Let's consider an inconvenient truth about Alexia, gold, bitcoin, NESARA/GESARA, etc.
If the Cabal are willingly admitting that something is going to happen, it's because they're the ones behind it.
I've seen more ads for gold/silver and even bitcoin management services than ever before...
If we were going to a gold-backed dollar in the next year or two, then there is no way in hell they'd be selling gold and accepting the failing fiat currency.
Same goes for bitcoin.
If they were smart, they'd hold on to the precious commodities like their lives depended on it, because it does.
The only way out of their corrupt system is a total collapse, where NO ONE can get the upper hand ahead of time by investing within the failed system -- not even honest people.
We aren't dealing with a tumor you can simply excise and expect the rest of the body to survive. We are dealing with a full-body blood cancer that exists in every part of the body.
When a tree is falling apart and decaying from the inside out, is it wise to try and cut saplings from it?
If the sapling is tainted, it too will rot in time. You won't know until you've invested too much time and effort in trying to rear the replacement.
The only sure way forward is starting fresh, using nothing but the prior timber for fertilizer after its ashes have burned with the fire of a thousand suns, so that not a trace of the foul black corruption persists.
This isn't discounting gold, other precious metals, or crypto's ability to rise from the ashes, but it is clarifying that there must be supple ashes in order to rise again.
Which means, unless you have the physical metal in hand, the crypto on a hard disk, or a pile of tools with which you can craft and barter, you have nothing but rough toilet paper (fiat cash dollars) and ones and zeroes on an easily disposable network system owned and fully controlled by the ones you're hedging against to begin with (bank account).
In summary, if Alexa is even beginning to hint at a new gold-backed currency, you can bet your left ass cheek that it's funny-money.
"Rainbow" dollars?
In today's political climate, calling it that is suicide. Conservatives would immediately be suspicious as soon as the Disney's jump on board, and it would sink like a lead turd. It smells like a liberal think tank came up with the name, so it probably was the case.
At any rate, I'd be happy to be wrong on this, but it definitely looks like we are going to go through a rough period that forces people to come up and trial their own monetary systems, for the express purpose of letting the human race by-and-large come to terms with how money actually works.
Money is a physical representation of Time.
In Barter, I take time to make something, and you take time to make something. We trade our somethings, which means we trade one person's time for another person's time. The purpose of such a system revolves around each person's time to make the other's something.
Consider:
You can produce 1 wooden crate in 2 hours whereas it takes me 3 hours.
It takes me 3 hours to produce 1 crate's worth of strawberries, whereas it takes you 6 hours.
Q: How much is a wooden crate worth in strawberries?
A:
-
If I produce 2 crates of strawberries, it will be cost 6 hours of MY labor. In comparison, it would cost you 12 hours to do the same.
-
If you produce 3 wooden crates, it will cost you 6 hours of YOUR labor. In comparison, it would cost me 9 hours to do the same.
-
By trading 2 crates of strawberries for 3 wooden crates, we have successfully exchanged 6 hours of labor for 6 hours of labor, if we stick to our given crafts.
-
However, if we did each-other's work, one person will spend 12 hours of labor for the other's 9 hours of labor.
-
Which means, if I, a strawberry producer, were to make crates I would be trading at a loss, where I could be saving 3 hours worth of time over you, 6 in total if doing what I do better, and then simply trading you strawberries for the crates I need.
-
You, on the other hand, by trading 9 hours of labor for my 12 hours will technically be in better shape, but this is an illusion. While you are better off than I am if we were to trade professions, you are still 3 hours behind where you could be.
These are the merits of a barter system -- those that work most efficiently can subsist only needing to do what they do best. No one is left performing roles that leave them in a time deficit.
Now, this is fine if strawberries weren't perishable, but since they are perishable, every second that passes where strawberries are still in my keeping is time burning away from my ability to trade.
There must be a way to solve this perishability issue, where you can stop time and store it in ways you cannot stop strawberries from perishing.
Enter currency.
Currency is borrowed time. You are storing a time where you have a strawberry crate ready to go, with minimal loss from perishability, and offering it for trade instead / in-its-stead.
Since the crate producer has little to no perishability in his product, he is the only one that can potentially be disadvantaged from this arrangement. However, because his product is non-perishable, it is also the wise course of action to value the new currency in crates, and so advantageous to the crate producer should he work to define the rule of the currency. You also absolutely need crates in order to store the strawberries, meaning crates are essential to trade.
So, let's have 100 quatloos be worth 1 wooden crate.
Which means a crate of strawberries, not including the crate itself, is worth 150 quatloos.
Strawberries, crate and all, is 250 quatloos.
