Glad you asked. ;-)

All of virology is based on a scam. Most virologists have not figured this out (yet).

No person has ever been able to find a virus in any bodily fluid of any person or animal. Ever.

Instead, they use a process to "see" the virus. This process requires that they (a) take a fluid from a sick person, but (b) they do NOT isolate and purify it from other genetic material that is mixed in with it (even though this step should be done, and is done when studying bacteria, for example), then (c) they ADD to this fluid a mixture of other genetic material (like fetal lung cells and other items), then (d) they ADD chemicals which deprive nutrients, as well as antibiotics which are specifically designed to kill kidney cells, then (e) they spread this onto monkey kidney cells, then (f) they wait a few days for something to happen, and (g) when the monkey kidney cells die, they claim that it was the virus within that concoction (starting with the bodily fluid) that killed the monkey kidney cells. This is the ONLY "proof" that virologists have EVER used to claim that ANY virus exists.

They never stop to consider the possibility that it was actually the antibiotics, which are designed to kill kidney cells, that killed the monkey kidney cells in these experiments. They put the end result under an electron microscope (not a regular microscope), and they take photos of what they see.

What they see in the photos appear to be "spikes" coming out of something. This is referred to as the corona ("crown" in Spanish), and is what virologists claim is "the virus."

They then pay an artist to create artistic renderings of what they think they see, and this is what is published as "proof" of a virus.

But ...

What if it was not a virus at all in the bodily fluid of the sick person that killed the monkey kidney cells? What if it was the process itself that created these spikes (by adding these poisons to the fluid mixture)? What if these spikes are nothing more than ejection of material from the cells when they are poisoned?

This question had never been asked by any virologist, since the 1950's when these original experiments were done.

This has been the ONLY way that virologists "find a virus" for the past 70 years.

But in April 2021, German virologist Stephan Lanka realized there could be a problem here. He did the research to show that you can use (a) a bodily fluid of a sick person, run it through this process, and get the end result that looks like a "virus" ... OR ... (b) you can START WITH NO BODILY FLUID FROM ANY HUMAN OR ANIMAL, run it through this process, and you get the SAME end result that looks like a "virus."

Either way -- start with a bodily fluid, or leave that out completely -- you get the same end result.

This proves that the thing that virologists think they are looking at is not a virus from a sick person, but rather is merely the cellular debris kicked out of a dying cell that has been poisoned.

In addition, many attempts have been made for more than 100 years to prove that a sick person with a "virus" can make someone else sick. They have done experiments by taking bodily fluids of sick people (who were thought to be sick due to a virus) and given those fluids to healthy people, by breathing, coughing, snorting, injecting, putting it into their eyeballs, etc.

Yet, not ONE person has ever become sick in these experiments. There is NO PROOF of transmission of sickness.

And now, there is NO PROOF of a "virus" causing these spikes to be produced. They are produced by the PROCESS that virologists used, not by a non-existent virus.

The so-called "spikes" seen in the electron microscopy photos are nothing more than exosomes, which are cellular debris ejected from poisoned cells, as they die. There is no reason to believe they are harmful or cause any illness.

Tom Cowan and Andy Kaufman led the funding for Lanka's 2021 research. They do a great job of explaining it here:

https://rumble.com/vtd2cf-cov-myths-exposed-scientists-prove-sars-cov-2-cov-dont-exist.html

Glad you asked. ;-)

All of virology is based on a scam. Most virologists have not figured this out (yet).

No person has ever been able to find a virus in any bodily fluid of any person or animal. Ever.

Instead, they use a process to "see" the virus. This process requires that they (a) take a fluid from a sick person, but (b) they do NOT isolate and purify it from other genetic material that is mixed in with it (even though this step should be done, and is done when studying bacteria, for example), then (c) they ADD to this fluid a mixture of other genetic material (like fetal lung cells and other items), then (d) they ADD chemicals which deprive nutrients, as well as antibiotics which are specifically designed to kill kidney cells, then (e) they spread this onto monkey kidney cells, then (f) they wait a few days for something to happen, and (g) when the monkey kidney cells die, they claim that it was the virus within that concoction (starting with the bodily fluid) that killed the monkey kidney cells. This is the ONLY "proof" that virologists have EVER used to claim that ANY virus exists.

