Consider in your evaluation...
Barr's response is scripted to resonate positively with the insurgency, negatively with the counterinsurgency.
Insurgents will go further down the rabbit hole of cognitive dissonance if they have not seen (and Mamet principle any effort to see) 2000 Mules.
Counterinsurgents, most having only watched 2000 Mules one time, will either watch it again, now Q'd to Barr's criticism of analysis of the geo-fencing / geo locating and tracking data which is not buttressed by corresponding film) and reports like this from VoterGA.com addressing the lack of video monitoring of drop boxes to be able to conduct the kind of data to image correlation Barr muses is missing...
and re-watching the 11 May 2022 Charlie Kirk interview (among others)
https://youtu.be/XhojcluNkaE?t=23
to hear Philips and Englebrecht explain how they had just begun exploiting the video footage that they have been able to recover.
Or... already know Barr's statements are misleading for a reason.
Barr's role in this instance, is very much like a juror in the Depp Vs Heard defamation case... shortly after having heard the video deposition of Depp's Washington DC lawyer (seeing a pattern here), Adam Waldman (responsible for the press statements in The Sun that are basis for Heard's counter defamation lawsuit against Depp) who answered attorney-client privilege 98% of the time under questioning from Heard's lawyer, when Heard's attorney put an expert (many might say "the expert") on computer/internet communications analysis and was shut down (sustained objection) the moment the word "Bot" came out of Heard's attorney's mouth. Juror is clueless as to why the word "Bot" was objected to. Barr is playing a role and delivering lines, and knows exactly what a Depp Vs Heard juror was prevented from hearing from "the expert" witness.
What was about to be testified to was the Payola Scheme infrastructure of Twitter, Facebook, etc. that is used by cut-out attorneys with their license to lie to defame and destroy whoever has the $ to do so. All a part of the gaslighting of America. Ever watch a movie that is critically slammed and does lousy at the box office that you think and feel to be one of the best films you have ever seen? What was the subject.?
For the Q adept, watch The Spanish Prisoner, written and directed by David Mamet. Or REDBELT... same
Found it a rather interesting coincidence that the most high profile culturally entertaining trial (Depp Vs Heard) and the most high profile politically entertaining trial (U.S. Government Vs Sussmann) in the last decade both on 26 May 2022 (Thursday) saw the arguments end and jury instructions finalized and then the jury charged and closing summary arguments on 27 May 2022. Interesting coincidence, eh.
Culture and politics.
https://youtu.be/Of_jyeDZ3Sg?t=8
Barr also said this...
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
On another "note"...
Consider in your evaluation...
Barr's response is scripted to resonate positively with the insurgency, negatively with the counterinsurgency.
Insurgents will go further down the rabbit hole of cognitive dissonance if they have not seen (and Mamet principle any effort to see) 2000 Mules.
Counterinsurgents, most having only watched 2000 Mules one time, will either watch it again, now Q'd to Barr's criticism of analysis of the geo-fencing / geo locating and tracking data which is not buttressed by corresponding film) and reports like this from VoterGA.com addressing the lack of video monitoring of drop boxes to be able to conduct the kind of data to image correlation Barr muses is missing...
and re-watching the 11 May 2022 Charlie Kirk interview (among others)
https://youtu.be/XhojcluNkaE?t=23
to hear Philips and Englebrecht explain how they had just begun exploiting the video footage that they have been able to recover.
Or... already know Barr's statements are misleading for a reason.
Barr's role in this instance, is very much like a juror in the Depp Vs Heard defamation case... shortly after having heard the video deposition of Depp's Washington DC lawyer (seeing a pattern here), Adam Waldman (responsible for the press statements in The Sun that are basis for Heard's counter defamation lawsuit against Depp) who answered attorney-client privilege 98% of the time under questioning from Heard's lawyer, when Heard's attorney put an expert (many might say "the expert") on computer/internet communications analysis and was shut down (sustained objection) the moment the word "Bot" came out of Heard's attorney's mouth. Juror is clueless as to why the word "Bot" was objected to. Barr is playing a role and delivering lines, and knows exactly what a Depp Vs Heard juror was prevented from hearing from "the expert" witness.
What was about to be testified to was the Payola Scheme infrastructure of Twitter, Facebook, etc. that is used by cut-out attorneys with their license to lie to defame and destroy whoever has the $ to do so. All a part of the gaslighting of America. Ever watch a movie that is critically slammed and does lousy at the box office that you think and feel to be one of the best films you have ever seen? What was the subject.?
For the Q adept, watch The Spanish Prisoner, written and directed by David Mamet. Or REDBELT... same
Found it a rather interesting coincidence that the most high profile culturally entertaining trial (Depp Vs Heard) and the most high profile politically entertaining trial (U.S. Government Vs Sussmann) in the last decade both on 26 May 2022 (Thursday) saw the arguments end and juries charged and then heard closing summary arguments on 27 May 2022. Interesting coincidence, eh.
https://youtu.be/Of_jyeDZ3Sg?t=8
Barr also said this...
