do you really think they emailed out messages about Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, Mike Huckabee with the same level of tenacity?
OK. This is reasoning, logic, but it's not evidence based. We should be applying reason, logic, along with evidence, empirical data and facts.
Is having emails on campaigners, as smartbaum queries, unusual? That's also logical and reason based.
So what is missing here is the empirical data. pedes really should be careful to apply proper critical thinking, instead of just applying a bias with logic and thinking it's valid or factual.
Edit: I'm not disagreeing with the premise that the Cabalites were paying special attention to DJT, only that the presence of this particular email is significant evidence that they did. It's one email among (a lot) apparently.
do you really think they emailed out messages about Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, Mike Huckabee with the same level of tenacity?
OK. This is reasoning, logic, but it's not evidence based. We should be applying reason, logic, along with evidence, empirical data and facts.
Is having emails on campaigners, as smartbaum queries, unusual? That's also logical and reason based.
So what is missing here is the empirical data. pedes really should be careful to apply proper critical thinking, instead of just applying a bias with logic and thinking it's valid or factual.
Edit: I'm not disagreeing with the premise that the Cabalites were paying special attention to DJT, only that the presence of this particular email is significant evidence that their did. It's one email among (a lot) apparently.
do you really think they emailed out messages about Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, Mike Huckabee with the same level of tenacity?
OK. This is reasoning, logic, but it's not evidence based. We should be applying reason, logic, along with evidence, empirical data and facts.
Is having emails on campaigners, as smartbaum queries, unusual? That's also logical and reason based.
So what is missing here is the empirical data. pedes really should be careful to apply proper critical thinking, instead of just applying a bias with logic and thinking it's valid or factual.