Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Even though such might be true (for now), at the end of the day, GAW is largely associated (majorly) with one specific social / political / religious ideology and commentary over matters --- as it pertains to but one specific country, as also certain biases (that are mostly inherent to any given discussion) that come with such a highly-specific configuration, permutation, and combination of things, here. To say that we are a kind of an echo chamber (to some degree), wouldn't necessarily be that much of a stretch, here. Granted, that such was by no means a fault of our own, here; for, had the lefties themselves not gone all out Nazi to begin with (across practically every imaginable social media outlet there is), we'd probably be having far more balanced sorts of discussions, perspectives, ideas, and (idea / information / knowledge / wisdom) exchanges and such.


Because, at the end of the day, no one side is always right about everything, always correct, and always perfect to the T with respect to their opinions and perspectives, here. People are different, and think differently, and such is to be celebrated and appreciated (over giving in to any forms and manners of polarizations, echo-chamber creations, etc.). It is always good to have and see multiple perspectives, for such is what ultimately enriches and expands us. In fact, the more the number of perspectives we listen to, the deeper and richer do we really even become as a person.


Be it left wing or right wing or center wing, no one person or grouping is always correct about it all. And that without listening to others' unique perspectives (many, which may even be directly in contradiction or opposition to our own); we would essentially end up becoming a society full of clones, robots, zombies and NPCs. Which is by far the very last thing that we'd ever really want, of course. Coz we can already see all too well as to how that has been playing out (as of late).


The ideal discussion forum is one where all are represented in equal measure, and where there are no personal biases and preferences, no shady shit, no censorship, and, above all, open and fair discourses in which one and all can participate without being blocked, muted, or straight up shadow-banned out of the discussion or such.

Just my 2 cents on this one.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Even though such might be true (for now), at the end of the day, GAW is largely associated (majorly) with one specific social / political / religious ideology and commentary over matters --- as it pertains to but one specific country, as also certain biases (that are mostly inherent to any given discussion) that come with such a highly-specific configuration, permutation, and combination of things, here. To say that we are a kind of an echo chamber (to some degree), wouldn't necessarily be that much of a stretch, here. Granted, that such was by no means a fault of our own, here; for, had the lefties themselves not gone all out Nazi to begin with (across practically every imaginable social media outlet there is), we'd probably be having far more balanced sorts of discussions, perspectives, ideas, and (idea / information / knowledge / wisdom) exchanges and such.


Because, at the end of the day, no one side is always right about everything, always correct, and always perfect to the T with respect to their opinions and perspectives, here. People are different, and think differently, and such is to be celebrated and appreciated (over giving in to any forms and manners of polarizations, echo-chamber creations, etc.). It is always good to have and see multiple perspectives, for such is what ultimately enriches and expands us. In fact, the more the number of perspectives we listen to, the deeper and richer do we really even become as a person.


Be it left wing or right wing or center wing, no one person or grouping is always correct about it all. And that without listening to others' unique perspectives (many, which may even be directly in contradiction or opposition to our own); we would essentially end up becoming a society full of clones, robots, zombies and NPCs. Which is by far the very last thing that we'd ever really want, of course. Coz we can already see all too well as to how that has been playing out (as of late).


The ideal discussion forum is one where all are represented in equal measure, and where there are no personal biases and preferences, no shady shit, no censorship, and, above all, open and fair discourse in which one and all can participate without being blocked, muted, or straight up shadow-banned out of the discussion or such.

Just my 2 cents on this one.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Even though such might be true (for now), at the end of the day, GAW is largely associated (majorly) with one specific social / political / religious ideology and commentary over matters --- as it pertains to but one specific country, as also certain biases (that are mostly inherent to any given discussion) that come with such a highly-specific configuration, permutation, and combination of things, here. To say that we are a kind of an echo chamber (to some degree), wouldn't necessarily be that much of a stretch, here. Granted, that such was by no means a fault of our own, here; for, had the lefties themselves not gone all out Nazi to begin with (across practically every imaginable social media outlet there is), we'd probably be having far more balanced sorts of discussions, perspectives, ideas, and (idea / information / knowledge / wisdom) exchanges and such.