They never stop to consider the possibility that it was actually the antibiotics, which are designed to kill kidney cells, that killed the monkey kidney cells in these experiments. They put the end result under an electron microscope (not a regular microscope), and they take photos of what they see.

What they see in the photos appear to be "spikes" coming out of something. This is referred to as the corona ("crown" in Spanish), and is what virologists claim is "the virus."

They then pay an artist to create artistic renderings of what they think they see, and this is what is published as "proof" of a virus.

But ...

What if it was not a virus at all in the bodily fluid of the sick person that killed the monkey kidney cells? What if it was the process itself that created these spikes (by adding these poisons to the fluid mixture)? What if these spikes are nothing more than ejection of material from the cells when they are poisoned?

This question had never been asked by any virologist, since the 1950's when these original experiments were done.

This has been the ONLY way that virologists "find a virus" for the past 70 years.

But in April 2021, German virologist Stephan Lanka realized there could be a problem here. He did the research to show that you can use (a) a bodily fluid of a sick person, run it through this process, and get the end result that looks like a "virus" ... OR ... (b) you can START WITH NO BODILY FLUID FROM ANY HUMAN OR ANIMAL, run it through this process, and you get the SAME end result that looks like a "virus."

Either way -- start with a bodily fluid, or leave that out completely -- you get the same end result.

This proves that the thing that virologists think they are looking at is not a virus from a sick person, but rather is merely the cellular debris kicked out of a dying cell that has been poisoned.

In addition, many attempts have been made for more than 100 years to prove that a sick person with a "virus" can make someone else sick. They have done experiments by taking bodily fluids of sick people (who were thought to be sick due to a virus) and given those fluids to healthy people, by breathing, coughing, snorting, injecting, putting it into their eyeballs, etc.

Yet, not ONE person has ever become sick in these experiments. There is NO PROOF of transmission of sickness.

And now, there is NO PROOF of a "virus" causing these spikes to be produced. They are produced by the PROCESS that virologists used, not by a non-existent virus. The so-called "spikes" seen in the electron microscopy photos are nothing more than exosomes, which are cellular debris ejected from poisoned cells, as they die. There is no reason to believe they are harmful or cause any illness.

Tom Cowan and Andy Kaufman led the funding for Lanka's 2021 research. They do a great job of explaining it here:

https://rumble.com/vtd2cf-cov-myths-exposed-scientists-prove-sars-cov-2-cov-dont-exist.html

Glad you asked. ;-)

All of virology is based on a scam. Most virologists have not figured this out (yet).

No person has ever been able to find a virus in any bodily fluid of any person or animal. Ever.

Instead, they use a process to "see" the virus. This process requires that they (a) take a fluid from a sick person, but (b) they do NOT isolate and purify it from other genetic material that is mixed in with it (even though this step should be done, and is done when studying bacteria, for example), then (c) they ADD to this fluid a mixture of other genetic material (like fetal lung cells and other items), then (d) they ADD chemicals which deprive nutrients, as well as antibiotics which are specifically designed to kill kidney cells, then (e) they spread this onto monkey kidney cells, then (f) they wait a few days for something to happen, and (g) when the monkey kidney cells die, they claim that it was the virus within that concoction (starting with the bodily fluid) that killed the monkey kidney cells. This is the ONLY "proof" that virologists have EVER used to claim that ANY virus exists.

They never stop to consider the possibility that it was actually the antibiotics, which are designed to kill kidney cells, that killed the monkey kidney cells in these experiments. They put the end result under an electron microscope (not a regular microscope), and they take photos of what they see.

What they see in the photos appear to be "spikes" coming out of something. This is referred to as the corona ("crown" in Spanish), and is what virologists claim is "the virus."

