The equtorial bulge is not something we are "taught"

Of course it is! I think you mean to say it is not just something we are taught and not something we are taught with no justification / supporting evidence.

it is something that can be measured

If it were real, I agree it could (and must) be!

It also affects the precession of satellite orbits.

I prefer to keep the conversation a bit more “down to earth”, and avoid such abject appeals to authority (as an independent researcher and student). Surely we need not appeal to satellite orbits to measure this supposed bulge - right?

As a result of all this observation, the world is not flat and stationary.

That largely has to do with interpretation of the observations, not the observations themselves! Though I am not certain of the entire shape of the world, I have concluded (based on said observations) that it is both not spherical the way we are taught, and it is (largely) stationary.

Calling it a "pseudoforce" is your gaffe.

The coriolis effect does not involve any actual acceleration of any kind (except that of, at least, one of the reference frames of course). It is to do with differing reference frames. I encourage you to read about it, though there is a lot of conflation of the two things out there (as I said, it is woefully taught). Actual deflection caused by acceleration due to actual rotation is just that (in physics)! Coriolis is the illusion thereof due to differing reference frame!

You have no scientific credentials.

True!

You wear your ignorance proudly on your sleeve

True! As we all should! How else will others know of our ignorance and be able to share their knowledge to help dispel us of it (ideally) ?!

Or do you subscribe to the radical paranoid view that nothing can be trusted?

Lol. I largely side with the spooks; “Trust, but verify!”. The burden to thoroughly validate all information before accepting it as correct/true always falls on the student! Sadly conditioning through rote under the guise of education from childhood is not conducive to recognizing that!

If that is the case, how can you possibly trust the Bible?

I trust no book (nor any source) blindly, nor should I! However, I have found truth within it, as well as many lies. As I said - trust (if you wish), but verify! The scriptures are to be tried as a blacksmith tries gold.

What you are leaving out of consideration is that if any of this is false, it would show up rapidly as a collision of engineering theory and engineering fact. It doesn't.

Quite the opposite! I have (and do) consider it a great deal! It will take little more than time and your interest to understand why, and what I mean. There is no conflict, inherent or otherwise - there merely appears to be due to your perspective (a “coriolis effect” of concept, if you will)

I guess you don't understand any astronomy, either

Many flat earth researchers, such as myself, were/are lovers of science. I have a keen interest in astronomy and understand it pretty well. I also had a keen interest in theosophy, and the contradictions between the two disciplines! Before you can understand why I make these wildly heretical statements, we will need to discuss what science is (in order to discern what is and is not science) - assuming you are interested in learning more about my perspective.

The whole day-night cycle is impossible for a flat Earth.

This is a common misconception. I look forward to discussing other alternatives that you have likely not considered/encountered before, assuming you are interested!

Facts are put to the test in all of our technology, which would not work if there were any gap between theory and reality

There is always gap between those two things and often that gap is very large. We don’t have to understand or be correct about our understanding in order to build and/or do things! Someone once told me “It is the function that matters”. The pudding is tasty even (and perhaps especially!) when we don’t understand the steps we take to make it.

It is not only a matter of learning. It is a matter of constantly putting it to the test.

I could not have said it better myself!

What you are saying has no material foundation at all.

I assure you, it is quite the opposite. But it will take time and your interest in order to convey why/how that is!

You are missing out on a lot, because most of modern technology relies on principles and facts that you reject out of hand.

You misunderstand me! Partially this is encouraged by the flat earth psyop and its useful idiots. They often loudly reject science to encourage you to mistakenly believe that all who study this subject, or conclude “heretical” things, must do the same. As I said, it is quite the opposite!

No, there is little for us to discuss

If you insist, however from my perspective our discussion is large, varied, and just beginning!

You are very hard down on a paranoid delusion that all of this is a fable or a fake.

I understand why you feel this way, but you are not describing/criticizing my perspective but a strawman of it of your imagination. To learn my perspective will merely take your time and interest! Assuming you are interested, we have much to talk about!