Because, at the end of the day, no one side is always right about everything, always correct, and always perfect to the T with respect to their opinions and perspectives, here. People are different, and think differently, and such is to be celebrated and appreciated (over giving in to any forms and manners of polarizations, echo-chamber creations, etc.). It is always good to have and see multiple perspectives, for such is what ultimately enriches and expands us. In fact, the more the number of perspectives we listen to, the deeper and richer do we become as a person.


Be it left wing or right wing or center wing, no one person or grouping is always correct about it all. And that without listening to others' unique perspectives (many, which may even be directly in contradiction or opposition to our own); we would essentially end up becoming a society full of clones, robots, zombies and NPCs. Which is by far the very last thing that we'd ever really want, of course. Coz we can already see all too well as to how that has been playing out (as of late).


The ideal discussion forum is one where all are represented in equal measure, and where there are no personal biases and preferences, no shady shit, no censorship, and, above all, open and fair discourse in which one and all can participate without being blocked, muted, or straight up shadow-banned out of the discussion or such.

Just my 2 cents on this one.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Even though such might be true (for now), at the end of the day, GAW is largely associated (majorly) with one specific social / political / religious ideology and commentary over matters --- as it pertains to but one specific country, as also certain biases (that are mostly inherent to any given discussion) that come with such a highly-specific configuration, permutation, and combination of things, here. To say that we are a kind of an echo chamber (to some degree), wouldn't necessarily be that much of a stretch, here. Granted, that such was by no means a fault of our own, here; for, had the lefties themselves not gone all out Nazi to begin with (across practically every imaginable social media outlet there is), we'd probably be having far more balanced sorts of discussions, perspectives, ideas, and (idea / information / knowledge / wisdom) exchanges and such.


Because, at the end of the day, no one side is always right about everything, always correct, and always perfect to the T with respect to their opinions and perspectives, here. People are different, and think differently, and such is to be celebrated and appreciated (over giving in to any forms and manners of polarizations, echo-chamber creations, etc.). It is always good to have and see multiple perspectives, for such is what ultimately enriches and expands us. In fact, the more the number of perspectives we listen to, the deeper and richer do we become as a person.


Be it left wing or right wing or center wing, no one person or grouping is always correct about it all. And that without listening to others' unique perspectives (many, which may even be directly in contradiction or opposition to our own); we would essentially end up becoming a society full of clones, robots, zombies and NPCs. Which is by far the very last thing that we'd ever really want, of course. Coz we can already see all too well as to how that has been playing out (as of late).


The ideal discussion forum is one where all are represented in equal measure, and where there are no personal biases and preferences, no shady shit, no censorship, and, above all, open and fair discourse in which one and all can participate without being blocked, muted, or straight up shadow-banned out of the discussion or such.

Just my 2 cents on this one.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Even though such might be true (for now), at the end of the day, GAW is largely associated (majorly) with one specific social / political / religious ideology and commentary over matters --- as it pertains to but one specific country, as also certain biases (that are mostly inherent to any given discussion) that come with such a highly-specific configuration, permutation, and combination of things, here. To say that we are a kind of an echo chamber (to some degree), wouldn't necessarily be that much of a stretch, here. Granted, that such was by no means a fault of our own, here; for, had the lefties themselves not gone all out Nazi to begin with (across practically every imaginable social media outlet there is), we'd probably be having far more balanced sorts of discussions, perspectives, ideas, and (idea / information / knowledge / wisdom) exchanges and such.


Because, at the end of the day, no one side is always right about everything, always correct, and always perfect to the T with respect to their opinions and perspectives, here. People are different, and think differently, and such is to be celebrated and appreciated (over giving in to any forms and manners of polarizations, echo-chamber creations, etc.). It is always good to have and see multiple perspectives, for such is what ultimately enriches and expands us. In fact, the more the number of perspectives we listen to, the deeper and richer do we become as a person.


