Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Neuralink is working on INVASIVELY implanting electronics in your brain. If THOSE IMPLANTS CORRODE/DECAY/BREAK which happens all the time in invasive Brain-Machine Interface literature, that person is fucked. Those implants don't come out without brain surgery that is too costly for the patient to pay for. (talking an easy 500K-$1Mil minimum, research study won't pay for it).

--

When the implants break down or too many/too large of signals are sent to stimulate the brain, nearby neurons break down and scar tissue forms around the implant, leaving that implant useless and permanently damaging your surrounding brain.

--

One thing they don't tell you is that the FDA by law requires Neuralink (and any company making an invasive medical device) to monitor and send back data from peoples brains to the FDA without the patient's consent or knowledge. FDA's main focus is "efficacy" meaning safety for patient (though we all know that is bullshit with Covid) and

privacy doesn't matter at all in in their regulations.

--

Fuck Neuralink. Work on making something similar that is NONINVASIVE, that is a brain machine interface not requiring surgery so it can just be a cap you wear on your head. That is the technology that brings FREEDOM!

--

Edit: I know a lot about this field, you can ask me anything about it rather than downvoting.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Neuralink is working on INVASIVELY implanting electronics in your brain. If THOSE IMPLANTS CORRODE/DECAY/BREAK which happens all the time in invasive Brain-Machine Interface literature, that person is fucked. Those implants don't come out without brain surgery that is too costly for the patient to pay for.

--

When the implants break down or too many/too large of signals are sent to stimulate the brain, nearby neurons break down and scar tissue forms around the implant, leaving that implant useless and permanently damaging your surrounding brain.

--

One thing they don't tell you is that the FDA by law requires Neuralink (and any company making an invasive medical device) to monitor and send back data from peoples brains to the FDA without the patient's consent or knowledge. FDA's main focus is "efficacy" meaning safety for patient (though we all know that is bullshit with Covid) and

privacy doesn't matter at all in in their regulations.

--

Fuck Neuralink. Work on making something similar that is NONINVASIVE, that is a brain machine interface not requiring surgery so it can just be a cap you wear on your head. That is the technology that brings FREEDOM!

--

Edit: I know a lot about this field, you can ask me anything about it rather than downvoting.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Neuralink is working on INVASIVELY implanting electronics in your brain. If THOSE IMPLANTS CORRODE/DECAY/BREAK which happens all the time in invasive Brain-Machine Interface literature, that person is fucked. Those implants don't come out without brain surgery that is too costly for the patient to pay for.

--

When the implants break down or too many/too large of signals are sent to stimulate the brain, nearby neurons break down and scar tissue forms around the implant, leaving that implant useless and permanently damaging your surrounding brain.

--

One thing they don't tell you is that the FDA by law requires Neuralink (and any company making an invasive medical device) to monitor and send back data from peoples brains to the FDA without the patient's consent or knowledge. FDA's main focus is "efficacy" meaning safety for patient (though we all know that is bullshit with Covid) and privacy doesn't matter at all in in their regulations.

--

Fuck Neuralink. Work on making something similar that is NONINVASIVE, that is a brain machine interface not requiring surgery so it can just be a cap you wear on your head. That is the technology that brings FREEDOM!

--

Edit: I know a lot about this field, you can ask me anything about it rather than downvoting.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Neuralink is working on INVASIVELY implanting electronics in your brain. If THOSE IMPLANTS CORRODE/DECAY/BREAK which happens all the time in invasive Brain-Machine Interface literature, that person is fucked. Those implants don't come out without brain surgery that is too costly for the patient to pay for.

--

When the implants break down or too many/too large of signals are sent to stimulate the brain, nearby neurons break down and scar tissue forms around the implant, leaving that implant useless and permanently damaging your surrounding brain.

--

One thing they don't tell you is that the FDA by law requires Neuralink (and any company making an invasive medical device) to monitor and send back data from peoples brains to the FDA without the patient's consent or knowledge. FDA's main focus is "efficacy" meaning safety and effectiveness (though we all know that is bullshit with Covid) and privacy doesn't matter at all in in their regulations.

--

Fuck Neuralink. Work on making something similar that is NONINVASIVE, that is a brain machine interface not requiring surgery so it can just be a cap you wear on your head. That is the technology that brings FREEDOM!

--

Edit: I know a lot about this field, you can ask me anything about it rather than downvoting.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Neuralink is working on INVASIVELY implanting electronics in your brain. If THOSE IMPLANTS CORRODE/DECAY/BREAK which happens all the time in invasive Brain-Machine Interface literature, that person is fucked. Those implants don't come out without brain surgery that is too costly for the patient to pay for.

--

When the implants break down or too many/too large of signals are sent to stimulate the brain, nearby neurons break down and scar tissue forms around the implant, leaving that implant useless and permanently damaging your surrounding brain.

--

One thing they don't tell you is that the FDA requires Neuralink to monitor and send back data from peoples brains to the FDA without the patient's consent or knowledge. FDA's main focus is "efficacy" meaning safety and effectiveness (though we all know that is bullshit with Covid) and privacy doesn't matter at all in in their regulations.

--

Fuck Neuralink. Work on making something similar that is NONINVASIVE, that is a brain machine interface not requiring surgery so it can just be a cap you wear on your head. That is the technology that brings FREEDOM!

--

Edit: I know a lot about this field, you can ask me anything about it rather than downvoting.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Neuralink is working on INVASIVELY implanting electronics in your brain. If those implants decay/corrode/break which happens all the time in invasive Brain-Machine Interface literature, that person is fucked. Those implants don't come out without brain surgery that is too costly for the patient to pay for.

