I like the cut of your cloth, fren. You seem to possess an intensity that St Paul would be proud of. I'm going to look up what you've mentioned.

EDIT: Need to confirm Saint Simon of Trent because that is a serious redpill if true. Interesting quotes by two of my favorites saints, Thomas Aquinas and Augustine. Why have I not heard those before. Seems kind of important.

Wikipedia and most media claim it was all blood libel the child was murdered and to frame the Jews. OK......

Yet it is after Vatican II that St. Simon became unvenerated in 1965. Yet assuming beautification, there must have been a Devi'ls advocate? Or do martyrs not need a Devil's advocate?

The timing does seem real suspicions. We know Vatican II is the tool of the evil one. We judge the by their fruits. And it is right on the heels of that POS that a new history was magically discovered in which the little boy who was 100% murdered, was not murdered by the people everyone claimed murdered them at the time.

Why did his parents want the wrong people prosecuted? Did the parents do it? It possible. But it is always more possible when parents are liberal.

And who cares? Why was it so important to rewrite THIS history. Something something protesting too much.

In re: Holy Child of La Guardia. Interesting how dailybeast and a bunch of leftist sites all agree there was no body. That the murder was invented out of whole cloth. So how we was made an martyr?

In re: William of Norwich. They admit he was murdered. Yet admit there was not enough evidence to convict so they were acquitted. So it appears as if Catholics actually don't robo convict Jews. Seems like when a Christian juries convict they do it with thought.

I like the cut of your cloth, fren. You seem to possess an intensity that St Paul would be proud of. I'm going to look up what you've mentioned.

EDIT: Need to confirm Saint Simon of Trent because that is a serious redpill if true. Interesting quotes by two of my favorites saints, Thomas Aquinas and Augustine. Why have I not heard those before. Seems kind of important.

Wikipedia and most media claim it was all blood libel the child was murdered and to frame the Jews. OK......

Yet it is after Vatican II that St. Simon became unvenerated in 1965. Yet assuming beautification, there must have been a Devi'ls advocate? Or do martyrs not need a Devil's advocate?

The timing does seem real suspicions. We know Vatican II is the tool of the evil one. We judge the by their fruits. And it is right on the heels of that POS that a new history was magically discovered in which the little boy who was 100% murdered, was not murdered by the people everyone claimed murdered them at the time.

Why did his parents want the wrong people prosecuted? Did the parents do it? It possible. But it is always more possible when parents are liberal.

And who cares? Why was it so important to rewrite THIS history. Something something protesting too much.

In re: Holy Child of La Guardia. Interesting how dailybeast and a bunch of leftist sites all agree there was no body. That the murder was invented out of whole cloth. So how we was made an martyr?

In re: William of Norwich. They admit he was murdered. Yet admit there was not enough evidence to convict so they were acquitted. So it appears as if Catholics actually don't robo convict Jews. Seems like when a Christian juries convict the do it with thought.

I like the cut of your cloth, fren. You seem to possess an intensity that St Paul would be proud of. I'm going to look up what you've mentioned.

EDIT: Need to confirm Saint Simon of Trent because that is a serious redpill if true. Interesting quotes by two of my favorites saints, Thomas Aquinas and Augustine. Why have I not heard those before. Seems kind of important.

Wikipedia and most media claim it was all blood libel the child was murdered and to frame the Jews. OK......

Yet it is after Vatican II that St. Simon became unvenerated in 1965. Yet assuming beautification, there must have been a Devi'ls advocate? Or do martyrs not need a Devil's advocate?

The timing does seem real suspicions. We know Vatican II is the tool of the evil one. We judge the by their fruits. And it is right on the heels of that POS that a new history was magically discovered in which the little boy who was 100% murdered, was not murdered by the people everyone claimed murdered them at the time.

Why did his parents want the wrong people prosecuted? Did the parents do it? It possible. But it is always more possible when parents are liberal.

And who cares? Why was it so important to rewrite THIS history. Something something protesting too much.

I like the cut of your cloth, fren. You seem to possess an intensity that St Paul would be proud of. I'm going to look up what you've mentioned.

EDIT: Need to confirm Saint Simon of Trent because that is a serious redpill if true. Interesting quotes by two of my favorites saints, Thomas Aquinas and Augustine. Why have I not heard those before. Seems kind of important.

I like the cut of your cloth, fren. You seem to possess an intensity that St Paul would be proud of. I'm going to look up what you've mentioned.