They then pay an artist to create artistic renderings of what they think they see, and this is what is published as "proof" of a virus.

But ...

What if it was not a virus at all in the bodily fluid of the sick person that killed the monkey kidney cells? What if it was the process itself that created these spikes (by adding these poisons to the fluid mixture)? What if these spikes are nothing more than ejection of material from the cells when they are poisoned?

This question had never been asked by any virologist, since the 1950's when these original experiments were done.

This has been the ONLY way that virologists "find a virus" for the past 70 years.

But in April 2021, German virologist Stephan Lanka realized there could be a problem here. He did the research to show that you can use (a) a bodily fluid of a sick person, run it through this process, and get the end result that looks like a "virus" ... OR ... (b) you can START WITH NO BODILY FLUID FROM ANY HUMAN OR ANIMAL, run it through this process, and you get the SAME end result that looks like a "virus."

Either way -- start with a bodily fluid, or leave that out completely -- you get the same end result.

This proves that the thing that virologists think they are looking at is not a virus from a sick person, but rather is merely the cellular debris kicked out of a dying cell that has been poisoned.

In addition, many attempts have been made for more than 100 years to prove that a sick person with a "virus" can make someone else sick. They have done experiments by taking bodily fluids of sick people (who were thought to be sick due to a virus) and given those fluids to healthy people, by breathing, coughing, snorting, injecting, putting it into their eyeballs, etc.

Yet, not ONE person has ever become sick in these experiments. There is NO PROOF of transmission of sickness.

And now, there is NO PROOF of a "virus" causing these spikes to be produced. They are produced by the PROCESS that virologists used, not by a non-existent virus.

Tom Cowan and Andy Kaufman led the funding for Lanka's 2021 research. They do a great job of explaining it here:

https://rumble.com/vtd2cf-cov-myths-exposed-scientists-prove-sars-cov-2-cov-dont-exist.html

Glad you asked. ;-)

All of virology is based on a scam. Most virologists have not figured this out (yet).

No person has ever been able to find a virus in any bodily fluid of any person or animal. Ever.

Instead, they use a process to "see" the virus. This process requires that they (a) take a fluid from a sick person, but (b) they do NOT isolate and purify it from other genetic material that is mixed in with it (even though this step should be done, and is done when studying bacteria, for example), then (c) they ADD to this fluid a mixture of other genetic material (like fetal lung cells and other items), then (d) they ADD chemicals which deprive nutrients, as well as antibiotics which are specifically designed to kill kidney cells, then (e) they spread this onto monkey kidney cells, then (f) they wait a few days for something to happen, and (g) when the monkey kidney cells die, they claim that it was the virus within that concoction (starting with the bodily fluid) that killed the monkey kidney cells. This is the ONLY "proof" that virologists have EVER used to claim that ANY virus exists.

They never stop to consider the possibility that it was actually the antibiotics, which are designed to kill kidney cells, that killed the monkey kidney cells in these experiments. They put the end result under an electron microscope (not a regular microscope), and they take photos of what they see.

What they see in the photos appear to be "spikes" coming out of something. This is referred to as the corona ("crown" in Spanish), and is what virologists claim is "the virus."

They then pay an artist to create artistic renderings of what they think they see, and this is what is published as "proof" of a virus.

But ...

What if it was not a virus at all in the bodily fluid of the sick person that killed the monkey kidney cells? What if it was the process itself that created these spikes (by adding these poisons to the fluid mixture)? What if these spikes are nothing more than ejection of material from the cells when they are poisoned?

This question had never been asked by any virologist, since the 1950's when these original experiments were done.

This has been the ONLY way that virologists "find a virus" for the past 70 years.

But in April 2021, German virologist Stephan Lanka realized there could be a problem here. He did the research to show that you can use (a) a bodily fluid of a sick person, and run it through this process and get the end result that looks like a "virus" ... OR ... (b) you can JUST do the process with NO BODILY FLUID FROM ANY HUMAN OR ANIMAL, and run it through this process, and you get the SAME end result that looks like a "virus."

