Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

IMO The leader of the Party was leading....endorsing Oz. Many ignored him, so what was left was an unfocused mess....possibly allowing the worst globalist McConnell/McCormick in.

McCormick is McConnell's boy. The Club for Growth is McConnell's hammer....and they supported both McCormick AND Barnette....splitting the vote...possibly allowing Mitch's guy to win.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

IMO The leader of the Party was leading....endorsing Oz. Many ignored him, so what was left was an unfocused mess....possibly allowing the worst globalist McConnell/McCormick in.

Some thought they had the big picture....now Oz could have been 10k vote ahead, instead Barnette siphoned maga votes.

Any maga knows McCormick is McConnell's boy. The Club for Growth is McConnell's hammer....and they supported both McCormick AND Barnette....splitting the vote...possibly allowing Mitch's guy to win.

There was a strategy, and personal "discernment," or ignoring the plan....was not it.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

IMO The leader of the Party was leading....endorsing Oz. Many ignored him, so what was left was an unfocused mess....possibly allowing the worst globalist McConnell/McCormick in.

Some thought they had the big picture....now Oz could have been 10k vote ahead, instead Barnette siphoned maga votes.

Any maga knows McCormick is McConnell's boy. The Club for Growth is McConnell's hammer....and they back McCormick AND Barnette....splitting the vote...possibly allowing Mitch's guy to win.

2 years ago
1 score