Be it left wing or right wing or center wing, no one person or grouping is always correct about it all. And that without listening to others' unique perspectives (many, which may even be directly in contradiction or opposition to our own); we would essentially end up becoming a society full of clones, robots, zombies and NPCs. Which is by far the very last thing that we'd ever really want, of course. Coz we can already see all too well as to how that has been playing out (as of late).


The ideal discussion forum is one where all are represented in equal measure, and where there are no personal biases and preferences, no shady shit, no censorship, and, above all, open and fair discourse in which one and all can participate without being blocked, muted, or straight up shadow-banned out of the discussion or such.

Just my 2 cents on this one.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Even though such might be true (for now), at the end of the day, GAW is largely associated (majorly) with one specific social / political / religious ideology and commentary over matters --- as it pertains to but one specific country, as also certain biases (that are mostly inherent to any given discussion) that come with such a highly-specific configuration, permutation, and combination of things, here. To say that we are a kind of an echo chamber (to some degree), wouldn't necessarily be that much of a stretch, here. Granted, that such was by no means a fault of our own, here; for, had the lefties themselves not gone all out Nazi to begin with (across practically every imaginable social media outlet there is), we'd probably be having far more balanced sorts of discussions, perspectives, ideas, and (idea / information / knowledge / wisdom) exchanges and such.


Because, at the end of the day, no one side is always right about everything, always correct, and always perfect to the T with respect to their opinions and perspectives. People are different, and think differently, and such is to be celebrated and appreciated (over giving in to any forms and manners of polarizations, echo-chamber creations, etc.). It is always good to have and see multiple perspectives, for such is what ultimately enriches and expands us. In fact, the more the number of perspectives we listen to, the deeper and richer do we become as a person.


Be it left wing or right wing or center wing, no one person or grouping is always correct about it all. And that without listening to others' unique perspectives (many, which may even be directly in contradiction or opposition to our own); we would essentially end up becoming a society full of clones, robots, zombies and NPCs. Which is by far the very last thing that we'd ever really want, of course. Coz we can already see all too well as to how that has been playing out (as of late).


The ideal discussion forum is one where all are represented in equal measure, and where there are no personal biases and preferences, no shady shit, no censorship, and, above all, open and fair discourse in which one and all can participate without being blocked, muted, or straight up shadow-banned out of the discussion or such.

Just my 2 cents on this one.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Even though such might be true (for now), at the end of the day, GAW is largely associated (majorly) with one specific social / political / religious ideology and commentary over matters --- as it pertains to but one specific country, as also certain biases (that are mostly inherent to any given discussion) that come with such a highly-specific configuration, permutation, and combination of things, here. To say that we are a kind of an echo chamber (to some degree), wouldn't necessarily be that much of a stretch, here. Granted, that such was by no means a fault of our own, here; for, had the lefties themselves not gone all out Nazi to begin with (across practically every imaginable social media outlet there is), we'd probably be having far more balanced sorts of discussions, perspectives, ideas, and (idea / information / knowledge / wisdom) exchanges and such.


Because, at the end of the day, no one side is always right about everything, always correct, and always perfect to the T with respect to their opinions and perspectives. People are different, and think differently, and such is to be celebrated and appreciated (over giving in to any forms and manners of polarizations, echo-chamber creations, etc.). It is always good to have and see multiple perspectives, for such is what ultimately enriches and expands us. In fact, the more the number of perspectives we listen to, the deeper and richer do we become as a person.


Be it left wing or right wing or center wing, no one person or grouping is always correct about it all. And that without listening to others' unique perspectives (many, which may even be directly in contradiction or opposition to our own); we would essentially end up becoming a society full of clones, robots, zombies and NPCs. Which is by far the very last thing that we'd ever really want, of course. Coz we can already see all too well as to how that has been playing out (as of late).


The ideal discussion forum is one where all are represented in equal measure, and where there are no personal biases and preferences, no shady shit, no censorship, and, above all, open and fair discourse in which one and all can participate without being blocked, muted, or straight up shadow-banned out of the discussion or such.

Just my 2 cents on this one.

2 years ago
1 score