If 400 wooden crates exist total, then we have a total of 40,000 quatloos we must print to such that each crate is worth 100 quatloos.
If only 300 crates of strawberries are expected to be harvested in a year, a GDP of 45,000 quatloos total, it means we know the strawberry market is doing well. If we produce less than 266 crates of strawberries, we know that the strawberry market is doing poorly, as the value of strawberries will be under that of the crate they rely upon for trade (266*150=39,900 , 39,900/40,000 = 99.75% of expected value).
Because quatloos are backed by the crates, we can easily predict from here what will occur should the strawberry shortage continue. There is no need to panic, because we didn't tie our dollar to something wildly perishable.
If, instead, you back the quatloo by strawberries, all hell breaks loose. A season where only 266 crates of strawberries are produced changes the value of the quatloo, which isn't immediately reflected in the value of the wooden crates.
In the reverse, where we still have a 34 crate loss over last year occurs, it means the value of 150 quatloos per standard harvest of 300 crates (45,000 quatloos) has shifted to 39,900 quatoos worth of strawberries while we have 45,000 quatloos still in circulation.
That's a sudden loss of 11% the value of the quatloo, since it is backed by strawberries. In short, we have more quatloos than strawberries backing it.
How do we make up the discrepancy?
Well, you'd have to take some quatloos out of circulation. Then the price adjusts itself.
But... What if you don't take quatloos out of circulation? Inflation.
Or, even worse, you print more quatloos when we have a bad year? Hyper-Inflation.
Well, holy crap, you've just invented the Central Banking Service.
This is how they've set up fiat with oil to make the petro-dollar. It's designed to screw over the economy to the benefit of those in charge.
We need a gold-backed dollar, just like it's preferable in the above analogy to back with wooden crates and not strawberries.
Is a "Rainbow Dollar" the way to do that?
Not if you plan on having people understand it all starts with value of time, not value of commodities. Did you forget about that?
Yeah, that's the problem. We get so tied up with currency we forget it isn't the commodity backing the currency we are really valuing, it's the time taken to acquire that commodity.
If you lost track of the Time is Money principle in my long-winded diatribe, then congratulations, you've just proven me right -- that the only way forward is a total system collapse. Not a bastard child built on the corpse of a bastardized system.
We need to go scorched earth.
I wrote this in a post of its own: https://greatawakening.win/p/15HIchGA6c/economy-lesson-time-is-money-mon/
Just in case you want to discuss it there.
Let's consider an inconvenient truth about Alexia, gold, bitcoin, NESARA/GESARA, etc.
If the Cabal are willingly admitting that something is going to happen, it's because they're the ones behind it.
I've seen more ads for gold/silver and even bitcoin management services than ever before...
If we were going to a gold-backed dollar in the next year or two, then there is no way in hell they'd be selling gold and accepting the failing fiat currency.
Same goes for bitcoin.
If they were smart, they'd hold on to the precious commodities like their lives depended on it, because it does.
The only way out of their corrupt system is a total collapse, where NO ONE can get the upper hand ahead of time by investing within the failed system -- not even honest people.
We aren't dealing with a tumor you can simply excise and expect the rest of the body to survive. We are dealing with a full-body blood cancer that exists in every part of the body.
When a tree is falling apart and decaying from the inside out, is it wise to try and cut saplings from it?
If the sapling is tainted, it too will rot in time. You won't know until you've invested too much time and effort in trying to rear the replacement.
The only sure way forward is starting fresh, using nothing but the prior timber for fertilizer after its ashes have burned with the fire of a thousand suns, so that not a trace of the foul black corruption persists.
This isn't discounting gold, other precious metals, or crypto's ability to rise from the ashes, but it is clarifying that there must be supple ashes in order to rise again.
Which means, unless you have the physical metal in hand, the crypto on a hard disk, or a pile of tools with which you can craft and barter, you have nothing but rough toilet paper (fiat cash dollars) and ones and zeroes on an easily disposable network system owned and fully controlled by the ones you're hedging against to begin with (bank account).
In summary, if Alexa is even beginning to hint at a new gold-backed currency, you can bet your left ass cheek that it's funny-money.
"Rainbow" dollars?
In today's political climate, calling it that is suicide. Conservatives would immediately be suspicious as soon as the Disney's jump on board, and it would sink like a lead turd. It smells like a liberal think tank came up with the name, so it probably was the case.
At any rate, I'd be happy to be wrong on this, but it definitely looks like we are going to go through a rough period that forces people to come up and trial their own monetary systems, for the express purpose of letting the human race by-and-large come to terms with how money actually works.
Money is a physical representation of Time.