This proves that the thing that virologists think they are looking at is not a virus from a sick person, but rather is merely the cellular debris kicked out of a dying cell that has been poisoned.

In addition, many attempts have been made for more than 100 years to prove that a sick person with a "virus" can make someone else sick. They have done experiments by taking bodily fluids of sick people (who were thought to be sick due to a virus) and given those fluids to healthy people, by breathing, coughing, snorting, injecting, putting it into their eyeballs, etc.

Yet, not ONE person has ever become sick in these experiments. There is NO PROOF of transmission of sickness.

And now, there is NO PROOF of a "virus" causing these spikes to be produced. They are produced by the PROCESS that virologists used, not by a non-existent virus.

Tom Cowan and Andy Kaufman led the funding for Lanka's 2021 research. They do a great job of explaining it here:

https://rumble.com/vtd2cf-cov-myths-exposed-scientists-prove-sars-cov-2-cov-dont-exist.html

Glad you asked. ;-)

All of virology is based on a scam. Most virologists have not figured this out (yet).

No person has ever been able to find a virus in any bodily fluid of any person or animal. Ever.

Instead, they use a process to "see" the virus. This process requires that they (a) take a fluid from a sick person, but (b) they do NOT isolate and purify it from other genetic material that is mixed in with it (even though this step should be done, and is done when studying bacteria, for example), then (c) they ADD to this fluid a mixture of other genetic material (like fetal lung cells and other items), then (d) they ADD chemicals which deprive nutrients, as well as, antibiotics which are specifically designed to kill kidney cells, then (e) they spread this onto monkey kidney cells, then (f) they wait a few days for something to happen, and (g) when the monkey kidney cells die, they claim that it was the virus within that concoction (starting with the bodily fluid) that killed the monkey kidney cells. This is the ONLY "proof" that virologists have EVER used to claim that ANY virus exists.

They never stop to consider the possibility that it was actually the antibiotics, which are designed to kill kidney cells, that killed the monkey kidney cells in these experiments. They put the end result under an electron microscope (not a regular microscope), and they take photos of what they see.

What they see in the photos appear to be "spikes" coming out of something. This is referred to as the corona ("crown" in Spanish), and is what virologists claim is "the virus."

They then pay an artist to create artistic renderings of what they think they see, and this is what is published as "proof" of a virus.

But ...

What if it was not a virus at all in the bodily fluid of the sick person that killed the monkey kidney cells? What if it was the process itself that created these spikes (by adding these poisons to the fluid mixture)? What if these spikes are nothing more than ejection of material from the cells when they are poisoned?

This question had never been asked by any virologist, since the 1950's when these original experiments were done.

This has been the ONLY way that virologists "find a virus" for the past 70 years.

But in April 2021, German virologist Stephan Lanka realized there could be a problem here. He did the research to show that you can use (a) a bodily fluid of a sick person, and run it through this process and get the end result that looks like a "virus" ... OR ... (b) you can JUST do the process with NO BODILY FLUID FROM ANY HUMAN OR ANIMAL, and run it through this process, and you get the SAME end result that looks like a "virus."

This proves that the thing that virologists think they are looking at is not a virus from a sick person, but rather is merely the cellular debris kicked out of a dying cell that has been poisoned.

In addition, many attempts have been made for more than 100 years to prove that a sick person with a "virus" can make someone else sick. They have done experiments by taking bodily fluids of sick people (who were thought to be sick due to a virus) and given those fluids to healthy people, by breathing, coughing, snorting, injecting, putting it into their eyeballs, etc.

Yet, not ONE person has ever become sick in these experiments. There is NO PROOF of transmission of sickness.

And now, there is NO PROOF of a "virus" causing these spikes to be produced. They are produced by the PROCESS that virologists used, not by a non-existent virus.

