Just like every Q "proof"/coincidence you can view it any of a thousand different ways, depending which views you're trying to support and which ones you're trying to downplay. There's enough facts out there that if you pick the right ones and arrange them the right way you can justify almost any point of view. Some of the dubious Q proofs I've seen around here simply ignore everything that was already known to produce a brand new conclusion that is in fact not supported by the years of evidence people have already accumulated. People build up an enormous tower of facts and then tear it down in an instant because of the vaguest, stupidest coincidence.

For example, Trump and his team and countless news reports and such convinced us that the virus came from a lab in Wuhan, China. In fact this was proven by multiple sources and more information about this is STILL coming out. But when everyone was focused on Ukraine and praising Putin as their new leader, someone noticed a Q post mentioning "Chyna". That spelling refers to numerous things in the world and in pop culture, but there was a city that had "Chy-na" in its freakishly-long name that was near (but clearly did not encompass) one of the reported biolabs.

One Qtard drew the connect and instantly built up a viral post saying the virus is now not a Chinese virus but a Ukrainian virus. Suddenly, if you posted about the Chinese virus that was factually Chinese that we all were digesting information about for a year, you were the idiot and got people asking why you so stupidly referred to the virus as "Chinese" when it was obviously from Ukraine.

So people spent a year learning all about Wuhan, but the second someone posted the vaguest (not even a) coincidence showing that there is a town with a similar name near a Ukrainian biolab (note that there is no lab in Chy-na, but plenty of them in CHINA), and instantly people totally discarded all of their accumulated knowledge.

It seems like the more tenuous the connection is, the more people are likely to believe it. There was a lab in Wuhan, we have countless records showing that the virus originated there, and all sources that are "on our side" said the same, including Trump. But some guy founds this one little thing vaguely tying a couple words in a Q post to the name of a city in Ukraine, and the entire community just "changes their mind". Do you think Q wanted to fool you into thinking it was China, then later have you think it was Ukraine?

Sorry, just a rant here, not really directed at you.

Just like every Q "proof"/coincidence you can view it any of a thousand different ways, depending which views you're trying to support and which ones you're trying to downplay. There's enough facts out there that if you pick the right ones and arrange them the right way you can justify almost any point of view. Some of the dubious Q proofs I've seen around here simply ignore everything that was already known to produce a brand new conclusion that is in fact not supported by the years of evidence people have already accumulated. People build up an enormous tower of facts and then tear it down in an instant because of the vaguest, stupidest coincidence.

For example, Trump and his team and countless news reports and such convinced us that the virus came from a lab in Wuhan, China. In fact this was proven by multiple sources and more information about this is STILL coming out. But when everyone was focused on Ukraine and praising Putin as their new leader, someone noticed a Q post mentioning "Chyna". That spelling refers to numerous things in the world and in pop culture, but there was a city called "Chy-na" that was near (but clearly did not encompass) one of the reported biolabs.

One Qtard drew the connect and instantly built up a viral post saying the virus is now not a Chinese virus but a Ukrainian virus. Suddenly, if you posted about the Chinese virus that was factually Chinese that we all were digesting information about for a year, you were the idiot and got people asking why you so stupidly referred to the virus as "Chinese" when it was obviously from Ukraine.

So people spent a year learning all about Wuhan, but the second someone posted the vaguest (not even a) coincidence showing that there is a town with a similar name near a Ukrainian biolab (note that there is no lab in Chy-na, but plenty of them in CHINA), and instantly people totally discarded all of their accumulated knowledge.

It seems like the more tenuous the connection is, the more people are likely to believe it. There was a lab in Wuhan, we have countless records showing that the virus originated there, and all sources that are "on our side" said the same, including Trump. But some guy founds this one little thing vaguely tying a couple words in a Q post to the name of a city in Ukraine, and the entire community just "changes their mind". Do you think Q wanted you to think it was China, then later think it was Ukraine?

Sorry, just a rant here, not really directed at you.