I don't know what to think of all this---I really like Ardis' work on Remdesivir, but this snake venom situation seems out-of-character and overly dramatic. It's taking all the air out of the room. A few thing strange things have been happening around Dr. Ardis lately:

1. Dr. Zelenko announced that he and Ardis are at the top of the Pharma assasination list on March 24th.

https://rumble.com/vydtrf-dr.-zev-zelenko-warns-the-world-about-big-pharmas-assassination-list.html

2. Ardis does a somewhat cryptic interview with Attorney Tom Renz on March 31st, indicating that Renz is representing him professionally in relation to the upcoming "bombshell" information he will be releasing. He also suggests that Pfizer has been following & hacking his computer since mid-December (at 9:30):

https://www.bitchute.com/video/zuaxvh3cKS5M/

3. Steve Kirsch (in his substack) offered to have Ardis "fact-checked" by a "friendly, but critical" group of experts before he went public. Ardis agreed, then refused, and released it to Stew Peters and Mike Adams at Brighteon (who dramatized the information more than needed.)

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/what-i-think-of-the-bryan-ardis-video?s=r

Wouldn't be the first time we've been divided by something new and splashy.

I don't know what to think of all this---I really like Ardis' work on Remdesivir, but this snake venom situation seems out-of-character and overly dramatic. A few thing strange things have been happening around Dr. Ardis lately:

1. Dr. Zelenko announced that he and Ardis are at the top of the Pharma assasination list on March 24th.

https://rumble.com/vydtrf-dr.-zev-zelenko-warns-the-world-about-big-pharmas-assassination-list.html

2. Ardis does a somewhat cryptic interview with Attorney Tom Renz on March 31st, indicating that Renz is representing him professionally in relation to the upcoming "bombshell" information he will be releasing. He also suggests that Pfizer has been following & hacking his computer since mid-December (at 9:30):

https://www.bitchute.com/video/zuaxvh3cKS5M/

3. Steve Kirsch (in his substack) offered to have Ardis "fact-checked" by a "friendly, but critical" group of experts before he went public. Ardis agreed, then refused, and released it to Stew Peters and Mike Adams at Brighteon (who dramatized the information more than needed.)

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/what-i-think-of-the-bryan-ardis-video?s=r

Wouldn't be the first time we've been divided by something new and splashy.