Tom Cowan and Andy Kaufman led the funding for Lanka's 2021 research. They do a great job of explaining it here:

https://rumble.com/vtd2cf-cov-myths-exposed-scientists-prove-sars-cov-2-cov-dont-exist.html

Glad you asked. ;-)

All of virology is based on a scam. Most virologists have not figured this out (yet).

No person has ever been able to find a virus in any bodily fluid of any person or animal. Ever.

Instead, they use a process to "see" the virus. This process requires that they (a) take a fluid from a sick person, but (b) they do NOT isolate and purify it from other genetic material that is mixed in with it (even though this step should be done, and is done when studying bacteria, for example), then (c) they ADD to this fluid a mixture of other genetic material (like fetal lung cells and other items), then (d) they ADD chemicals which deprive nutrients, as well as, antibiotics which are specifically designed to kill kidney cells, then (e) they spread this onto monkey kidney cells, then (f) they wait a few days for something to happen, and (g) when the monkey kidney cells die, they claim that it was the virus within that concoction (starting with the bodily fluid) that killed the monkey kidney cells. This is the ONLY "proof" that virologists have EVER used to claim that ANY virus exists.

[In the case of measles, they also drilled a hole into the skull of a monkey, poured a concoction in, and killed the monkey, claiming that the measles virus is what killed the monkey. But, I digress.]

They never stop to consider the possibility that it was actually the antibiotics, which are designed to kill kidney cells, that killed the monkey kidney cells in these experiments. They put the end result under an electron microscope (not a regular microscope), and they take photos of what they see.

What they see in the photos appear to be "spikes" coming out of something. This is referred to as the corona ("crown" in Spanish), and is what virologists claim is "the virus."

They then pay an artist to create artistic renderings of what they think they see, and this is what is published as "proof" of a virus.

But ...

What if it was not a virus at all in the bodily fluid of the sick person that killed the monkey kidney cells? What if it was the process itself that created these spikes (by adding these poisons to the fluid mixture)? What if these spikes are nothing more than ejection of material from the cells when they are poisoned?

This question had never been asked by any virologist, since the 1950's when these original experiments were done.

This has been the ONLY way that virologists "find a virus" for the past 70 years.

But in April 2021, German virologist Stephan Lanka realized there could be a problem here. He did the research to show that you can use (a) a bodily fluid of a sick person, and run it through this process and get the end result that looks like a "virus" ... OR ... (b) you can JUST do the process with NO BODILY FLUID FROM ANY HUMAN OR ANIMAL, and run it through this process, and you get the SAME end result that looks like a "virus."

This proves that the thing that virologists think they are looking at is not a virus from a sick person, but rather is merely the cellular debris kicked out of a dying cell that has been poisoned.

In addition, many attempts have been made for more than 100 years to prove that a sick person with a "virus" can make someone else sick. They have done experiments by taking bodily fluids of sick people (who were thought to be sick due to a virus) and given those fluids to healthy people, by breathing, coughing, snorting, injecting, putting it into their eyeballs, etc.

Yet, not ONE person has ever become sick in these experiments. There is NO PROOF of transmission of sickness.

And now, there is NO PROOF of a "virus" causing these spikes to be produced. They are produced by the PROCESS that virologists used, not by a non-existent virus.

Tom Cowan and Andy Kaufman led the funding for Lanka's 2021 research. They do a great job of explaining it here:

https://rumble.com/vtd2cf-cov-myths-exposed-scientists-prove-sars-cov-2-cov-dont-exist.html

Glad you asked. ;-)

All of virology is based on a scam. Most virologists have not figured this out (yet).

No person has ever been able to find a virus in any bodily fluid of any person or animal. Ever.

Instead, they use a process to "see" the virus. This process requires that they (a) take a fluid from a sick person, (b) specifically NOT isolate and purify it from other genetic material that is mixed in with it (even though this step should be done, and is done when studying bacteria, for example), then (c) they ADD to this fluid a mixture of other genetic material (like fetal lung cells and other items), and (d) they ADD chemicals which deprive nutrients, as well as, antibiotics which are specifically designed to kill kidney cells, then (e) they spread this onto monkey kidney cells, (f) they wait a few days for something to happen, and (g) hen the monkey kidney cells die, they claim that it was the virus within that concoction (starting with the bodily fluid) that killed the monkey kidney cells. This is the ONLY "proof" that virologists have EVER used to claim that ANY virus exists.