In Barter, I take time to make something, and you take time to make something. We trade our somethings, which means we trade one person's time for another person's time. The purpose of such a system revolves around each person's time to make the other's something.
Consider:
You can produce 1 wooden crate in 2 hours whereas it takes me 3 hours.
It takes me 3 hours to produce 1 crate's worth of strawberries, whereas it takes you 6 hours.
Q: How much is a wooden crate worth in strawberries?
A:
-
If I produce 2 crates of strawberries, it will be cost 6 hours of MY labor. In comparison, it would cost you 12 hours to do the same.
-
If you produce 3 wooden crates, it will cost you 6 hours of YOUR labor. In comparison, it would cost me 9 hours to do the same.
-
By trading 2 crates of strawberries for 3 wooden crates, we have successfully exchanged 6 hours of labor for 6 hours of labor, if we stick to our given crafts.
-
However, if we did each-other's work, one person will spend 12 hours of labor for the other's 9 hours of labor.
-
Which means, if I, a strawberry producer, were to make crates I would be trading at a loss, where I could be saving 3 hours worth of time over you, 6 in total if doing what I do better, and then simply trading you strawberries for the crates I need.
-
You, on the other hand, by trading 9 hours of labor for my 12 hours will technically be in better shape, but this is an illusion. While you are better off than I am if we were to trade professions, you are still 3 hours behind where you could be.
These are the merits of a barter system -- those that work most efficiently can subsist only needing to do what they do best. No one is left performing roles that leave them in a time deficit.
Now, this is fine if strawberries weren't perishable, but since they are perishable, every second that passes where strawberries are still in my keeping is time burning away from my ability to trade.
There must be a way to solve this perishability issue, where you can stop time and store it in ways you cannot stop strawberries from perishing.
Enter currency.
Currency is borrowed time. You are storing a time where you have a strawberry crate ready to go, with minimal loss from perishability, and offering it for trade instead / in-its-stead.
Since the crate producer has little to no perishability in his product, he is the only one that can potentially be disadvantaged from this arrangement. However, because his product is non-perishable, it is also the wise course of action to value the new currency in crates, and so advantageous to the crate producer should he work to define the rule of the currency. You also absolutely need crates in order to store the strawberries, meaning crates are essential to trade.
So, let's have 100 quatloos be worth 1 wooden crate.
Which means a crate of strawberries, not including the crate itself, is worth 150 quatloos.
Strawberries, crate and all, is 250 quatloos.
If 400 wooden crates exist total, then we have a total of 40,000 quatloos we must print to such that each crate is worth 100 quatloos.
If only 300 crates of strawberries are expected to be harvested in a year, a GDP of 45,000 quatloos total, it means we know the strawberry market is doing well. If we produce less than 266 crates of strawberries, we know that the strawberry market is doing poorly, as the value of strawberries will be under that of the crate they rely upon for trade (266*150=39,900 , 39,900/40,000 = 99.75% of expected value).
Because quatloos are backed by the crates, we can easily predict from here what will occur should the strawberry shortage continue. There is no need to panic, because we didn't tie our dollar to something wildly perishable.
If, instead, you back the quatloo by strawberries, all hell breaks loose. A season where only 266 crates of strawberries are produced changes the value of the quatloo, which isn't immediately reflected in the value of the wooden crates.
In the reverse, where we still have a 34 crate loss over last year occurs, it means the value of 150 quatloos per standard harvest of 300 crates (45,000 quatloos) has shifted to 39,900 quatoos worth of strawberries while we have 45,000 quatloos still in circulation.
That's a sudden loss of 11% the value of the quatloo, since it is backed by strawberries. In short, we have more quatloos than strawberries backing it.
How do we make up the discrepancy?
Well, you'd have to take some quatloos out of circulation. Then the price adjusts itself.
But... What if you don't take quatloos out of circulation? Inflation.
Or, even worse, you print more quatloos when we have a bad year? Hyper-Inflation.
Well, holy crap, you've just invented the Central Banking Service.
This is how they've set up fiat with oil to make the petro-dollar. It's designed to screw over the economy to the benefit of those in charge.
We need a gold-backed dollar, just like it's preferable in the above analogy to back with wooden crates and not strawberries.
Is a "Rainbow Dollar" the way to do that?
Not if you plan on having people understand it all starts with value of time, not value of commodities. Did you forget about that?
Yeah, that's the problem. We get so tied up with currency we forget it isn't the commodity backing the currency we are really valuing, it's the time taken to acquire that commodity.
If you lost track of the Time is Money principle in my long-winded diatribe, then congratulations, you've just proven me right -- that the only way forward is a total system collapse. Not a bastard child built on the corpse of a bastardized system.
We need to go scorched earth.