Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

First of all, it never was « The Jews ».

« Some Jews » might be more adequately phrased.

It would be really antisemitic (funny how iOS autocorrect does not know that very word) to think all the Jews are either good or bad.

The most I could suggest is that as their communities (note the plural) often are better at gathering and nurturing than most urban communities, it’s easier for the undecided to follow an influencing fellow than a bland local decisioner Goyim. This statement only criticizes an eventuality evil-willed influencer (which happen to exist as personal profits do exist).

Now, let’s make a daring hypothesis:

There’s a « 100% Jewish kabbal » (consisting of Jews only, but not of ALL of them) and also that Trump has hired a majority of Jews as you suggest: then who tells us these are not « white knights » working against the « dark ones » (not skin but intent related, of course)…?

Yes, that’d be over optimistic, but then the hypothesis is over pessimistic so there has to be a balance to be found somewhere: some Jews good, some others bad, good mix with good Goyims, bad also mix with bad Goyims… let people believe what they can picture but keep the Constitution over whatever their supremacist goals would be so they never take over We The People.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

First of all, it never was « The Jews ».

« Some Jews » might be more adequately phrased.

It would be really antisemitic (funny how iOS autocorrect does not know that very word) to think all the Jews are either good or bad.

The most I could suggest is that as their communities (note the plural) often are better an gathering and nurturing than most urban communities, it’s easier for the undecided to follow an influencing fellow than a bland local decisioner Goyim, which only criticizes an eventuality evil-willed influencer (which happen to exist as personal profits do exist).

Now, let’s make a daring hypothesis:

There’s a « 100% Jewish kabbal » (consisting of Jews only, but not of ALL of them) and also that Trump has hired a majority of Jews as you suggest: then who tells us these are not « white knights » working against the « dark ones » (not skin but intent related, of course)…

Yes, that’d be over optimistic, but then the hypothesis is over pessimistic so there has to be a balance to be found somewhere: some Jews good, some others bad, good mix with good Goyims, bad also mix with bad Goyims… let people believe what they can but keep the Constitution over whatever their supremacist goals would be so they never take over We The People.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

First of all, it never was « The Jews ».

« Some Jews » might be more adequately phrased.

It would be really antisemitic (funny how iOS autocorrect does not know that very word) to think all the Jews are either good or bad.

The most I could suggest is that as their communities (not the plural) often are better an gathering and nurturing than most urban communities, it’s easier for the undecided to follow an influencing fellow than a bland local decisioner Goyim, which only criticizes an eventuality evil-willed influencer (which happen to exist as personal profits do exist).

Now, let’s make a daring hypothesis:

There’s a « 100% Jewish kabbal » (consisting of Jews only, but not of ALL of them) and also that Trump has hired a majority of Jews as you suggest: then who tells us these are not « white knights » working against the « dark ones » (not skin but intent related, of course)…

Yes, that’d be over optimistic, but then the hypothesis is over pessimistic so there has to be a balance to be found somewhere: some Jews good, some others bad, good mix with good Goyims, bad also mix with bad Goyims… let people believe what they can but keep the Constitution over whatever their supremacist goals would be so they never take over We The People.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

First of all, it never was « The Jews ».

« Some Jews » might be more adequately phrased.

It would be really antisemitic (funny how iOS autocorrect does not know that very word) to think all the Jews are either good or bad.

Now, let’s make a daring hypothesis:

There’s a « 100% Jewish kabbal » (consisting of Jews only, but not of ALL of them) and also that Trump has hired a majority of Jews as you suggest: then who tells us these are not « white knights » working against the « dark ones » (not skin but intent related, of course)…

Yes, that’d be over optimistic, but then the hypothesis is over pessimistic so there has to be a balance to be found somewhere: some Jews good, some others bad, good mix with good Goyims, bad also mix with bad Goyims… let people believe what they can but keep the Constitution over whatever their supremacist goals would be so they never take over We The People.

2 years ago
1 score