[In the case of measles, they also drilled a hole into the skull of a monkey, poured a concoction in, and killed the monkey, claiming that the measles virus is what killed the monkey. But, I digress.]

They never stop to consider the possibility that it was actually the antibiotics, which are designed to kill kidney cells, that killed the monkey kidney cells in these experiments. They put the end result under an electron microscope (not a regular microscope), and they take photos of what they see.

What they see in the photos appear to be "spikes" coming out of something. This is referred to as the corona ("crown" in Spanish), and is what virologists claim is "the virus."

They then pay an artist to create artistic renderings of what they think they see, and this is what is published as "proof" of a virus.

But ...

What if it was not a virus at all in the bodily fluid of the sick person that killed the monkey kidney cells? What if it was the process itself that created these spikes (by adding these poisons to the fluid mixture)? What if these spikes are nothing more than ejection of material from the cells when they are poisoned?

This question had never been asked by any virologist, since the 1950's when these original experiments were done.

This has been the ONLY way that virologists "find a virus" for the past 70 years.

But in April 2021, German virologist Stephan Lanka realized there could be a problem here. He did the research to show that you can use (a) a bodily fluid of a sick person, and run it through this process and get the end result that looks like a "virus" ... OR ... (b) you can JUST do the process with NO BODILY FLUID FROM ANY HUMAN OR ANIMAL, and run it through this process, and you get the SAME end result that looks like a "virus."

This proves that the thing that virologists think they are looking at is not a virus from a sick person, but rather is merely the cellular debris kicked out of a dying cell that has been poisoned.

In addition, many attempts have been made for more than 100 years to prove that a sick person with a "virus" can make someone else sick. They have done experiments by taking bodily fluids of sick people (who were thought to be sick due to a virus) and given those fluids to healthy people, by breathing, coughing, snorting, injecting, putting it into their eyeballs, etc.

Yet, not ONE person has ever become sick in these experiments. There is NO PROOF of transmission of sickness.

And now, there is NO PROOF of a "virus" causing these spikes to be produced. They are produced by the PROCESS that virologists used, not by a non-existent virus.

Tom Cowan and Andy Kaufman led the funding for Lanka's 2021 research. They do a great job of explaining it here:

https://rumble.com/vtd2cf-cov-myths-exposed-scientists-prove-sars-cov-2-cov-dont-exist.html

Glad you asked. ;-)

All of virology is based on a scam. Most virologists have not figured this out (yet).

No person has ever been able to find a virus in any bodily fluid of any person or animal. Ever.

Instead, they use a process to "see" the virus. This process requires that they (a) take a fluid from a sick person, (b) specifically NOT isolate and purify it from other genetic material that is mixed in with it (even though this step is done when studying bacteria, for example, then (c) they ADD to this fluid a mixture of other genetic material (like fetal lung cells and other items), and (d) they ADD chemicals which deprive nutrients, as well as, antibiotics which are specifically designed to kill kidney cells, then (e) they spread this onto monkey kidney cells, (f) they wait a few days for something to happen, and (g) hen the monkey kidney cells die, they claim that it was the virus within that concoction (starting with the bodily fluid) that killed the monkey kidney cells. This is the ONLY "proof" that virologists have EVER used to claim that ANY virus exists.

[In the case of measles, they also drilled a hole into the skull of a monkey, poured a concoction in, and killed the monkey, claiming that the measles virus is what killed the monkey. But, I digress.]

They never stop to consider the possibility that it was actually the antibiotics, which are designed to kill kidney cells, that killed the monkey kidney cells in these experiments. They put the end result under an electron microscope (not a regular microscope), and they take photos of what they see.

