Once created, government CAN create "civil rights," which are rights that are really privileges
What is a "civil right" except an attempt to limit inalienable rights or empower the government and create two classes of citizen?
For example, the 5th amendment:
nor shall any person ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
The eminent domain clause creates two classes of people. The first class is the governors, who can steal your property, i.e. the real and only legal owners of property (because they can take it whenever they feel like it, which is the definition of a Sovereign AKA Ruler AKA Ultimate Authority). The second class is the governed, AKA the vassals (or slaves) who use the land at the pleasure of the Authority (and only so long as they pay their Lease AKA Tax to their Sovereign).
This of course is a fraud, and almost certainly added by the Banker class, who ultimately own everything. This is why the IRS can come and take your property whenever the fuck they want just on suspicion of a "tax crime" which is so loosely defined as to be laughable.
There can be no "civil" government (of, by, and for the people) if there are two classes of citizens. There can be no true We The People if the fraud of Sovereignty is bolstered (or contrarily, if Individual Sovereignty, which is a God Given Right is nullified) by law. While the Right to Property may not be a "God Given Right", it is intrinsic in Sovereignty as it is defined civilly, and thus there can be no non-fraudulent government that can take property away from an individual for any reason other than as an act of war (one Sovereign acting against another).
P.S. This applies to anything you own, not just land; like your car, or your gun, or your drugs, or any of your property. ALL ownership regulation is fraudulent.
Once created, government CAN create "civil rights," which are rights that are really privileges
What is a "civil right" except an attempt to limit inalienable rights or empower the government and create two classes of citizen?
For example, the 5th amendment:
nor shall any person ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
The eminent domain clause creates two classes of people. The first class is the governors, who can steal your property, i.e. the real and only legal owners of property (because they can take it whenever they feel like it, which is the definition of a Sovereign AKA Ruler AKA Ultimate Authority). The second class is the governed, AKA the vassals (or slaves) who use the land at the pleasure of the Authority (and only so long as they pay their Lease AKA Tax to their Sovereign).
This of course is a fraud, and almost certainly added by the Banker class, who ultimately own everything. This is why the IRS can come and take your property whenever the fuck they want just on suspicion of a "tax crime" which is so loosely defined as to be laughable.
There can be no "civil" government (of, by, and for the people) if there are two classes of citizens. There can be no true We The People if the fraud of Sovereignty is bolstered (or contrarily, if Individual Sovereignty, which is a God Given Right is nullified) by law. While the Right to Property may not be a "God Given Right", it is intrinsic in Sovereignty as it is defined civilly, and thus there can be no non-fraudulent government that can take property away from an individual for any reason other than as an act of war (one Sovereign acting against another).
P.S. This applies to anything you own, not just land; like your car, or your gun, etc.
Once created, government CAN create "civil rights," which are rights that are really privileges
What is a "civil right" except an attempt to limit inalienable rights or empower the government and create two classes of citizen?
For example, the 5th amendment:
nor shall any person ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
The eminent domain clause creates two classes of people. The first class is the governors, who can steal your property, i.e. the real and only owners of property (because they can take it whenever they feel like it, which is the definition of a Sovereign AKA Ruler AKA Ultimate Authority). The second class is the governed, AKA the vassals (or slaves) who use the land at the pleasure of the Authority (and only so long as they pay their Lease AKA Tax to their Sovereign).
This of course is a fraud, and almost certainly added by the Banker class, who ultimately own everything. This is why the IRS can come and take your property whenever the fuck they want just on suspicion of a "tax crime" which is so loosely defined as to be laughable.
There can be no "civil" government (of, by, and for the people) if there are two classes of citizens. There can be no true We The People if the fraud of Sovereignty is bolstered (or contrarily, if Individual Sovereignty, which is a God Given Right is nullified) by law. While the Right to Property may not be a "God Given Right", it is intrinsic in Sovereignty as it is defined civilly, and thus there can be no non-fraudulent government that can take property away from an individual for any reason other than as an act of war (one Sovereign acting against another).
P.S. This applies to anything you own, not just land; like your car, or your gun, etc.
Once created, government CAN create "civil rights," which are rights that are really privileges
What is a "civil right" except an attempt to limit inalienable rights or empower the government and create two classes of citizen?
For example, the 5th amendment:
nor shall any person ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
The eminent domain clause creates two classes of people. The first class is the governors, who can steal your property, i.e. the real and only owners of property (because they can take it whenever they feel like it, which is the definition of a Sovereign AKA Ruler AKA Ultimate Authority). The second class is the governed, AKA the vassals (or slaves) who use the land at the pleasure of the Authority (and only so long as they pay their Lease AKA Tax to their Sovereign).
This of course is a fraud, and almost certainly added by the Banker class, who ultimately own everything. This is why the IRS can come and take your property whenever the fuck they want just on suspicion of a "tax crime" which is so loosely defined as to be laughable.
There can be no "civil" government (of, by, and for the people) if there are two classes of citizens. There can be no true We The People if the fraud of Sovereignty is bolstered (or contrarily, if Individual Sovereignty, which is a God Given Right is nullified) by law. While the Right to Property may not be a "God Given Right", it is intrinsic in Sovereignty as it is defined civilly, and thus there can be no non-fraudulent government that can take property away from an individual for any reason other than as an act of war (one Sovereign acting against another).
P.S. This also applies to anything you own, not just land; like your car, or your gun, etc.
Once created, government CAN create "civil rights," which are rights that are really privileges
What is a "civil right" except an attempt to limit inalienable rights or empower the government and create two classes of citizen?
