Actually there's zero evidence of all you state. For starters, there is no such thing as the "immune system". The medical mafia made it up in 1971 which was its first appearance in any medical textbook. Everything you find in anatomy and physiology textbooks today is pure nonsense, lacking even a modicum of proof. It's literally all scare propaganda, like so much else being offered to us by the controlling forces.

It's like you think we are all idiots (those of us who work in biology and do experiments). Look, there are lies galore in both biology and medicine. There is no doubt about that. My education was full of dogma. I knew it at the time. However, the best lies are based on the truth, especially in a field where everything is experimentally based. A science education is experiment driven. You can't discount experiment as fraud. You can say, 'You've misinterpreted it," but you had better have something really good to back it up, and in truth, no one ever does. They put out half baked ideas that discount most of the evidence. .

I think you have fallen under the trap of "because there are lies and fraud, that means it is all lies and fraud." The two problems with this is that it is a logical fallacy, and that is just not what the evidence suggests. There is a metric FUCKTON of evidence in experiments that supports "an immune system." I don't even know where to begin to start explaining how many experiments support it. Billions. If you want to discount those experimental results, you have better be able to come up with a theory that fits all of those billions of results other than the one that fits extremely well (immune system).

As to bacteria, they do indeed exist, but don't CAUSE dis-ease.

Bacteria are primarily molecule creation factories. They take molecules in, and put molecules out. In some cases the molecules they put out are helpful, in some cases they are harmful. That's just how it works. That statement is backed by experiment not dogma. Millions, and millions, and millions of experiments. I have done some myself. You are telling me there are five lights. I insist THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS. Because I have seen four lights. For years.

There is no such thing as viruses. Doctors Stefan Lanka, Andrew Kaufman, Tom Cowan, Sam & Mark Bailey have definitively demonstrated this for nearly two years now.

I'm not going to get in to the rest of your diatribe, instead I will say this. Investigations into the Truth are done using the tools of argument and debate. Someone brings their arguments, it is debated with other arguments, the debate continues forever. This allows any new evidence to be presented at any time, and then people look to see how it fits into all the other evidence. Any theory that does not fit all of the evidence is wrong. The theories you are putting forth cannot account for all of the evidence therefore they are wrong. I am not saying the theories put forth in standard biology and medicine account for all of the evidence. I am not saying that at all. I know that is not true. Many scientists know that is not true. Many scientists, myself included, have been saying that forever. That is mostly what science is, doing everything we can to prove our theories wrong. Of course not all scientists feel that way, and there is all sorts of fuckery there, but that is what it is at its core. You think we are all idiots. I assure you we are not.

In this case, the theories that do exist (immune system e.g.) do a better job than the theories put forth by the people you are espousing as "definitive truthsayers" when taking all of the evidence into consideration. I think your favorite truthsayers are likely controlled opposition agents whose sole purpose is to make people who believe that "its in opposition to the establishment therefore it must be true" make everyone else who are also looking into evidence of fuckery look like idiots by association.

Actually there's zero evidence of all you state. For starters, there is no such thing as the "immune system". The medical mafia made it up in 1971 which was its first appearance in any medical textbook. Everything you find in anatomy and physiology textbooks today is pure nonsense, lacking even a modicum of proof. It's literally all scare propaganda, like so much else being offered to us by the controlling forces.

It's like you think we are all idiots (those of us who work in biology and do experiments). Look, there are lies galore in both biology and medicine. There is no doubt about that. My education was full of dogma. I knew it at the time. However, the best lies are based on the truth, especially in a field where everything is experimentally based. A science education is experiment driven. You can't discount experiment as fraud. You can say, 'You've misinterpreted it," but you had better have something really good to back it up, and in truth, no one ever does. They put out half baked ideas that discount most of the evidence. .

I think you have fallen under the trap of "because there are lies and fraud, that means it is all lies and fraud." The two problems with this is that it is a logical fallacy, and that is just not what the evidence suggests. There is a metric FUCKTON of evidence in experiments that supports "an immune system." I don't even know where to begin to start explaining how many experiments support it. Billions. If you want to discount those experimental results, you have better be able to come up with a theory that fits all of those billions of results other than the one that fits extremely well (immune system).

As to bacteria, they do indeed exist, but don't CAUSE dis-ease.

Bacteria are primarily molecule creation factories. They take molecules in, and put molecules out. In some cases the molecules they put out are helpful, in some cases they are harmful. That's just how it works. That statement is backed by experiment not dogma. Millions, and millions, and millions of experiments. I have done some myself. You are telling me there are five lights. I insist THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS. Because I have seen four lights. For years.

There is no such thing as viruses. Doctors Stefan Lanka, Andrew Kaufman, Tom Cowan, Sam & Mark Bailey have definitively demonstrated this for nearly two years now.

I'm not going to get in to the rest of your diatribe, instead I will say this. Investigations into the Truth are done using the tools of argument and debate. Someone brings their arguments, it is debated with other arguments, the debate continues forever. This allows any new evidence to be presented at any time, and then people look to see how it fits into all the other evidence. Any theory that does not fit all of the evidence is wrong. The theories you are putting forth cannot account for all of the evidence therefore they are wrong. I am not saying the theories put forth in standard biology and medicine account for all of the evidence. I am not saying that at all. I know that is not true. Many scientists know that is not true. Many scientists, myself included, have been saying that forever. That is mostly what science is, doing everything we can to prove our theories wrong. Of course not all scientists feel that way, and there is all sorts of fuckery there, but that is what it is at its core. You think we are all idiots. I assure you we are not.

In this case, the theories that do exist (immune system e.g.) do a better job than the theories put forth by the people you are espousing as "definitive truthsayers" when taking all of the evidence into consideration. I think your favorite truthsayers are likely controlled opposition agents whose sole purpose is to make people who believe that "its in opposition to the establishment therefore it must be true" make everyone who is also looking into evidence of fuckery look like idiots by association.