What they see in the photos appear to be "spikes" coming out of something. This is referred to as the corona ("crown" in Spanish), and is what virologists claim is "the virus."

They then pay an artist to create artistic renderings of what they think they see, and this is what is published as "proof" of a virus.

But ...

What if it was not a virus at all in the bodily fluid of the sick person that killed the monkey kidney cells? What if it was the process itself that created these spikes (by adding these poisons to the fluid mixture)? What if these spikes are nothing more than ejection of material from the cells when they are poisoned?

This question had never been asked by any virologist, since the 1950's when these original experiments were done.

This has been the ONLY way that virologists "find a virus" for the past 70 years.

But in April 2021, German virologist Stephan Lanka realized there could be a problem here. He did the research to show that you can use (a) a bodily fluid of a sick person, and run it through this process and get the end result that looks like a "virus" ... OR ... (b) you can JUST do the process with NO BODILY FLUID FROM ANY HUMAN OR ANIMAL, and run it through this process, and you get the SAME end result that looks like a "virus."

This proves that the thing that virologists think they are looking at is not a virus from a sick person, but rather is merely the cellular debris kicked out of a dying cell that has been poisoned.

In addition, many attempts have been made for more than 100 years to prove that a sick person with a "virus" can make someone else sick. They have done experiments by taking bodily fluids of sick people (who were thought to be sick due to a virus) and given those fluids to healthy people, by breathing, coughing, snorting, injecting, putting it into their eyeballs, etc.

Yet, not ONE person has ever become sick in these experiments. There is NO PROOF of transmission of sickness.

And now, there is NO PROOF of a "virus" causing these spikes to be produced. They are produced by the PROCESS that virologists used, not by a non-existent virus.

Tom Cowan and Andy Kaufman led the funding for Lanka's 2021 research. They do a great job of explaining it here:

https://rumble.com/vtd2cf-cov-myths-exposed-scientists-prove-sars-cov-2-cov-dont-exist.html

Glad you asked. ;-)

All of virology is based on a scam. Most virologists have not figured this out (yet).

No person has ever been able to find a virus in any bodily fluid of any person or animal. Ever.

Instead, they use a process to "see" the virus. This process requires that they (a) take a fluid from a sick person, (b) specifically NOT isolate and purify it from other genetic material that is mixed in with it (even though this step is done when studying bacteria, for example, then (c) they ADD to this fluid a mixture of other genetic material (like fetal lung cells and other items), and (d) they ADD chemicals which deprive nutrients, as well as, antibiotics which are specifically designed to kill kidney cells, then (e) they spread this onto monkey kidney cells, (f) they wait a few days for something to happen, and (g) hen the monkey kidney cells die, they claim that it was the virus within that concoction (starting with the bodily fluid) that killed the monkey kidney cells. This is the ONLY "proof" that virologists have EVER used to claim that ANY virus exists.

[In the case of measles, they also drilled a hole into the skull of a monkey, poured a concoction in, and killed the monkey, claiming that the measles virus is what killed the monkey. But, I digress.]

They never stop to consider the possibility that it was actually the antibiotics, which are designed to kill kidney cells, that killed the monkey kidney cells in these experiments. They put the end result under an electron microscope (not a regular microscope), and they take photos of what they see.

What they see in the photos appear to be "spikes" coming out of something. This is referred to as the corona ("crown" in Spanish), and is what virologists claim is "the virus."

They then pay an artist to create artistic renderings of what they think they see, and this is what is published as "proof" of a virus.

But ...

What if it was not a virus at all in the bodily fluid of the sick person that killed the monkey kidney cells? What if it was the process that created these spikes? What if these spikes are nothing more than ejection of material from the cells when they are poisoned?

This question had never been asked by any virologist, since the 1950's when these original experiments were done.

This has been the ONLY way that virologists "find a virus" for the past 70 years.