The equtorial bulge is not something we are "taught"

Of course it is! I think you mean to say it is not just something we are taught and not something we are taught with no justification / supporting evidence.

it is something that can be measured

If it were real, I agree it could (and must) be!

It also affects the precession of satellite orbits.

I prefer to keep the conversation a bit more “down to earth”, and avoid such abject appeals to authority (as an independent researcher and student). Surely we need not appeal to satellite orbits to measure this supposed bulge - right?

As a result of all this observation, the world is not flat and stationary.

That largely has to do with interpretation of the observations, not the observations themselves! Though I am not certain of the entire shape of the world, I have concluded (based on said observations) that it is both not spherical the way we are taught, and it is (largely) stationary.

Calling it a "pseudoforce" is your gaffe.

The coriolis effect does not involve any actual acceleration of any kind. It is to do with differing reference frames. I encourage you to read about it, though there is a lot of conflation of the two things out there (as I said, it is woefully taught). Actual deflection cause by acceleration due to actual rotation is just that (in physics)! Coriolis is the illusion thereof due to differing reference frame!

You have no scientific credentials.

True!

You wear your ignorance proudly on your sleeve

True! As we all should! How else will others know of our ignorance and be able to share their knowledge to help dispel us of it (ideally) ?!

Or do you subscribe to the radical paranoid view that nothing can be trusted?

Lol. I largely side with the spooks; “Trust, but verify!”. The burden to thoroughly validate all information before accepting it as correct/true always falls on the student! Sadly conditioning through rote under the guise of education from childhood is not conducive to recognizing that!

If that is the case, how can you possibly trust the Bible?

I trust no book (nor any source) blindly, nor should I! However, I have found truth within it, as well as many lies. As I said - trust (if you wish), but verify! The scriptures are to be tried as a blacksmith tries gold.

What you are leaving out of consideration is that if any of this is false, it would show up rapidly as a collision of engineering theory and engineering fact. It doesn't.

Quite the opposite! I have (and do) consider it a great deal! It will take little more than time and your interest to understand why, and what I mean. There is no conflict, inherent or otherwise - there merely appears to be due to your perspective (a “coriolis effect” of concept, if you will)

I guess you don't understand any astronomy, either

Many flat earth researchers, such as myself, were/are lovers of science. I have a keen interest in astronomy and understand it pretty well. I also had a keen interest in theosophy, and the contradictions between the two disciplines! Before you can understand why I make these wildly heretical statements, we will need to discuss what science is (in order to discern what is and is not science) - assuming you are interested in learning more about my perspective.

The whole day-night cycle is impossible for a flat Earth.

This is a common misconception. I look forward to discussing other alternatives that you have likely not considered/encountered before, assuming you are interested!

Facts are put to the test in all of our technology, which would not work if there were any gap between theory and reality

There is always gap between those two things and often that gap is very large. We don’t have to understand or be correct about our understanding in order to build and/or do things! Someone once told me “It is the function that matters”. The pudding is tasty even (and perhaps especially!) when we don’t understand the steps we take to make it.

It is not only a matter of learning. It is a matter of constantly putting it to the test.

I could not have said it better myself!

What you are saying has no material foundation at all.

I assure you, it is quite the opposite. But it will take time and your interest in order to convey why/how that is!

You are missing out on a lot, because most of modern technology relies on principles and facts that you reject out of hand.

You misunderstand me! Partially this is encouraged by the flat earth psyop and its useful idiots. They often loudly reject science to encourage you to mistakenly believe that all who study this subject, or conclude “heretical” things, must do the same. As I said, it is quite the opposite!

No, there is little for us to discuss

If you insist, however from my perspective our discussion is large, varied, and just beginning!

You are very hard down on a paranoid delusion that all of this is a fable or a fake.

I understand why you feel this way, but you are not describing/criticizing my perspective but a strawman of it of your imagination. To learn my perspective will merely take your time and interest! Assuming you are interested, we have much to talk about!