For example, the 5th amendment:
nor shall any person ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
The eminent domain clause creates two classes of people. The first class is the governors, who can steal your property, i.e. the real and only owners of property (because they can take it whenever they feel like it, which is the definition of a Sovereign AKA Ruler AKA Ultimate Authority). The second class is the governed, AKA the vassals (or slaves) who use the land at the pleasure of the Authority (and only so long as they pay their Lease AKA Tax to their Sovereign).
This of course is a fraud, and almost certainly added by the Banker class, who ultimately own everything. This is why the IRS can come and take your property whenever the fuck they want just on suspicion of a "tax crime" which is so loosely defined as to be laughable.
There can be no "civil" government (of, by, and for the people) if there are two classes of citizens. There can be no true We The People if the fraud of Sovereignty is bolstered (or contrarily, if Individual Sovereignty, which is a God Given Right is nullified) by law. While the Right to Property may not be a "God Given Right", it is intrinsic in Sovereignty as it is defined civilly, and thus there can be no non-fraudulent government that can take property away from an individual for any reason other than as an act of war (one Sovereign acting against another).
P.S. This also applies to anything else you own, like your car, or your gun, etc.
Once created, government CAN create "civil rights," which are rights that are really privileges
What is a "civil right" except an attempt to limit inalienable rights or empower the government and create two classes of citizen?
For example, the 5th amendment:
nor shall any person ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
The eminent domain clause creates two classes of people. The first class is the governors, who can steal your property, i.e. the real and only owners of property (because they can take it whenever they feel like it, which is the definition of a Sovereign AKA Ruler AKA Ultimate Authority). The second class is the governed, AKA the vassals (or slaves) who use the land at the pleasure of the Authority (and only so long as they pay their Lease AKA Tax to their Sovereign).
This of course is a fraud, and almost certainly added by the Banker class, who ultimately own everything. This is why the IRS can come and take your property whenever the fuck they want just on suspicion of a "tax crime" which is so loosely defined as to be laughable.
There can be no "civil" government (of, by, and for the people) if there are two classes of citizens. There can be no true We The People if the fraud of Sovereignty is bolstered (or contrarily, if Individual Sovereignty, which is a God Given Right is nullified) by law. While the Right to Property may not be a "God Given Right", it is intrinsic in Sovereignty as it is defined civilly, and thus there can be no non-fraudulent government that can take property away from an individual for any reason other than as an act of war (one Sovereign acting against another).
Once created, government CAN create "civil rights," which are rights that are really privileges
What is a "civil right" except an attempt to limit inalienable rights or empower the government and create two classes of citizen?
For example, the 5th amendment:
nor shall any person ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
The eminent domain clause creates two classes of people. The governors, who can steal your property, i.e. the real and only owners of property (because they can take it whenever they feel like it, which is the definition of a Sovereign AKA Ruler AKA Ultimate Authority), and the governed, AKA the vassals (or slaves) who use the land at the pleasure of the Authority (and only so long as they pay their Lease AKA Tax to their Sovereign).
This of course is a fraud, and almost certainly added by the Banker class, who ultimately own everything. This is why the IRS can come and take your property whenever the fuck they want just on suspicion of a "tax crime" which is so loosely defined as to be laughable.
There can be no "civil" government (of, by, and for the people) if there are two classes of citizens. There can be no true We The People if the fraud of Sovereignty is bolstered (or contrarily, if Individual Sovereignty, which is a God Given Right is nullified) by law. While the Right to Property may not be a "God Given Right", it is intrinsic in Sovereignty as it is defined civilly, and thus there can be no non-fraudulent government that can take property away from an individual for any reason other than as an act of war (one Sovereign acting against another).
Once created, government CAN create "civil rights," which are rights that are really privileges
What is a "civil right" except an attempt to limit inalienable rights or empower the government and create two classes of citizen?
For example, the 5th amendment:
nor shall any person ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
The eminent domain clause creates two classes of people. The governors, who can steal your property, i.e. the real and only owners of property (because they can take it whenever they feel like it, which is the definition of a Sovereign AKA Ruler AKA Ultimate Authority), and the governed, AKA the vassals (or slaves) who use the land at the pleasure of the Authority.
This of course is a fraud, and almost certainly added by the Banker class, who ultimately own everything. This is why the IRS can come and take your property whenever the fuck they want just on suspicion of a "tax crime" which is so loosely defined as to be laughable.
There can be no "civil" government (of, by, and for the people) if there are two classes of citizens. There can be no true We The People if the fraud of Sovereignty is bolstered (or contrarily, if Individual Sovereignty, which is a God Given Right is nullified) by law. While the Right to Property may not be a "God Given Right", it is intrinsic in Sovereignty as it is defined civilly, and thus there can be no non-fraudulent government that can take property away from an individual for any reason other than as an act of war (one Sovereign acting against another).
Once created, government CAN create "civil rights," which are rights that are really privileges
What is a "civil right" except an attempt to limit inalienable rights or empower the government and create two classes of citizen?
For example, the 5th amendment:
nor shall any person ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
The eminent domain clause creates two classes of people. The governors, who can steal your property, i.e. the real and only owners of property (because they can take it whenever they feel like it, which is the definition of a Sovereign AKA Ruler AKA Ultimate Authority), and the governed, AKA the vassals (or slaves).
This of course is a fraud, and almost certainly added by the Banker class, who ultimately own everything. This is why the IRS can come and take your property whenever the fuck they want just on suspicion of a "tax crime" which is so loosely defined as to be laughable.
There can be no "civil" government (of, by, and for the people) if there are two classes of citizens. There can be no true We The People if the fraud of Sovereignty is bolstered (or contrarily, if Individual Sovereignty, which is a God Given Right is nullified) by law. While the Right to Property may not be a "God Given Right", it is intrinsic in Sovereignty as it is defined civilly, and thus there can be no non-fraudulent government that can take property away from an individual for any reason other than as an act of war (one Sovereign acting against another).