But in April 2021, German virologist Stephan Lanka realized there could be a problem here. He did the research to show that you can use (a) a bodily fluid of a sick person, and run it through this process and get the end result that looks like a "virus" ... OR ... (b) you can JUST do the process with NO BODILY FLUID FROM ANY HUMAN OR ANIMAL, and run it through this process, and you get the SAME end result that looks like a "virus."

This proves that the thing that virologists think they are looking at is not a virus from a sick person, but rather is merely the cellular debris kicked out of a dying cell that has been poisoned.

In addition, many attempts have been made for more than 100 years to prove that a sick person with a "virus" can make someone else sick. They have done experiments by taking bodily fluids of sick people (who were thought to be sick due to a virus) and given those fluids to healthy people, by breathing, coughing, snorting, injecting, putting it into their eyeballs, etc.

Yet, not ONE person has ever become sick in these experiments. There is NO PROOF of transmission of sickness.

And now, there is NO PROOF of a "virus" causing these spikes to be produced. They are produced by the PROCESS that virologists used, not by a non-existent virus.

Tom Cowan and Andy Kaufman led the funding for Lanka's 2021 research. They do a great job of explaining it here:

https://rumble.com/vtd2cf-cov-myths-exposed-scientists-prove-sars-cov-2-cov-dont-exist.html

Glad you asked. ;-)

All of virology is based on a scam. Most virologists have not figured this out (yet).

No person has ever been able to find a virus in any bodily fluid of any person or animal. Ever.

Instead, they use a process to "see" the virus. This process requires that they (a) take a fluid from a sick person, (b) NOT isolate and purify it from other genetic material that is mixed in with it, (c) then ADD to this fluid a mixture of other genetic material (like fetal lung cells and other items), as well as antibiotics which are designed to kill kidney cells, specifically, (d) then they spread this onto monkey kidney cells, (e) wait a few days for something to happen, (f) and then when the monkey kidney cells die, they claim that it was the virus within that concoction that killed them.

They never stop to consider the possibility that it was the antibiotics, designed to kill kidney cells, that actually killed the monkey kidney cells. They put the end result under an electron microscope (not a regular microscope), and they take photos of what they see.

What they see in the photos appear to be "spikes" coming out of something. This is referred to as the corona ("crown" in Spanish), and is what virologists claim is "the virus."

They then pay an artist to create artistic renderings of what they think they see, and this is what is published as "proof" of a virus.

But ...

What if it was not a virus at all in the bodily fluid of the sick person that killed the monkey kidney cells? What if it was the process that created these spikes? What if these spikes are nothing more than ejection of material from the cells when they are poisoned?

This question had never been asked by any virologist, since the 1950's when these original experiments were done.

This has been the ONLY way that virologists "find a virus" for the past 70 years.

But in April 2021, German virologist Stephan Lanka realized there could be a problem here. He did the research to show that you can use (a) a bodily fluid of a sick person, and run it through this process and get the end result that looks like a "virus" ... OR ... (b) you can JUST do the process with NO BODILY FLUID FROM ANY HUMAN OR ANIMAL, and run it through this process, and you get the SAME end result that looks like a "virus."

This proves that the thing that virologists think they are looking at is not a virus from a sick person, but rather is merely the cellular debris kicked out of a dying cell that has been poisoned.

In addition, many attempts have been made for more than 100 years to prove that a sick person with a "virus" can make someone else sick. They have done experiments by taking bodily fluids of sick people (who were thought to be sick due to a virus) and given those fluids to healthy people, by breathing, coughing, snorting, injecting, putting it into their eyeballs, etc.

Yet, not ONE person has ever become sick in these experiments. There is NO PROOF of transmission of sickness.

And now, there is NO PROOF of a "virus" causing these spikes to be produced. They are produced by the PROCESS that virologists used, not by a non-existent virus.

Tom Cowan and Andy Kaufman led the funding for Lanka's 2021 research. They do a great job of explaining it here:

https://rumble.com/vtd2cf-cov-myths-exposed-scientists-prove-sars-cov-2-cov-dont-exist.html