I wasn't making moral judgements, I was saying it wasn't clear cut.

In addition, your rebuttal was not a direct address of my example of complicity but an extension into the opposite extreme while leaving out a very important piece of it. If you know that robber is going to use that money for heinous acts against other people (which is what we are talking about) then perhaps you should fight him off.

I wasn't making moral judgements, I was saying it wasn't clear cut.

In addition, your rebuttal was not a direct address of my example of complicity but an extension into the opposite extreme while leaving out a very important piece of it. If you know that robber is going to use that money for heinous acts (which is what we are talking about) then perhaps you should fight him off.

I wasn't making moral judgements, I was saying it wasn't clear cut.

In addition, your rebuttal was not a direct address of my example of complicity but an extension into the opposite extreme while leaving out a very important piece of the complicity. If you know that robber is going to use that money for heinous acts (which is what we are talking about) then perhaps you should fight him off.