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
On another "note"...
Consider in your evaluation...
Barr's response is scripted to resonate positively with the insurgency, negatively with the counterinsurgency.
Insurgents will go further down the rabbit hole of cognitive dissonance if they have not seen (and Mamet principle any effort to see) 2000 Mules.
Counterinsurgents, most having only watched 2000 Mules one time, will either watch it again, now Q'd to Barr's criticism of analysis of the geo-fencing / geo locating and tracking data which is not buttressed by corresponding film) and reports like this from VoterGA.com addressing the lack of video monitoring of drop boxes to be able to conduct the kind of data to image correlation Barr muses is missing...
and re-watching the 11 May 2022 Charlie Kirk interview (among others)
https://youtu.be/XhojcluNkaE?t=23
to hear Philips and Englebrecht explain how they had just begun exploiting the video footage that they have been able to recover.
Or... already know Barr's statements are misleading for a reason.
Barr's role in this instance, is very much like a juror in the Depp Vs Heard defamation case... shortly after having heard the video deposition of Depp's Washington DC lawyer (seeing a pattern here), Adam Waldman (responsible for the press statements in The Sun that are basis for Heard's counter defamation lawsuit against Depp) who answered attorney-client privilege 98% of the time under questioning from Heard's lawyer, when Heard's attorney put an expert (many might say "the expert") on computer/internet communications analysis and was shut down (sustained objection) the moment the "Bot" came out of Heard's attorney's mouth. Juror is clueless as to why the work "Bot" was objected to. Barr is playing a role and delivering lines, and knows exactly what a Depp Vs Heard juror was prevented from hearing from "the expert" witness.
What was about to be testified to was the Payola Scheme infrastructure of Twitter, Facebook, etc. that is used by cut-out attorneys with their license to lie to defame and destroy whoever has the $ to do so. All a part of the gaslighting of America. Ever watch a movie that is critically slammed and does lousy at the box office that you think and feel to be one of the best films you have ever seen? What was the subject.?
For the Q adept, watch The Spanish Prisoner, written and directed by David Mamet. Or REDBELT... same
Found it a rather interesting coincidence that the most high profile culturally entertaining trial (Depp Vs Heard) and the most high profile politically entertaining trial (U.S. Government Vs Sussmann) in the last decade both on 26 May 2022 (Thursday) saw the arguments end and juries charged and then heard closing summary arguments on 27 May 2022. Interesting coincidence, eh.
https://youtu.be/Of_jyeDZ3Sg?t=8
Barr also said this...
/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
On another "note"...
Consider in your evaluation...
Barr's response is scripted to resonate positively with the insurgency, negatively with the counterinsurgency.
Insurgents will go further down the rabbit hole of cognitive dissonance if they have not seen (and Mamet principle any effort to see) 2000 Mules.
Counterinsurgents, most having only watched 2000 Mules one time, will either watch it again, now Q'd to Barr's criticism of analysis of the geo-fencing / geo locating and tracking data which is not buttressed by corresponding film) and reports like this from VoterGA.com addressing the lack of video monitoring of drop boxes to be able to conduct the kind of data to image correlation Barr muses is missing...
and re-watching the 11 May 2022 Charlie Kirk interview (among others)
https://youtu.be/XhojcluNkaE?t=23
to hear Philips and Englebrecht explain how they had just begun exploiting the video footage that they have been able to recover.
Barr in this instance, is very much like a juror in the Depp Vs Heard defamation case... shortly after having heard the video deposition of Depp's Washington DC lawyer (seeing a pattern here), Adam Waldman (responsible for the press statements in The Sun that are basis for Heard's counter defamation lawsuit against Depp) who answered attorney-client privilege 98% of the time under questioning from Heard's lawyer, when Heard's attorney put an expert (many might say "the expert") on computer/internet communications analysis and was shut down (sustained objection) the moment the "Bot" came out of Heard's attorney's mouth.
What was about to be testified to was the Payola Scheme infrastructure of Twitter, Facebook, etc. that is used by cut-out attorneys with their license to lie to defame and destroy whoever has the $ to do so. All a part of the gaslighting of America. Ever watch a movie that is critically slammed and does lousy at the box office that you think and feel to be one of the best films you have ever seen? What was the subject.?
For the Q adept, watch The Spanish Prisoner, written and directed by David Mamet. Or REDBELT... same
Found it a rather interesting coincidence that the most high profile culturally entertaining trial (Depp Vs Heard) and the most high profile politically entertaining trial (U.S. Government Vs Sussmann) in the last decade both on 26 May 2022 (Thursday) saw the arguments end and juries charged and then heard closing summary arguments on 27 May 2022. Interesting coincidence, eh.
Barr also said this...
https://youtu.be/9ySJKilHUeI (not all drops / links for anons)