some time. But as one matures in one's capacity to digest and process information, and evaluate, it becomes easier to spot bullshite, and also to not react so easily without solid basis.

ONE

I cannot find the video on Rumble. The embedded rumble video does not allow linking to Rumble (normally, clicking on RUMBLE in an embedded video lets you jump to the video Rumble's own site.)

Also, the video Title "Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Talks About Anthony Fauci and NIH" is not found on Rumble.

In addition, the Quote that Flynn's post quote is NOT found in the embedded video at all. So, where it is from?

If I didn't know better, I'd say Flynn's account had been hacked. This stuff is BS.

See below

TWO

This is a BS "news" article that has been circulating for at least 6 months. Sorry to disappoint, but it's nonsense.

A. Note there is NO date on the report. (Like I said, this has been circulating for at least 6 months, probably closer to 8)

B. The US Supreme Court does Not rule on vaccines. It adjudicates matters related to interpreting the constitution ONLY.

C. If B above isn't enough of a hint, there has never been any such "lawsuit" with the US supreme court.

I could list another 5 elements that SHOUT disinformation and clickbait bulldust, but that becomes tedious.

I would encourage the OP to learn to recognize Bullshite or Disinfo when it appears. There are almost always significant telltale signs.

• Is the journalistic style overly dramatic and sensationalist?

• Are concrete and actual sources cited to underpin or verify the assertions?

• Does the content appeal to any confirmation bias that patriots or truth seekers might have? (We all have them to some extent)

• Does it actually make sense (e.g. the Supreme court ruling in the way this article describes is blatantly nonsense for anyone who knows anything about the Supreme Court

• If it sounds "too good to be true" (i.e. fulfill all your hopes and dreams and longed for results) then it probably IS too good to be true.

There are two large categories of disinfo and fake "truther" content:

one, from Cabal and evil sources that seek to muddy the Truth Sphere with disinfo, to, for example, mislead and have truthers repost and assert, so that when it is easily debunked, it sets a condition for others to disbelieve the truther in future cases. I.e. "Make them look stupid" tactic.

Another possible strategy is to deeply mislead, create division, by deep state plants into the patriotic or truth-seeking arena. If you don't think the Deep State is mobilizing operatives to undermine and infiltrate the Freedom and Truth movements, you're wrong.

two, from those who, while not specifically aligned with the Deep State or cabal, nonetheless serve their own selfish interests, and spread disinfo and fake info taking advantage of those who are seeking truth but are vulnerable or gullible.

In this category, largely two motives predominate: A. To swindle and abuse others, but leading them in to take advantage, either by getting subscribers, some sort of payment, or B. Shits and giggles - to troll others and get kicks by seeing just how far you can mislead and trick them.

Either way, do not be discouraged. Learning to think for ourselves, and learn and research for ourselves invariably involves making mistakes, getting tricked sometimes, and forwarding fake content because we just didn't take time to check or verify.

We've all done that at some time. But as one matures in one's capacity to digest and process information, and evaluate, it becomes easier to spot bullshite, and also to not react so easily without solid basis.

This is a BS "news" article that has been circulating for at least 6 months. Sorry to disappoint, but it's nonsense.

A. Note there is NO date on the report. (Like I said, this has been circulating for at least 6 months, probably closer to 8)

B. The US Supreme Court does Not rule on vaccines. It adjudicates matters related to interpreting the constitution ONLY.

C. If B above isn't enough of a hint, there has never been any such "lawsuit" with the US supreme court.

I could list another 5 elements that SHOUT disinformation and clickbait bulldust, but that becomes tedious.

I would encourage the OP to learn to recognize Bullshite or Disinfo when it appears. There are almost always significant telltale signs.

• Is the journalistic style overly dramatic and sensationalist?

• Are concrete and actual sources cited to underpin or verify the assertions?

• Does the content appeal to any confirmation bias that patriots or truth seekers might have? (We all have them to some extent)

• Does it actually make sense (e.g. the Supreme court ruling in the way this article describes is blatantly nonsense for anyone who knows anything about the Supreme Court

• If it sounds "too good to be true" (i.e. fulfill all your hopes and dreams and longed for results) then it probably IS too good to be true.

There are two large categories of disinfo and fake "truther" content:

one, from Cabal and evil sources that seek to muddy the Truth Sphere with disinfo, to, for example, mislead and have truthers repost and assert, so that when it is easily debunked, it sets a condition for others to disbelieve the truther in future cases. I.e. "Make them look stupid" tactic.

Another possible strategy is to deeply mislead, create division, by deep state plants into the patriotic or truth-seeking arena. If you don't think the Deep State is mobilizing operatives to undermine and infiltrate the Freedom and Truth movements, you're wrong.

two, from those who, while not specifically aligned with the Deep State or cabal, nonetheless serve their own selfish interests, and spread disinfo and fake info taking advantage of those who are seeking truth but are vulnerable or gullible.

In this category, largely two motives predominate: A. To swindle and abuse others, but leading them in to take advantage, either by getting subscribers, some sort of payment, or B. Shits and giggles - to troll others and get kicks by seeing just how far you can mislead and trick them.

Either way, do not be discouraged. Learning to think for ourselves, and learn and research for ourselves invariably involves making mistakes, getting tricked sometimes, and forwarding fake content because we just didn't take time to check or verify.

We've all done that at some time. But as one matures in one's capacity to digest and process information, and evaluate, it becomes easier to spot bullshite, and also to not react so easily without solid basis.