The equtorial bulge is not something we are "taught"

Of course it is! I think you mean to say it is not just something we are taught and not something we are taught with no justification / supporting evidence.

it is something that can be measured

If it were real, I agree it could (and must) be!

It also affects the precession of satellite orbits.

I prefer to keep the conversation a bit more “down to earth”, and avoid such abject appeals to authority (as an independent researcher and student). Surely we need not appeal to satellite orbits to measure this supposed bulge - right?

As a result of all this observation, the world is not flat and stationary.

That largely has to do with interpretation of the observations, not the observations themselves! Though I am not certain of the entire shape of the world, I have concluded (based on said observations) that it is both not spherical the way we are taught, and it is (largely) stationary.

Calling it a "pseudoforce" is your gaffe.

The coriolis effect does not involve any actual acceleration of any kind. It is to do with differing reference frames. I encourage you to read about it, though there is a lot of conflation of the two things out there (as I said, it is woefully taught). Actual deflection cause by acceleration due to actual rotation is just that (in physics)! Coriolis is the illusion thereof due to differing reference frame!

You have no scientific credentials.

True!

You wear your ignorance proudly on your sleeve

True! As we all should! How else will others know of our ignorance and be able to share their knowledge to help dispel us of it (ideally) ?!

Or do you subscribe to the radical paranoid view that nothing can be trusted?

Lol. I largely side with the spooks; “Trust, but verify!”. The burden to thoroughly validate all information before accepting it as correct/true always falls on the student! Sadly conditioning through rote under the guise of education from childhood is not conducive to recognizing that!

If that is the case, how can you possibly trust the Bible?

I trust no book blindly, nor should I! However, I have found truth within it, as well as many lies. As I said - trust (if you wish), but verify! The scriptures are to be tried as a blacksmith tries gold.

What you are leaving out of consideration is that if any of this is false, it would show up rapidly as a collision of engineering theory and engineering fact. It doesn't.

Quite the opposite! I have (and do) consider it a great deal! It will take little more than time and your interest to understand why, and what I mean. There is no conflict, inherent or otherwise - there merely appears to be due to your perspective (a “coriolis effect” of concept, if you will)

I guess you don't understand any astronomy, either

Many flat earth researchers, such as myself, were/are lovers of science. I have a keen interest in astronomy and understand it pretty well. I also had a keen interest in theosophy, and the contradictions between the two disciplines! Before you can understand why I make these wildly heretical statements, we will need to discuss what science is (in order to discern what is and is not science) - assuming you are interested in learning more about my perspective.

The whole day-night cycle is impossible for a flat Earth.

This is a common misconception. I look forward to discussing other alternatives that you have likely not considered/encountered before, assuming you are interested!

Facts are put to the test in all of our technology, which would not work if there were any gap between theory and reality

There is always gap between those two things and often that gap is very large. We don’t have to understand or be correct about our understanding in order to build and/or do things! Someone once told me “It is the function that matters”. The pudding is tasty even (and perhaps especially!) when we don’t understand the steps we take to make it.

It is not only a matter of learning. It is a matter of constantly putting it to the test.

I could not have said it better myself!

What you are saying has no material foundation at all.

I assure you, it is quite the opposite. But it will take time and your interest in order to convey why/how that is!

You are missing out on a lot, because most of modern technology relies on principles and facts that you reject out of hand.

You misunderstand me! Partially this is encouraged by the flat earth psyop and its useful idiots. They often loudly reject science to encourage you to mistakenly believe that all who study this subject, or conclude “heretical” things, must do the same. As I said, it is quite the opposite!

No, there is little for us to discuss

If you insist, however from my perspective our discussion is large, varied, and just beginning!

You are very hard down on a paranoid delusion that all of this is a fable or a fake.

I understand why you feel this way, but you are not describing/criticizing my perspective but a strawman of it of your imagination. To learn my perspective will merely take your time and interest! Assuming you are interested, we have much to talk about!