--

When the implants break down or too many/too large of signals are sent to stimulate the brain, nearby neurons break down and scar tissue forms around the implant, leaving that implant useless and permanently damaging your surrounding brain.

--

One thing they don't tell you is that the FDA requires Neuralink to monitor and send back data from peoples brains to the FDA without the patient's consent or knowledge. FDA's main focus is "efficacy" meaning safety and effectiveness (though we all know that is bullshit with Covid) and privacy doesn't matter at all in in their regulations.

--

Fuck Neuralink. Work on making something similar that is NONINVASIVE, that is a brain machine interface not requiring surgery so it can just be a cap you wear on your head. That is the technology that brings FREEDOM!

--

Edit: I know a lot about this field, you can ask me anything about it rather than downvoting.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Neuralink is working on INVASIVELY implanting electronics in your brain. If those implants decay/corrode/break which happens all the time in invasive Brain-Machine Interface literature, that person is fucked. Those implants don't come out without brain surgery that is too costly for the patient to pay for.

--

When the implants break down or too many/too large of signals are sent to stimulate the brain, nearby neurons break down and scar tissue forms around the implant, leaving that implant useless and permanently damaging your brain.

--

One thing they don't tell you is that the FDA requires Neuralink to monitor and send back data from peoples brains to the FDA without the patient's consent or knowledge. FDA's main focus is "efficacy" meaning safety and effectiveness (though we all know that is bullshit with Covid) and privacy doesn't matter at all in in their regulations.

--

Fuck Neuralink. Work on making something similar that is NONINVASIVE, that is a brain machine interface not requiring surgery so it can just be a cap you wear on your head. That is the technology that brings FREEDOM!

--

Edit: I know a lot about this field, you can ask me anything about it rather than downvoting.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Neuralink is working on INVASIVELY implanting electronics in your brain. If those implants decay/corrode/break which happens all the time in invasive Brain-Machine Interface literature, that person is fucked. Those implants don't come out without brain surgery that is too costly for the patient to pay for.

When the implants break down or too many/too large of signals are sent to stimulate the brain, nearby neurons break down and scar tissue forms around the implant, leaving that implant useless and permanently damaging your brain.

One thing they don't tell you is that the FDA requires Neuralink to monitor and send back data from peoples brains to the FDA without the patient's consent or knowledge. FDA's main focus is "efficacy" meaning safety and effectiveness (though we all know that is bullshit with Covid) and privacy doesn't matter at all in in their regulations.

Fuck Neuralink. Work on making something similar that is NONINVASIVE, that is a brain machine interface not requiring surgery so it can just be a cap you wear on your head. That is the technology that brings FREEDOM!

Edit: I know a lot about this field, you can ask me anything about it rather than downvoting.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Neuralink is working on INVASIVELY implanting electronics in your brain. If those implants decay/corrode/break which happens all the time in invasive Brain-Machine Interface literature, that person is fucked. Those implants don't come out without brain surgery that is too costly for the patient to pay for.


When the implants break down or too many/too large of signals are sent to stimulate the brain, nearby neurons break down and scar tissue forms around the implant, leaving that implant useless and permanently damaging your brain.


One thing they don't tell you is that the FDA requires Neuralink to monitor and send back data from peoples brains to the FDA without the patient's consent or knowledge. FDA's main focus is "efficacy" meaning safety and effectiveness (though we all know that is bullshit with Covid) and privacy doesn't matter at all in in their regulations.


Fuck Neuralink. Work on making something similar that is NONINVASIVE, that is a brain machine interface not requiring surgery so it can just be a cap you wear on your head. That is the technology that brings FREEDOM!


Edit: I know a lot about this field, you can ask me anything about it rather than downvoting.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Neuralink is working on INVASIVELY implanting electronics in your brain. If those implants decay/corrode/break which happens all the time in invasive Brain-Machine Interface literature, that person is fucked. Those implants don't come out without brain surgery that is too costly for the patient to pay for.

When the implants break down or too many/too large of signals are sent to stimulate the brain, nearby neurons break down and scar tissue forms around the implant, leaving that implant useless and permanently damaging your brain.

One thing they don't tell you is that the FDA requires Neuralink to monitor and send back data from peoples brains to the FDA without the patient's consent or knowledge. FDA's main focus is "efficacy" meaning safety and effectiveness (though we all know that is bullshit with Covid) and privacy doesn't matter at all in in their regulations.

Fuck Neuralink. Work on making something similar that is NONINVASIVE, that is a brain machine interface not requiring surgery so it can just be a cap you wear on your head. That is the technology that brings FREEDOM!

Edit: I know a lot about this field, you can ask me anything about it rather than downvoting.

2 years ago
0 score
Reason: Original

Neuralink is working on INVASIVELY implanting electronics in your brain. If those implants decay/corrode/break which happens all the time in invasive Brain-Machine Interface literature, that person is fucked. Those implants don't come out without brain surgery that is too costly for the patient to pay for.

When the implants break down or too many/too large of signals are sent to stimulate the brain, nearby neurons break down and scar tissue forms around the implant, leaving that implant useless and permanently damaging your brain.

One thing they don't tell you is that the FDA requires Neuralink to monitor and send back data from peoples brains to the FDA without the patient's consent or knowledge. FDA's main focus is "efficacy" meaning safety and effectiveness (though we all know that is bullshit with Covid) and privacy doesn't matter at all in in there.

Fuck Neuralink. Work on making something similar that is NONINVASIVE, that is a brain machine interface not requiring surgery so it can just be a cap you wear on your head. That is the technology that brings FREEDOM!

2 years ago
1 score